Saturday, September 02, 2006:
Castes are the social classes into which someone is born and fixed.
Yugas are the cycles of history. This is the cycle of rising and falling spiritual awareness in general for the planet. It has a correspondence with the astrological prophecy, meaning the story of the messiah that has been woven into the astrological observations. It is a synchronistic observation. It is a place at which cause and effect are synchronous or paralleled. It is occasioned by faith. It's not something that has a vocabulary so much as it is an emotional state where things happen that cannot be understood statistically. The odds are defied beyond mundane belief. God's hand is revealed beyond a doubt. This is not to say that all the interpretation and vision superimposed on the cycle of ages are accurate. They are not. They do not accurately predict the real faith. They calculate. The real faith doesn't come by way of calculation or advance thought.
Chakras are the energy places along the spine. The high up, the more enlightened and enlightening. If one thinks of the frontal lobe of the brain as the region where the most unselfish consciousness occurs and if one thinks of the tempting trouble posed by the sexual organs, one can see where this chakras concept could develop. Thinking constantly with feeding the sexual appetite will lead to ruin. It's common sense. Elevating the thoughts is a good and right idea. Who can argue with that. If one translates the energy of the chakras to spirit, there isn't anything wrong with bringing in the right spirit to turn off and displace that wrong spirit.
The four main forms of yoga (there are others) are Karma yoga is action in this world of matter; Jnana yoga is acquiring knowledge and improving the intellect; Bhakti yoga is devotion; and Raja yoga is meditation. Jesus said we are to do the deeds. The truth of God is the knowledge to acquire. It definitely improves the intellect. One is to do God's will always. There is no higher form of devotion. Jesus taught his followers how to pray when they asked him. However, Jesus was living prayer. There was no point of demarcation between his daily life and prayer.
The Gunas are the different conditions of matter. Matter (prakriti) has three different natures: Steadiness (sattvas), activity (rajas), and dullness (tamas). This covers emotional state; attraction and antipathy or disinclination; and emotional, intellectual, and moral complexion (spirit or soul or both in the view of many theists). It is the manifest aspect of the soul(s) (purusha). The sattvic matter is harmless in Christianity. It is also active. The rajasic is active but not moved to harmless or better still bringing forth healing. The tamasic is withdrawn. It is the injured in Christianity. The rajasic only make matters worse for the tamasic. The real sattvic, real, liberal Christianity, can draw out the righteous inclination in the tamasic.
All of the above in Hinduism correspond to each other. This is no surprise. There is a huge overlapping of Christianity and Hinduism within certain contexts. Christianity too has its themes if you will that carry over into every concept. Hinduism diverges from the Christ-mind of Jesus though in very stark ways as we have seen in earlier parts of this body of work. Going to the cross for the sake of righteousness, for real love, that's the difference.
Of course, Jesus didn't keep his caste position. Mahatma Gandhi later broke the falsehood concerning the untouchability of certain people. Also, Jesus made clear that it is what comes out of a person that defiles one. That is an extreme proof of total belief in God. The pure are incorruptible from all evil forces. This we believe as real, liberal Christians. The vessel (the flesh) may be killed as with Jesus, but the soul is not harmed. With the greatest faith, even the vessel cannot be harmed. There comes a time and place when the emotional state is such that things happen that cannot be understood by mundane belief. There is no testing of it. One either knows absolutely that the time and place are right or not.
Dualism versus monism : Both are contextually correct. God is ultimately the real one. Because the lesser commandments are consistent with the greater commandments, the more particularized is consistent with the unity, all provided one comprehends it. The lack of comprehension, that which does not comprehend, that which rejects, is unreal. It is false and not part of the one.
God is the particularized soul (atman), the universal soul (Brahman).
Devas are a sort of spiritual host. They are good in Hinduism and dad in Zoroastrianism.Asuras are the good ones in Zoroastrianism.
One can easily see where fracturing begins. The difference between the Hindus and the Zoroastrians is the remnant of the argument over whose vision is the correct one. That same theme runs throughout the religions that splinter into sects or denominations.
Most of the time, all of time really, the differences are over arguments that run at cross-purposes, meaning they are semantical arguments where the language has been or begun to fracture the one soul or spirit of one actually.
You see, the gods and pantheons of the various tribes, clans, families, nations, etc., are a direct reflection of those nations and their leaders. The nation (family and leader) is as strong or good or weak or bad as its view, translating into actions and the resulting consequences within the total environment (physical and spiritual).
It is a struggle for the hearts, souls, minds, and bodies of people.
One sees it in Islam, since Allah was the name of the highest god of the deities of Mohammed's family.
One sees it earlier in Judaism (Judahism). The view of Judah has prevailed for a while (until Shiloh comes; peace comes).
Pantheons changed and deities changed within pantheons. Pantheons rivaled each other. It was all humans rivaling each other. It was their spirits (personalities) rivaling each other.
Out of this comes a great deal of racism and ethnic bigotry. Our view is better. We act better. Our outcomes, consequences, results are better. We are better. Follow us. Do as we tell you.
Now this can be either do as we tell you or we'll force you, or it can be fail to follow at your own peril. It can be follow us, or it can be join us. This is the real split.
Most nations though fight over a false split. They each strive for coercive supremacy. That is what was going on as the Hebrews contested each empire from the Egyptians on through the Assyrians, Babylonians, less so the Persians, the Greeks, Romans (Italians), and through the Germans (Nazis). Now they are engaged in contesting the severely fractured and evermore fracturing Islamic Empire.
This way of being is all wrong, of course. The youngest children know it intuitively.
Jesus came to say that all the different visions, including the militant nationalistic view of God of the then Jews are missing the truth. He proved the power of the spirit wherever the belief was strong enough to bring forth. Rather than believe, the fractious continued rebelling. The consequences have been the history ever since.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)