by William Hughes

(Monday, August 6, 2007)

The Democrats are now in bed with the Bush-Cheney Gang, who launched the Iraqi War based on a pack of rotten lies. Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) continues to vote to fund the conflict. Her mantra: "I support the troops," is rebutted by the Iraq Veterans Against the War, who insist: "Funding the war is killing the troops." The protesters at Sen. Mikulski's Hi Rise residence, on 08/03/07, bore witness to her complicity in the evil that is the Iraqi War.

"One might expect [her] to consult [her] conscience...But, since it's a matter of moral conclusions...there is, unfortunately, no cause for optimism."

—- Carl G. Jung

Baltimore, MD - August 3, 2007, was the ninth consecutive Friday afternoon, when pro-Peace activists gathered in front of the luxurious Hi Rise residence of Maryland's senior U.S. Senator—Barbara Mikulski. They insisted on bearing witness to her complicity with the violence-breeding War, Death & Mayhem Machine of the Bush-Cheney Gang. Sen. Mikulski has regularly voted to fund the illegal and immoral Iraqi War to the tune of $450 billion. She is also a big supporter of President George W. Bush's "Surge" scheme. As of today's date, 3,669 U.S. troops have died in the conflict, 68 of those heroes have been from the state of Maryland, and 17 called Baltimore City home. Meanwhile, the civilian fatalities in Iraq are approaching one million. [1] Sen. Mikulski's mantra is: "I support the troops!" Yet, the brave soldiers who have actually been doing the fighting in Iraq insist otherwise. They say: "Funding the war is 'killing' the troops—and delaying further any prospects for real diplomacy, reconciliation and peace." [2]

One of the demonstrators on the sidewalk outside of Mikulski's fancy penthouse was Dean Pappas. He's an activist whose strong antiwar views were honed during the Vietnam War era, when he stood, often shoulder to shoulder, with the late, great Phil Berrigan, the "Dissenter Emeritus," in opposing the evils of the American Empire. Pappas said: "I have actually known [Sen.] Barbara Mikulski for over 40 years. We worked together. I was really proud of what she did in standing up to U.S. imperialism in Central America. I don't know what happened. Maybe, she got kidnapped by aliens! But, she has no business being this meek. She needs to stand up. There are people dying, up to 3,700 Americans, and we can do something about that. The international community can work on Iraq, that is another issue, but the U.S. is only harming Iraq. We know that the sooner we bring them [the troops] home, the sooner we can end the American fatalities. And, that is what is motivating the American people right now. They are sick of this!" [3]

On Nov. 7, 2006, the American electorate gave the Democratic Party a ringing mandate to end the Iraqi War and to bring the troops home. Tragically, the Democrats chickened out and have miserably failed their duty. Since they took control of the U.S. Congress, in Jan., 2007, 666 U.S. troops have died in the Iraqi War. It is fair to say that the Democrats are complicit in the wrongdoings of the warmongering Bush-Cheney Gang, who deliberately lied the nation into a war of aggression. [4] It is a War Crime, a "Crime against Humanity" under the UN Charter, and also an impeachable offense, to engage in a war of aggression. [5]

Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich (D-OH), the author of H Res 333, which demands the impeachment of V. P. Dick Cheney, has charged that Cheney: "Fabricated" the intelligence process to mislead the country into the Iraqi conflict. [1] Sen. Mikulski knows that to be true, since she is a member of the U.S. Senate's Select Committee on Intelligence and had access to the true facts. As I write, Iraq a nation of 27 million souls, is a basket case. Its major city, Baghdad, with a population of over six million has been off and on without electricity, sewage treatment facilities, running water, adequate food and medical supplies. Iraq, today, represents a humanitarian crisis of the highest order. [6] Sen. Mikulski, like so many other War Hawks, refuses to see the horrific consequences of her own baleful actions. The demonstrators were there, in front of her expensive condominium, to remind her of those lethal connections. Carl G. Jung put it this way: "The evil in of gigantic proportions...[Nevertheless], man is 'an enigma' to himself...None of us stands outside humanity's black collective shadow." [7]

Maria Allwine, another anti-Sen. Mikulski activist, also shared her views with me about why she was protesting. "Mikulski makes a lot of noise about being against the war...She is doing nothing to get us out of there...The bottom line is [that she] votes to continue funding the war...We are here to tell [Sen.] Mikulski, at her home, that she needs to stop voting to fund the war...She lives in comfort...while Iraqi children have no water, no electricity, no health care and they live in a country that has been destroyed by our country. And for which, I am deeply ashamed...When [Sen. Mikulski] stops voting to fund the war. We'll go away!" [3]

Incidentally, the temperature in Baghdad reached 113 degrees last week. Oxfam, a group that works to alleviate human suffering around the globe, said: "There are eight million people in Iraq in need of 'emergency' care!" [6] They will, of course, never get that "emergency care," if Sen. Mikulski, and other Democrats, remain willing accomplices and/or stooges of the Bush-Cheney Gang.

Anti-Mikulski protester, Jay Gillen, made this telling comment to me: "Sen. Mikulski is one of the most 'powerful' people in the world, along with the other U.S. Senators...When a Senator in the U.S. acts helpless, we have to do everything we can to remind that person [Sen. Mikulski] that they aren't helpless...and that they can make something happen and end this war." [3] Dr. Larry Egbert said he was there, across the street from the Hi Rise, demonstrating because Sen. Mikulski supports "the killing" in Iraq. He wanted to know: "Why" more people weren't with him protesting Sen. Mikulski's ongoing role in this tragic debacle. [3] Matt Chalkley, another advocate for Peace, told me: There are a lot of things we could be doing with the taxpayers' money that we are wasting in the Iraqi War; like "fixing the infrastructure, as we saw [with the bridge collapse] in Minneapolis...It's [also] a waste of [lives of] a generation of young people." [3]

I leave the final word on this shining example of the importance of individuals, like these five demonstrators, to object on moral and legal grounds, to Sen. Mikulski's complicity in the evil that is the Iraqi War to Mr. Pappas. He said: "[Sen. Mikulski] is 'selling us out' by being so timid. If, indeed, it is timidity!"

Originally from Latest headlines on August 7, 2007, 6:56pm


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.