Friday, July 14, 2006:

We aren't going to get to a thoughtful world by beating each other. That's counter-productive. That was Jesus's point in being a pacifist. He didn't do to them what he didn't want done to him.

Now, that's the golden rule. It was found in ancient China and all over the world in one form or another before Jesus was born.

Many people use that as a call to ecumenicalism or syncretism. However, Jesus alone was sent and came and showed the new commandment, revealing the fully enhanced spirit of the golden rule. He demonstrated what we are to want to do and for others to do to be fully righteous: One with God.

Jesus spoke in the first person, singular of God. He said, "I am." "I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6). The only way to the Godhead, Godhood, is via truth. Therefore, worldwide, the knowledge of the true meaning of thoughtfulness is rising to the level of the new commandment. All that is not this, is false. All that opposes this is false. The way is peace, love, mercy, and all the other things Jesus showed. They are not via any other means, any means inconsistent with what Jesus said and showed. Nothing else is needed for the journey. This yoke alone is freedom. Feed the lambs and sheep. Be the good shepherd. Be the good steward. Be the good vineyardists in the mundane and in the spirit.

All religions are not equal. Religions are relative things in terms of their distance from God. Deceit, greed, violence, sexual depravity, and other iniquities are far from God. Religions which advocate, condone, or practice those things are inferior and ought to be rejected by human kind. Truth; peace; unselfishness; and sexual fidelity, monogamy, and purity, are all closer to the kingdom—the purer, the closer, perfectly pure being God in one. This is the one and only path to unity: One religion freely chosen.

Therein lies salvation for the planet, and therein lies the reason Jesus's way is the one and only narrow way to God: Righteousness. Everyone following any other spirit will not suffice. It won't arrive.

Those who went to be with God before Jesus was born, lived up to the standard revealed to them in their time here, the standard of which they were then capable of meeting (as obviously challenging as it was for them, for which God and they deserve credit) and of which the people were capable of absorbing to the extent they did and all for the sake of God's unfolding plan for humanity.

The people today have had years and decades of hearing about environmentalism. Many have continued to reject it. They have fought against it. Many so-called conservative evangelical Christians are actually glad for the environmental destruction, because they see it as promoting the end times and brings closer the second coming of Christ. They don't know what they are talking about. They couldn't be advocating a worse thing. They fight against God's sacred creation. They will get their comeuppance if they don't soon turn from their ways and repent.

Oh, there is no doubt that God has the power to undo all the environmental damage done by human kind. There is nothing humans can do that God cannot instantly put back to any state God would will. That though doesn't excuse human kinds abusing the once pristine gift of God that was the earth before humans began to pollute it because of the pollution that has come out of their hearts and mouths and deeds.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Sup1 No Such Thing Conservative-Republican Christian. Bookmark the permalink.