Radiation Warning Signs Placed on Cheyenne River
by Shelley Bluejay Pierce
Radiation warning signs were posted on Wednesday, July 18, 2007 in the small town of Red Shirt, South Dakota which lies on the northwest corner of the Pine Ridge Reservation.
(Everitt Poor Thunder (far left) meets with members of the media
as he explains the posting of the radiation warning signs being posted
in the river areas. Photo by, "Defenders of the Black Hills" )
leader in Red Shirt, asked Defenders of the Black Hills, an
environmental organization, whether the Cheyenne River water could be
used to irrigate a community garden. A local well could not be used as
it was found to be radioactive and warning signs surround that
structure. The water well taps into the Inyan Kara aquifer that also
contains the Lakota and Fall River formations, making up an extremely
large aquifer of water supplies for many regions.
of Red Shirt occupy a village site that is thousands of years old to
the Oglala Tetuwan (Sioux) people. Many have lived here all of their
lives, growing gardens with water taken from the Cheyenne River and
fishing for catfish, bass, and turtles. In the summer months, the river
is used for swimming and other recreational pursuits.
water sample taken from the Cheyenne River was sent to a laboratory and
the results revealed levels of alpha radiation above the Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) Maximum Contaminant Level. Alpha radiation
causes harm when ingested hence the warning signs were placed to warn
people of the dangers in the Cheyenne River.
The portion of
the Cheyenne River Basin that lies in southwestern South Dakota drains
about 16,500 square miles within the boundaries of the state. The area
in this basin includes part of the Black Hills and Badlands, rangeland,
irrigated cropland, and mining areas. After traversing the western half
of the state from southwest to northeast, the Cheyenne River flows into
Lake Oahe, a reservoir on the Missouri River.
efforts remove the radiation in the water at Red Shirt have been
unsuccessful. Drinking water is piped in, or residents must drive 25
miles to the little town of Hermosa to buy water. The Cheyenne River
has dried up approximately one mile from Red Shirt and tests of the
river bottom soil by Defenders of the Black Hills are pending. Initial
tests using a Geiger counter revealed more than double the amount of
normal background elevations for radiation.
news reports recently referred to a DENR report and stated that uranium
is naturally occurring in that area which is said to account for the
radiation levels in the water.
"If that was the case, there
would not have been villages there for thousands of years. There would
have been no fish or any aquatic life previously in this river. We
sampled the river with nets for aquatic life and found only 2 crayfish
and about 10 minnows in more than 100 yards of the river. In essence,
it's a dead river. There are two endangered species that use this
River: the Sturgeon chubb, a small fish, and the Bald Eagle," explained
Charmaine White Face, founder and Coordinator of Defenders of the Black
According to published information in the The 2006
South Dakota Integrated Report For Surface Water Quality Assessment the
Cheyenne River water quality continues to be generally poor. The lower
Cheyenne drainage, in general, contains a high percentage of erodible
cropland and rangeland in west central South Dakota. Historical mining
records for the state show more than 4,000 exploratory uranium mining
holes, some large enough for a man to fall into, in the southwestern
Black Hills with an additional 3,000 holes just 10 miles west of the
town of Belle Fourche, SD. These mining holes go to depths of 600 feet.
a meeting for the Defenders of the Black Hills on Feb 26th 2005,
discussions centered on the radiation levels in some areas reported at
a staggering 1,400 times higher than the ordinary background radiation
on the Grand River in the Cave Hills and the adverse affects to the
villages on the Standing Rock Indian Reservations. Also discussed was
the high proportion of cancer related illnesses and birth defects
especially in the small community of Rock Creek.
also hundreds of abandoned uranium mines in Wyoming whose runoff comes
down the Cheyenne River, and also 29 abandoned mines in the
southwestern Black Hills, all upstream of Red Shirt Village. One of the
largest open-pit abandoned uranium mines in the southern Black Hills is
a square mile and its runoff goes into the Cheyenne River," explained
Charmaine White Face.
Most recently, a Canadian mining
company, Powertech, began drilling uranium exploratory wells in the
Dewey Burdock area northwest of Edgemont. Defenders of the Black Hills
battled in court against the drilling permit allowing Powertech to
drill 155 more exploratory wells at depths of 500-600 feet in the
southwestern Black Hills but the Courts allowed the drilling after
denying the appeal. Powertech currently has 4,000 uncapped, and
unmarked uranium exploratory wells drilled previously. The mining
company plans on doing In Situ Recovery (ISR) of uranium from the
Lakota and Fall River aquifers. In Situ Recovery was formerly known as
In Situ Leach (ISL) mining.
During the ISR process, a
solution to dissolve the uranium is poured down the wells and the
dissolved uranium brought back up to the surface. The uranium is
separated from the remaining radioactive waste solution that is then
reinjected into the aquifer after being held in waste ponds on the
According to Powertech's mining application, each
exploratory drill hole "will have a small excavated mud pit that will
be approximately 12 feet by 5 feet" and 10 feet deep.
the concerns of the environmental groups are the possibility of
overflow from the mud pits with the sudden rain showers that occur in
the Black Hills. One of the aquifers empties directly into the Cheyenne
River and is used by many ranchers to water their livestock. Among the
deeper aquifers of concern is the Madison that provides water for many
western South Dakota communities.
"A list of uranium mining
facts provided online by our organization, Defenders of the Black
Hills, reveals a long history of abuses regarding uranium and coal
mining in the Upper Midwest region. In an area of the USA that has been
called "the Bread Basket of the World," more than forty years of mining
have released radioactive polluted dust and water runoff from the
hundreds of abandoned open pit uranium mines, processing sites,
underground nuclear power stations, and waste dumps. Our grain supplies
and our livestock production in this area have used the water and have
been exposed to the remainders of this mining. We may be seeing global
affects, not just localized affects, to the years of uranium mining"
concluded Charmaine White Face.
Pacific Free Press on July 31, 2007, 10:53pmfrom
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)