UFOLOGY TRUTH

The study of unidentified flying objects is laughed at. Why? Is it because those who are interested and those who have claimed to see them are loony or all lying, or is it because the masses have been trained by the mass media directed by the most shadowy part of the US government?
Military-industrial complex: Money, Empire

The US government is the military-industrial complex of which president Dwight Eisenhower spoke in his presidential farewell-address to the nation. That military was started ostensibly to ward off enemies. We can view it as having developed out of two main avenues. One was the fighting done against the Indians by White, independent settlers (trying to escape the Empire) and then colonists (those invading America for the imperial, colonial British Empire). The other is the fighting called the US Revolution. One can argue that the Indians would never have been an enemy had the Whites come in peace. That leads us to the current mind-set that is the military-industrial complex.

The military has the largest mundane vested interest there is. Without it, the scheme of the selfish wouldn't exist. That's why it must die and will. We won't elaborate on that point here though.

National security: False flags

The military is held out to the public as the instrument of national security against so-called real threats, even though we have seen that threats are (false flags) created in order to perpetuate the scheme. (That activity renders it a scheme.) Fear of competition is deliberately manufactured where calm and courage in the cooperative spirit ought to be the mentality promoted by humanity. The selfish though, as we've said, have a delusional vested interest in the perpetuation of the scheme that Eisenhower warned about and that Kennedy was learning about in office and was murdered for being an obvious threat to the scheme. He was in his first term, barring huge dirty tricks, would have been reelected, and was saying he wasn't going to wait until his farewell address to reveal things.

Foo fighters

Well, in the 1930's and 40's because the world was engaged in a world war, foo fighters and other phenomena began showing up. As we explained in the work, Supplement: There Is No Such Thing as a Conservative-Republican Christian: Jesus is a small-c communist, foo fighters are as follows:

...balls of light of various colors seen by pilots on both sides of the war and in various places around the planet. The balls of light, sometimes appearing disk shaped and metallic, defied all conventional explanation. They stayed with the airplanes, meaning the pilots couldn't shake them off no matter what. The balls of light could fly much faster than the airplanes or jets of the day. They could also turn at right angles and then shoot up out of sight.

This was far from the end of things. In fact, phenomena have continued since then right up to the present.

What of the original question concerning whether this is loony (a pejorative meaning crazy or foolish) or perceptions being controlled by the master hypnotists at the Pentagon. One way to approach this is to focus back in on the idea of national security with the question what if the world's militaries have always been at the mercy of higher intelligence, more advanced civilizations.

Couching truth as fiction

This kind of thinking and questioning finds its only outlet in the mainstream through so-called entertainment and under the guise of fiction. The only way the subject can be broached without being labeled "loony" is by being couched in the protective deniability of "fiction." This will change though. However, we won't go into that further either right here.

Is there any evidence that humanity on earth and its militaries exist at the mercy of more advanced civilizations?

Nuclear warheads and missiles instantly rendered inoperable

There is the alleged case of soldiers who, while guarding nuclear-missile silos, saw objects that were never identified (UFO's by definition). Then, ten to twenty missiles were suddenly inoperable.

This is the most important information to conceal for the military-industrial complex. With this information out in the public and confirmed, the logical conclusion for the people would be total disarmament.

God wants us bringing forth in love and peace, which in truth are the only ways and are one way.

Witnesses duped by the worst or the worst

The military has attempted to cover up such things and has refused to release any details. There are numerous other examples cited by those who study such matters from outside the military in an attempt to garner the truth.1 & 2 They comprise many people who were in the military, in the CIA, in the FBI, etc., who agreed while in governmental service not to reveal things but who have come to realize that that agreement was dishonest and, therefore, null and void. They were coerced at the time. They were under economic and even existential duress. They were momentarily duped into thinking that the most imperialistic and militaristic Americans are the best people to make such decisions. They are not, far from it. They are the worst choice.

Those who ran the military in WWII came out of the lower ranks of WWI. Those who ran the military during the Cold War (which was really hot but decentralized) advanced out of WWII.

The Air Force is the branch of the Pentagon that controls the Pentagons ultra-top secret ufology department. It does not share this information with the other branches or with the other intelligence agencies. It maintains the highest security levels to prevent spying and espionage by even the other branches and the intelligence community. It does this under the guise of national security, but it is really about preserving its huge part in the system that is the Empire. Even presidents are denied access and detailed information.

National-security apparatuses: Evil devices

America was radically altered by the world wars, which were really one long war that hasn't ended yet. All the national-security apparatuses around the world began to be magnified multifold. This happened in the US under Harry Truman at the end of the immediate hostilities of WWII. He was duped, as were the Russians. They duped each other and themselves, as always. It was a struggle between two different manifestations of falsehood, both avoiding the Gospel message.

The Cold War was a huge error. As a consequence, the US sided with dictatorship against dictatorship. It stamped out egalitarianism and pacifism for fear of losing the whole scheme. The Soviets did the same thing. Each played into the hands of those who personally profited the most from the situation, and of course it hasn't ended yet.

SAC

Well, it was under those circumstances that the US Strategic Air Command (SAC) was brought into being. SAC was formed in 1946. It was part of the Army until the creation of the Air Force as a separate branch in 1947. It was in charge of US long-range bombers and intercontinental ballistic missiles until 1992. During this time, information and material evidence concerning UFO's became increasingly classified. This happened under the mindset of general George Kenney and then under general Curtis LeMay, who headed SAC until 1957 when he was promoted to vice chief of staff the head of the Air Force in 1957 and then chief of staff in 1961. He was forced out in 1965. Before that though, he was able to continue entrenching the secrecy of his predecessors in office. He is famous in Ufology for having refused to allow senator Barry Goldwater the Air Force's UFO secrets especially concerning Roswell.

Roswell

The seminal event in the minds of most is the Roswell incident of July 1947. The Army Air Force and then the Air Force (officially formed a few months later in September) conducted a massive cover-up and disinformation campaign surrounding the event. A crash occurred near Roswell, Nevada. The site was cleaned up, and the evidence was kept from the public.

The debate swirls around whether or not the crash was of extraterrestrials. Regardless, the military embarked on a huge cover-up, now claiming that it was covering up its own high-altitude spy-balloon experiments.

Air Force explanations concerning other events just don't even come close to plausible.

Psy-ops

Despite the stories by the military, many people refuse to be under the overall spell that suggests the implausible that there have never been any extraterrestrial crafts concerning any sightings or events. They brave the indignities of those who are under that spell. People have been programmed by the hypnotic suggestions of the psy-ops and propaganda people to deride and ostracize and harm those who know that the facts about UFO's have been, and are being, concealed by the Pentagon and not for real national security but rather for the sake of the perpetuation of evil schemes.

One might be tempted to conclude that the military itself has created all the sightings and stories of close encounters and interactions, that somehow the military has always been much more advanced than projected. Well, certainly the military always has new generations of weapons under research and development. However, human kind has come out of the Stone Age. Each of us sees technological developments unfolding. We know that what is known now was not all known by the humans of earth in the past.

If true, the phenomena of disk-shaped, metallic objects that don't show up on radar and project beams of light onto nuclear warheads rendering them useless and then silently shooting away as if accelerating into hyperspace is not the product of the US Empire or the Russians or any other earthly nation. The US only seeks to obtain such capabilities. It uses what it sees and learns from interactions as models for its own research developments.

Multifold message: One message

Now, what is the significance of warheads and missiles being neutralized? It is an unmistakable multifold message. The problem is with anyone who would conceal it and fail to read it correctly. They are those with the largest vested interest in the status quo that is the US military.

The point is that if any such message is properly interpreted and released, the military would cease to exist.

Creating and maintaining fear for the selfish scheme

Rather than doing that though, the military uses its contrived mindset to turn everything on the issue of national defense and threats and menaces and the like. In its mind, the military must create and maintain as much fear in the hearts and minds of the people as possible in order for its selfish scheme to continue.

Why doesn't this other civilization render all such weapons useless?

Such questions go back to the Gospel and the stream of consciousness and conscience revealed in The Bible. There is a sorting of souls going on here and now. It has been going on since the beginning. It is occurring in a careful balance of freewill choice.

Freewill choices in the infinitely dimensioned

The fabric of time is all there forever, and we are moving across it seeing what is already there. That fabric is not two dimensional but infinitely dimensioned. At any moment, human beings and all beings may choose from infinite paths.

The constraints are mental. They are designed in so that evil human intentions are not totally unleashed. That is part of what the message of warheads and missiles being neutralized is about.

H. G. Wells said, "The universe, or nothing." Well, that is true. The question is not whether or not the universe. The question is how. How will earth's humans come to own the universe? The right way is via the new commandment. It is via the peaceful giving and sharing of all. It is via unselfishness and love.

We are being prepped for this. It is why the Holy Spirit is revealing so much about the scheme of the selfish.

The sorting will unfold. The evil will do their evil warring. Those who reject war and overcome fear and the hypnotic suggestions of the militarists will not die. Oh, they may appear to die in the mundane, but their souls will not die. The choice to reject war is one of those freewill choices in the infinitely dimensioned. It is part of the narrow way.

The question also arises as to whether or not all beings in the other civilizations are like-minded. This is the fear aspect that the military uses. It is a dumbing-down suggestion. Consider that there are evil spirits at the higher levels of extraterrestrial technology, but understand that the narrow-way choices are always present. Evil spirits want to deny that path. They use fear to deny the faith. Good spirits though are there and have the upper hand that is God.

God is the almighty spirit who lets the sorting go on for the sake of weeding out the evil to save the good.

Further understand that the good cannot be extinguished by the evil. It can only be put far away for those who turn away from the good that is and who is God.

The barriers and secrets of the military and all false national security must come down and be revealed. All things real must be manifest. This is part of our species' metamorphosis into beings of real truth, real light.

NASA

NASA filmed flying objects in space that fit the descriptions of those who have reported seeing UFO's. The objects travel at superhuman speeds. They make sudden, sharp turns. They are white and bright and they are huge (at least their ultra violet energy fields appear miles across). What's more they didn't show up on the infrared cameras that were simultaneously filming the same areas. The objects emitted no heat signature the cameras could sense. NASA scientists openly discussed all these things about the film. They have yet to come up with an answer that satisfies. They just don't know, and they admit it.3

Don't be numbed into ignoring the NASA film

David Sereda makes the case that NASA's film footage is of objects that were perceptible only in the ultraviolet range (outside the visible spectrum of the unaided human eye). In the second part of his video,4 he launches into sweeping speculations. Sereda speculates about tie-ins with Stonehenge, the Dogon Tribe of Mali (Africa, about the Sirius star system),5 the pyramids of Egypt, and the Dropa Stones6 of China. All this he ties together with a grand theory of warp-speed travel, the Great Flood, Sirius half-fish god-being star-travelers, Freemasonry, and more.

The eyes of many self-styled sophisticates roll concerning such speculations. It's understandable, since so many people are hucksters preying upon people who want the truth but who are taken in by this species of the greedy spirit. Much of what is called pseudoscience is of no higher quality than an American supermarket tabloid. They just make things up (hoaxes) to sell books and videos and to get speaking fees and donations, etc.

Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. (Matthew 7:14).

Consequently, the actual NASA film will be likewise ignored. This is always the case. Whenever there is reason for serious investigation and openness, someone or some group with great curiosity and a likewise great tendency to read too much into things will give the complacent people plenty of ammunition to use against probing for the truth in general. What they teach is, don't ask any questions outside the established parameters, or you're too naïve and gullible. However, that leads to death.

Regardless of David Sereda's other speculations, the NASA film really shows objects in space that the NASA scientists refuse to, or cannot, identify. There's no doubt about it. None of the ideas offered up as possible explanations by NASA is correct.

So, as with some of the wild ideas put forth in the 9-11 Truth Movement, such as the no-plane theories, don't throw away an inquiring mentality just because others are grasping at straws. Jesus said, "Ask." No one receives the truth without asking. The truth though is a job of discerning what to keep and what to discard or at least place in with reservations.

The Watchers

NASA has treated all of Sereda's points as ignorable. They refuse to concede to him even the obvious.

Concerning the Space Shuttle mission of February 1996, STS-75 (Space Transportation System-75), the film shows the objects flying behind a NASA tether {Tethered Satellite System Re-flight (TSS-1R)} that is some seventy-seven or more miles away in the NASA film. Yet, the NASA story is that the objects are close to the camera lens or just space junk. However, NASA film clearly shows so-called space junk making maneuvers not possible with mere space junk. Why does NASA put out such obviously misleading statements? Why are they covering up? It isn't for the good.

The energy in the ionosphere is so strong that the tether glowed so brightly it could be seen from the ground. A shorter tether had been released in 1992. It failed to generate more than low voltage. This may rule out that space junk was glowing due to the effect on that junk by the ionosphere. Also, what would account for the pulsing of some and not other objects that seem near each other? It might have been tumbling, but the pulsing would start and stop. No dead space junk would just start and stop tumbling like that. Something would have to move it and stop it, such as a thruster.

Why won't the government release what it knows? They want the private, special privilege and advantage they afford themselves by reason of their secrets.

Will they block private access to space?

What are they going to do when private citizens go into space with the same or better equipment that was being used by NASA at the time? Private investigations will discover what's going on. Will the US Space Command deny people the right to go, or to see, to keep the people in the bubble? Will they continue to trick the people into acquiescing? They will simply say, without merit, "You are not authorized." Your passport to space will be denied.

You will not be allowed to be a pioneer escaping the evil of the oligarchs by traveling beyond their controlled domain. Wherever you go, they will catch up and bring with them the same old evil cover-ups.

How to turn the tables

The only way to prevent them is via real Christianity that will bring the real angels of light, the real host of heaven, in the name of the real God, to reverse things, to limit the evil ones of human kind and to free the righteous.

So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just. (Matthew 13:49).

But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only. (Matthew 24:36).

When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory. (Matthew 25:31).

Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels. (Matthew 25:41).

Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? (Matthew 26:53).

"But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only." Focus on that. Don't let the conditioning and hypnotic suggestion from evil keep you from seeing and understanding. When the time is right, it will happen. Make strait the way. Bring forth. Be a Real Liberal Christian.

Let us bring forth the Christian commons. Let us feed the lambs and sheep of God. Let us follow the golden rule. Let us be the good Samaritans. Let us do these things together as real Christians must.

The false hearted do all of what they are doing in the name of the satanic spirit by simply ignoring the valid questions of the likes of David Sereda. They do it with a debunking psychology in an attempt to manipulate the perceptions of the people, to condition the people, to feed them hypnotic suggestions, to keep the people's minds from going there. Where is "there"?

"There" is that there are watchers who at various levels and in various ways intervene in human activities. These watchers are vastly more advanced than are human beings on the earth.

I saw in the visions of my head upon my bed, and, behold, a watcher and an holy one came down from heaven. (Daniel 4:13).

This matter is by the decree of the watchers, and the demand by the word of the holy ones: to the intent that the living may know that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will, and setteth up over it the basest of men. (Daniel 4:17).

And whereas the king saw a watcher and an holy one coming down from heaven, and saying, Hew the tree down, and destroy it; yet leave the stump of the roots thereof in the earth, even with a band of iron and brass, in the tender grass of the field; and let it be wet with the dew of heaven, and let his portion be with the beasts of the field, till seven times pass over him. (Daniel 4:23).

Proof?

Does the fact that the NASA films are recordings of space-flying objects that are not identified (UFO's) prove that those objects are inhabited by extraterrestrial, higher-intelligent life? It neither proves nor disproves it. Does it prove they are the watchers? Again, it neither proves nor disproves it. Is it a sign of life? Yes; however, we must understand that "life" is usually spoken of on earth as the biologists define it, which may not apply here with all of the biologists criteria. Does it prove intelligence? Yes; however, here again, we must consider the concept. Are fish and birds and insects intelligent in quite the same sense as customarily meant when the term is used? They are intelligent of a sort. They don't cart around their own individualized cerebral cortexes; however, they are networked into consciousness nevertheless. They are alive and they sense. How they work into the self-awareness of the entirety is God's knowledge that won't be shared with the unsharing or hypocrites or hardhearted, being all the same.

God knows what everything is doing. Nothing senses that God doesn't sense.

Beyond the scientific five senses: Dreams

They communicate to people in their dreams and elsewise. Think about that. The materialists, the human scientists say that we know only through our five senses; yet, people sense (receive) through their dreams.

Does this mean that there is no scientific way of explaining such things? If one continues to demand testable signs rather than softening one's heart, that one will be denied.

Just ignore the host of heaven: Don't go there

NASA and the US military, etc., collectively have decided to act as much as possible as if these watchers and interveners are operating mostly under a hands-off directive. Like the "prime directive" of Star Trek. In other words, the government knows about them, but continues on with their plans as much as possible as if the higher life forms don't exist and don't really signify on some level.

Astronaut Gordon Cooper testifies to chasing UFOs in his F-86 Fighter jet in Germany, post WW II, double lenticular [lentil-shaped] disc-shaped UFOs that out-performed his fighter, and another case at Edwards AFB in 1957; Astronaut Edgar Mitchell (Apollo 14) walked on the moon and testifies that UFOs are real; USAF Ret Ken Storch testifies that UFOs nearly started WW III mistaken for Russian ICBMs; Medical Doctor Lynn Kitei (The Phoenix Lights), John Schuessler, NASA Contactor [contractor?], etc....

When Expert Witnesses testify to seeing and having experiences with Flying Saucers and UFOs, we would think that our own Space Agency, Government, Congress and the President would listen in. Seriously now, we have so much to gain by learning from Extraterrestrial civilizations: like how to solve the energy pollution crisis, how to travel between star systems and other galaxies, and spiritual evolution. Why not believe?

In a court of Law, an Expert Witness is a witness who has knowledge not normally possessed by the average person concerning the topic that he is to testify about. That means, if someone with less experience in their area of expertise testifies against them, such as a news paper columnist, it does not stand. You cannot challenge an Expert Witness unless you are an Expert Witness yourself.

Why is it that when Expert Witnesses testify by the hundreds to thousands in "Project Disclosure," and in this film [Dan Aykroyd: Unplugged on U.F.O.s], that journalists claim they are all delusional and seeing weather related phenomena? What makes a journalist an Expert Witness? Don't you think Gordon Cooper knows every enemy airplane by number, and every allied airplane by number, let alone balloons, and rockets? Also, that he would know when he is looking at a craft that [is] anti-gravitic, truly beyond all known technology? When Ken Storch USAF Retired testifies that UFOS nearly caused WW III at Space Command, he is testifying as an Expert Witness. John Schuessler is testifying as an Expert Witness that he saw the Filed Reports on Several Astronaut UFO encounters, including James McDivitt['s], Gemini IV, 1965 UFO Sighting.

Why is it that certain people in the media ommit [omit] Expert Witness Testimony and claim to be more knowledgeable that these very experts in their own repsective [respective] fields? Why did Time Magazine report UFO sightings by expert witnesses with glowing testimony without critique in the 1960s? How did this all change? Is this coverup [cover-up] being paid for by the CIA?

Time Magazine Reported on July 27, 1962 that while test flying the X-15, Major Bob White (another Expert Witness) found a new mystery for scientists to puzzle: Through the X-15's thick left quartz window, he saw a strange sight. "There are things out there," he said dramatically ove rhis [over his] voice radio. "There absolutely is." As White later described on "thing,": "It looked like a piece of paper the size of my hand tumbling slowly outside the plane. t [It] was greyish in color, and about 30 to 40 feet away. I haven't any idea what it could be."7

David Sereda is asking rhetorical questions here. His point is well taken.

The answer concerning why journalists dismiss all the witnesses, no matter how high, including president Jimmy Carter, those journalists, it must be remembered, have been raised up within the political-socialization process that is designed to program human minds to thought-termination. Don't go there. That's what they've been programmed to do. As soon as certain topics are raised, the programming, the spell, blocks them. This is designed by the selfish so that they, the selfish, may keep the rest of humanity from having their fair share of the inheritance from God.

When there were unexplained lights over Phoenix, Arizona, the night of March 13, 1997, between 7:30 and 10:30 PM,8 many hundreds of people saw the lights. Many of them finally saw a dark triangle (which nearly blacked out the stars) pass silently over the city. All of this was subjected to thought-terminating measures by the so-called official authorities, especially the governor's office.

Heart, eyes, and ears

They are conditioned to dismiss, gloss over, ignore, not absorb, not see or hear. Moses, Ezekiel, and Jesus were very clear on this.

Yet the LORD hath not given you an heart to perceive, and eyes to see, and ears to hear, unto this day. (Deuteronomy 29:4).

Son of man, thou dwellest in the midst of a rebellious house, which have eyes to see, and see not; they have ears to hear, and hear not: for they are a rebellious house. (Ezekiel 12:2).

And other fell on good ground, and did yield fruit that sprang up and increased; and brought forth, some thirty, and some sixty, and some an hundred. And he said unto them, He that hath ears to hear, let him hear. (Mark 4:8-9).

Softheartedness

Moses said, "heart to perceive." This is it. This is what overcomes the deniers. Jesus made this so much clearer. Softheartedness is what will open you up to perceiving what the evil ones want to deny you and everyone else.

If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren within any of thy gates in thy land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thine heart, nor shut thine hand from thy poor brother. (Deuteronomy 15:7).

The Good Samaritan; the golden rule

Who is your brother? Who is your neighbor? Jesus made this so clear also. The answer is everyone.

O LORD, why hast thou made us to err from thy ways, and hardened our heart from thy fear? Return for thy servants' sake, the tribes of thine inheritance. (Isaiah 63:17).

For they considered not the miracle of the loaves: for their heart was hardened. (Mark 6:52).

He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them. (John 12:40).

The evil ones, the selfish ones, the capitalists and large-c Communists (mammon worshippers; testers; prideful) want their selfish desires fulfilled here and now no matter how terrible they make it for others. They will go on imagining that they are immune from the harvest. They aren't. No one is. It is only a question of whether one will be sorted as unwelcome weed or good grain (suitable for righteousness).

When you have a fruit tree with a limb that is bringing forth evil fruit, you take out your pruners and cut off that bad branch. Then the tree is healthy. When you have bare-root tree stock, before you plant the tree, you prune away any bad parts of the root system. Then the tree will grow from healthy roots.

Immunity

Of course, there are places (thoughts) we ought not go unprepared to ward off evil temptations. If one is going to saves souls who are in the bowels of hell, one must be immunized. For example, Jesus Christ was immunized from falling to the temptations of evil here on this plane of existence, this plane of consciousness and conscience. When the higher spirit left his flesh (he gave up the ghost), wherever it (he; his soul-spirit) went, he was prepared. Hence, his flesh was reanimated with that same, enlightened spirit even more experienced and part of God. Define God properly, and all of this makes perfect sense. Death could not limit Jesus's enlightened, anointed soul.


FOOTNOTES:

1 Out Of The Blue, a video documentary. 2003. Link. (last accessed: Friday, February 09, 2007). Return to text body.

2 "UFO Evidence : COMETA Report." a website containing documentation of a high-level, official French report on the fact of UFO's. Link. (last accessed: Friday, February 09, 2007). Return to text body.

3 We don't subscribe to every bit of the speculation offered in this film, but it does show the actual footage from the NASA satellites and gives facts about NASA's position on the UFO's sighted by NASA: David Sereda. Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 1, a video. 2001. Link. (last accessed: Wednesday, February 14, 2007). Return to text body.

David Sereda if not a Gnostic subscriber was at the time of this video at least open to Gnosticism, per se.

4 David Sereda. Evidence: The Case For NASA UFO's - Part 2, a video. 2001. Link. (last accessed: Thursday, February 15, 2007). Return to text body.

5 "The Dogon/Sirius Mystery." Link. (last accessed: Friday, February 16, 2007); and

"Dogon people." Wikipedia. Link. (last accessed: Friday, February 16, 2007). Return to text body.

6 The Dropa Stones are a long story. They are stones that contain the story of extraterrestrials who crashed to Earth some twelve thousand years ago. If you are interested, read the article cited immediately below. There are two obvious questions that arise concerning these Dropas, extraterrestrials whose spaceship crashed to Earth. Since some of them supposedly survived and lived among the human race, what happened to their technological knowledge and to the remains of their craft?

Stephen Wagner. "The Dropa Stones." About.com. Link. (last accessed: Thursday, February 15, 2007). Return to text body.

7 David Sereda. "Why Dan Aykroyd on UFOs?" David Sereda. July 7, 2006. Link. (last accessed: Thursday, February 15, 2007). Return to text body.

8 "What were those lights in the Phoenix sky?: Researchers still sorting out hundreds of witness accounts." June 19, 1997. CNN. Link. (last accessed: Thursday, February 15, 2007). Return to text body.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.