Who gave Britain the right to establish Israel? There are two competing views, both theological.

The first is that God sets up every worldly Empire, hardening hearts, setting up the basest, most mean-spirited, selfish, and inferior men as the heads of those Beasts.

The second is that every worldly Empire is self-authorizing {arrogantly usurping God's position (desire and will)}, rebellious, and willful.

Every Empire has redrawn the map.

The truth is that God desires no political map, no religious map, no economic-system map, no Caste or class map, no worldly Imperial map. It is God's will that there be no political boundaries or barriers, that there truly be one world government (organizing principles and practices) based upon the following, among other things:


Giving and sharing so that none goes without and none has more than needed before all have all that is needed and that even then that all rise equally with the tide; and,

Honesty about human sexuality that the true direction of the design of the human body (when not subjected to the corrupting effects of the evil spirit of sin) is toward monogamous mating for procreation.

Now, Israel demands to be recognized on the basis of a political, religious, economic-system, class, and worldly Imperial map all drawn up by self-authorizing, rebellious, willful souls.

We must remember that all such maps have been drawn by worldly Beast-Empires. There is no political nation-state on the face of the earth that is recognized by the so-called world community of nation-states that is not the result of such drawing.

Does this mean than that Israel ought to be recognized? It means that no nation-state as currently constituted is true, real, correct, or righteous. The maps are illusory. There are no such maps in the real heaven or the real, new earth.

This, of course, conjures up false paradoxical thinking in the minds of many. They immediately become trapped in false logic. They don't comprehend the meaning, the concept, of the term "real" as used in the revelation of Jesus Christ. Their language cannot save them from themselves.

They will say that heaven has levels and that those levels are therefore relative to one another, suggesting that there are classes in heaven. Ah, but this is denial of the infinitely perfect who is God who is in the absolute heaven. This is where God's perspective resides. This is why we are called to evermore righteous rising in the full knowledge of our imperfection (humility). This is why Jesus didn't know in advance the exact hour or day of the temple's destruction and didn't and doesn't know the moment of the second coming or the ultimate salvation or the Day of Judgment or the end of fleshly time; yet, he was infinitely close to the spirit that knows, that moves these things.

Their new world order is falsehood. The real new world order is the opposite of all that they have been and are still building up. Their false new world order will topple. It is top heavy and standing on feet of clay. Its head is conceit. Its heart is deceit.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.