We've mentioned a number of times in our previous writings that ultimately we receive our own standards. One will be on the receiving end of one's types of acts. If one tortured and is unrepentant or is recidivistic to the end of this life, one will be tortured in some form to some degree, for instance. The form and degree will be dependant upon the degree to which one realized the sin. Faking ignorance won't help.

If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin: but now have they both seen and hated both me and my Father. — Jesus (John 15:24).

Now, the sadist is often a masochist. The torturer is often someone who wants also to feel pain. The soul is disturbed. It has been abused. It is damaged, fractured, deconstructed. Its manifestation, its very matter, is damaged. Its brain form, structure, and function are altered away from the optimal, away from the good, the right, wisdom, and the like. It is conditioned (habituated) toward greater evil. It is desensitized (acclimated): Hardened, reduced, and darkened (unenlightened). It requires greater stimuli in order to feel. It can and often does believe it deserves abuse and that others deserve it also. It is the agent, the puppet, the work, the creation, of disintegration. It becomes more broken up parts of illness. It is the opposite course of wholesomeness that is ultimate health.

On the side of goodness, this is not tolerated, condoned, or done. It is not for the sake of retribution or punishment. However, it is punishing, and there are those who relish the idea of torturing the torturers. That though is from the side of evil.

From the side of good, it is better that one not fall too far before seeing the light and overcoming. It is best that one not fall at all. Freewill given by God does not mean that falling is good. Turning is good. Remaining close to God is good. Having only God within filling one with nothing but light is best.

The naysayers will attempt to use their game theories and arbitrariness to justify their continuing in sin. They will say that it is an evil standard to stand by doing nothing while people are being subjected to evil. They will suggest that the Christian pacifists, by their own standard, will be left (without rescue) to the oppressors and torturers. This then becomes a rationalizing paradox for the broken and lost.

The truth is that Christians (pacifists always) will be on the receiving end of their standard. Their standard is no torture; therefore, in the end, they will not be tortured but will have overcome. In this way, they will have been rescued. Overcoming is rescuing. The real peace is stopping all the violence.

This is both spiritual and scientific. Science has confirmed that the brain matter of the torturer is damaged. Those who are more willing to harm others to "rescue" people have damage to those parts of the brain from which unselfish feelings emanate. The greater the damage, the more harm and offense the brain is fashioned to do. This then heads the soul manifestly in the direction of the satanic mind into greater and greater harm, pain, suffering, confusion, and so forth.

One may ask wherein does scripture say this about one ultimately being on the receiving end of one's type of acts. This is a question coming out of darkness. Why doesn't the light penetrate such minds? How can it be lost on people who read scripture? For us, scripture is perfectly clear and plain about this.

Jesus said blessed are the pacifists. They will exist in peace. Did he say it verbatim?

Jesus taught by way of implications. How can that be missed? His parables are loaded with implications. That's what reading comprehension is all about. That's what real scriptural interpretation is. That's why he asked people how they read (interpret).

For Jesus, these things were no longer subtle. They stood out glaringly. They can for us also if we will magnify them. This is why the word must be spread everywhere in every tongue so that salvation will come.

Ask God and Jesus if we have written correctly on this matter. The answer you will receive is that yes we have.

Don't be led further and further astray. Turn back to the real. The preachers of selfishness are speaking out of darkness, damage, illness, and all the rest of the corruption and falsehood.

If you recognize yourself as being one of them, turn. Turn from the corruption of violence, greed, and sexual depravity.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.