We're sickened by tainted food and other imports because our government is unwilling to eat into the profits of the corporations our regulators serve, David Goldstein writes.
More from the article:
For decades our government has been dominated by a conservative ideology that claims to despise big government, abhor regulation and adhere to an unswerving faith in the infinite wisdom of the market. Rick Perlstein dubs this philosophy "E. Coli Conservatism," and in practice it is not only flawed but corrupt: a calculated conservative project intended to gut our regulatory systems in the interest of sheer corporate greed. We eat adulterated food not because we cannot adequately regulate the industry but because to do so would eat into the profits of the corporations our regulators serve.
In the six years since 9/11, food-borne pathogens and toxins have quietly killed ten times the number of Americans who died in the terrorist attacks. How many more Americans must conservatism kill before our leaders embrace a more responsible ideology?
Comment: Well, who will decide what? Will this be an ideology of Big Brother knows best, or will it be an ideology of the people will decide from the ground up? What about the people who won't want to follow the dictates of the majority? Will the state use coercive measures against them even if they are being peaceful and not bothering anyone else? Will the state use force against them, because the majority has somehow convinced itself that it knows best? Where will God fit into this picture (God being spirit/righteousness)? Will this state insist that homosexuality is acceptable? It's already headed in that direction.
This envisioned state is not a voluntary association. It is not the result of each individual's God-given, freewill choice. It is forced upon people, just as the current system is forced upon people. In fact, it is the same system only pointed a little differently on the wide path to hell. This ideology is one of fear and selfishness. It is one of looking in every closet and peeking under every bed. It is not the message that will cause others to stop their own selfishness, which is in fact the reason the poisons got into the pet food and human food supply. This state says make and consume for profit and spend and spend to protect from that very system. We can't regulate capitalism into safety and security. That's a logical fallacy in both the mundane and divine. The answer rather lies in changing hearts.
We must change humanity's emotions. Compassion must be everything. Then the driving selfishness behind the poisonings will disappear.
Of course, this will not finish until after the division to come. The evil, selfish ones must rise up and fall for an entire age. That's the prophecy, and it also makes perfect sense. We can see it coming. The signs are there. Things will become starker and starker. The choice will become clearer and clearer. People will turn more and more to light or darkness. It will result in great tribulation and result in the destruction of the forces of darkness for an age.
The elect, the chosen, those who choose the path to God that Jesus blazes, will persevere and their souls will be manifest in eternal light.
This current system is unholy. It is unworthy. It is fatally flawed and cannot be made into a new vessel to hold the reborn in the spirit of truth, love, and peace. It must go. It will go. It is correctly prophesied.
Bring forth Heaven, which is peace and bounty and wholesomeness: Perfect unity. Spread that ideology. It is the only correct ideology.
The Nation: Top Stories on July 12, 2007, 9:23amfrom
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)