Operation AJAX was the overthrow of Mohammed Mossadeq. Mossadeq was anti-Communist Party. He was pro-America. His so-called mistake was nationalizing the oil fields. The US CIA and UK MI6 undertook various terrorist attacks in Iran and blamed them on the Mossadeq government. They did everything they could to foment civil unrest. The CIA and MI6 killed clerics and attacked mosques. They shot down civilians and blamed it all on Mossadeq who was completely innocent. They printed up phony handouts and spread them around. The handouts made it look as if Mossadeq was against God (Allah).
The US is a state sponsor of terrorism.
The CIA in conjunction with other reactionary, clandestine agencies in other countries under took many killings of innocent civilians and blamed it on leftists. On three continents, the CIA and its network of other such agencies of other governments, including NATO nations, targeted passenger trains, commercial buses and most reprehensible, schools and school buses to deliberately kill innocent children so that general populations would become so upset about safety and security that the people would turn against the left and the Communists in particular, as if the Communists weren't doing bad enough things without being painted with the despicable things done by the CIA and NATO and other reactionary forces to little school children.
For examples, there is the following:
In Turkey, the "Counter-Guerrilla" was involved in domestic terror and torture operations against the Kurds, while in Greece, the "LOK" took part in the 1967 military coup d'Ã©tat to prevent a Socialist government. In Spain, the secret army was used to prop up the fascist dictatorship of Franco, and in Germany, right-wing terrorists used the explosives of the secret army in the 1980 terror attack in Munich.
The US and the other NATO allies who engaged in these activities are state sponsors of terrorism.
The CIA also blew up a Cuban flight killing all seventy-three people on the plane on October 6, 1976. Luis Posada Carriles, the CIA agent who carried out the mission, has been shielded by the US ever since. The US harbors terrorists.
The US is a state sponsor of terrorism.
Bush said, "You are either with us, or you are with the terrorists." Hardly.
When the Liberty was under attack for hours by Israel and when two US aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean Sea sent fighters to defend the Liberty, president Johnson reputedly spoke personally with the rear admiral Geis and told him to recall the fighters saying, "I want that God damn ship going to the bottom. No help. Recall the wings."
Wikipedia covers it as follows:
U.S. rescue attempts: At least two rescue attempts were launched from U.S. aircraft carriers nearby but were recalled, according to David Lewis, officer of the deck (OOD) during the attack. Lewis wrote and made an audio recording about a meeting 6th Fleet Rear Admiral Lawrence Geis requested in his cabins: "He told me that since I was the senior Liberty survivor on board he wanted to tell me in confidence what had actually transpired. He told me that upon receipt of our SOS, aircraft were launched to come to our assistance and then Washington was notified. He said that the Secretary of Defense (Robert McNamara) had ordered that the aircraft be returned to the carrier which was done. RADM Geis then said that he speculated that Washington may have suspected that the aircraft carried nuclear weapons so he put together another flight of conventional aircraft that had no capability of carrying nuclear weapons. These he launched to assist us and again notified Washington of his actions. Again McNamara ordered the aircraft recalled. He requested confirmation of the order being unable to believe that Washington would let us sink. This time President Johnson ordered the recall with the comment that he did not care if every man drowned and the ship sank, but that he would not embarrass his allies. This is, to the best of my ability, what I recall transpiring 30 years ago."
The word "embarrass his allies" was a smoke screen at the time.
If it's true, it was treason by the president for under taking a false-flag operation. All false-flag operations are treason. All operations that let reasonably preventable things happen are treason. It constitutes waging war against the US or at least aiding those who are attacking the US. That's mundane treason for those who have sworn to preserve, protect, and defend....
There was an Israeli pilot who refused to attack the Liberty, because it was plainly a US ship flying the US flag and was an ally. He was threatened with court martial if he wouldn't attack.
Israel knew it was a US ship. They wouldn't have attacked it if it weren't a set up.
Now, just who were the US and Israel going to blame for the sinking? Apparently, if a Russian spy ship hadn't come into view, the Israelis would never have stopped the attack.
The plan was a false-flag operation agreed to between the US and Israel sacrificing a US ship and its entire crew so that the US and Israel could blame Egypt. Then the US would attack Egypt. Of course, the war would be widened until the US and Israel could together dominate the region and then Israel alone could come to dominate (for the wrong reason).
Forty years after the attack on the USS Liberty we know exactly what happened. I've interviewed former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, admiral Thomas Moorer, I've interview the admirals that were on the line who heard what president Johnson said. I've even talked to the head JAG officer of the Navy [Judge Advocate General's Corps, the justice and judicial branch of the military] who was ordered to falsify the reports and cover up what had really happened.
One of the Israeli pilots has gone public as well, saying that three times he refused over his radio to headquarters to attack the ship saying that it was clearly an American ship, in international waters, and an ally. He was ordered, under threat of court marshal, to engage the ship.
In a nutshell, this is what happened. President Johnson had personal control over the ship, parked it in the Mediterranean, made a back-room deal with Israel to attack it with an order to kill all aboard. The attack was to be blamed on Egypt. Then the US would then enter the war and take over the entire Middle East.
In the aftermath of the attack, on the most highly decorated ship in US history, the captain and his entire crew were told that they would spend life in prison or be killed if they told anyone what had happened. Captain William L. McGonagle was given the congressional medal of honor in secret and told not to tell anyone that he had won the award....
Alex Jones (a staunch Libertarian) covered that in one of his documentaries. See the footnote for the quotation immediately above for more information on Alex. He has also made a point of emphasizing a number of point about 9-11, such as the following:
On 9-10, the White House phoned mayor Willie Brown of San Francisco and told him not to fly to New York on 9-11. Why?
Ashcroft had stopped flying commercial a couple of months before 9-11 saying that there was a terrorist hijacking risk. Why weren't the people told?
The Joint Chiefs of Staff were warned. On 9-10, they cancelled their meeting planned for New York the next day, 9-11.
Sulman Rushdie was told by the FAA not to fly to New York on 9-11.
As we touched on before, the bin Laden family and their people were flown out of the US just after 9-11. Some one hundred sixty people were allowed to leave the country without investigation. Why were they above suspicion when no one else was?
The US flew some eight thousand Taliban to Pakistan after the Northern Alliances won in Afghanistan. They let Al Qaeda leaders go against the protestations of some of the senior US military operating in Afghanistan. Later, the official US story was that it was a simple mistake.
It was reported in France that Osama bin Laden was in a hospital just months before 9-11 where he was met by CIA operatives for a number of days. We can verify whether or not this is true, but all these things were glossed over by the official investigation into 9-11. The 9-11 Commission was given a very narrow investigative range. Why?
As for letting al Qaeda figures go into Pakistan, that's because the ISI is the CIA in Pakistan. ISI is a branch of the CIA. The CIA through ISI set up the al Qaeda in Afghanistan to suck the Soviet Union into a quagmire there. That's why the ISI chief, Pakistani lieutenant general Mahmoud Ahmad (also spelled Madmood Ahmed), ordered Ahmad Omar Saeed (also spelled Umar Sayed) Sheikh to send a wire transfer of one hundred thousand US dollars to Mohamed Atta of al Qaeda immediately before 9-11. These guys are all double and triple agents.
Before 9-11, an FBI sting operation had discovered the ISI-al Qaeda connection. Randy Glass had been wired by the FBI when a man named Rajaa Gulum Abbas, an ISI agent, works to cut a deal for weapons for al Qaeda and points to the World Trade Center Twin Towers and says, "Those towers are coming down."
No one has done a thing about it. It's been covered up, obfuscated, ignored by the mainstream media, on purpose, to send it down the memory hole. The silent mantra is, "Don't follow the money."
The Pakistanis are in on the whole thing. They have been all along. They are the middle men. They were put in this position long ago when India was close to the Soviet Union and Pakistan was India's enemy. The US took on the dictators of Pakistan as the US ally against the Soviet-India connection, even though technically, India was non-aligned.
Republican congressman Porter Goss was the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and Democratic senator Bob Graham was the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee. They had breakfast with Pakistani lieutenant general Mahmoud Ahmad the morning of 9-11. They were both name to co-chair the Joint Congressional Inquiry into 9-11. Goss was later named CIA director.
This all goes back to Iran-Contra and all the CIA drug running (Mena, Arkansas) into the US to fund covert operations around the world and to run down the opposition within the US: The poor and marginalized and disenfranchised such as the inner-city blacks who became addicted to crack with the pushing by the CIA and the likes of Oliver North.
The CIA, with FBI and DEA complicity, create the drug problem. Then they help create the SWAT teams to go into the areas where they created the problem to further destroy those they consider "uppity n gg rs," meaning the Black people who were supposedly freed at the end of the Civil War and who mostly just wanted to be treated as full human beings. The real subhumans are those who perpetrated these deliberately divisive crimes against unwitting Blacks and Latinos and poor Whites, etc.
What is going on right now in Iraq is part of creating sociopaths be swell the ranks of the SWAT teams in the US once they get back. These people will be asked to do to Americans what they have already done to the Iraqis. That is to say, they will ruthlessly brutalize innocent Americans who are simply peacefully dissenting.
The US creates special forces. Then they create Blackwater mercenaries. Then they swell the police-state forces with desensitized killers and torturers. Welcome to Nazi America in the making.
The dark lord doesn't like dissent from his evil agenda to be the master of the universe.
The money from drugs and illegal, black-market arms sales found its way into the hands of CIA-ISI trained terrorists-agents such as Omar Sheikh Saeed who helped mastermind al Qaeda's finances from the CIA through the ISI and who apparently killed Daniel Pearl if the reports are accurate.
It has been alleged that Mohamed Atta was trained on a US Air Force base. The official investigation into 9-11 didn't follow that lead. It couldn't. It wasn't allowed. It didn't have the money or the time or the personnel or the mandate from the president. Why would it? Why would the president want to be investigated about his involvement in 9-11? He has too much to hide.
July 25, 2000, the DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) in Orlando, Florida (where Jeb Bush, a neocon PNAC member, was governor and had fixed the election for his older brother by removing tens of thousands of Blacks from the voter roles as felonies when they were not) discovered forty-three pounds of heroin on a jet owned by Wally Hilliard. Hilliard's company, Plane 1, leased out the jet.
That same plane flew that same run thirty or forty times, ferrying the same people. And they always paid cash for the rental.
Hilliard also owned Huffman Aviation. Huffman Aviation trained the so-called terrorists, including Atta, to fly planes. Hilliard was never even investigated.
Hilliard's charter service was flying Arabs all over the place without governmental oversight. The foreign passengers and where they were going was not required by the government to be logged.
Florida just keeps coming up over and over. It has to do with the military bases, CIA, Mafia, Cuba, drug running from all over the world, offshore gambling, international black market weapons trading, warm winters, a growing population, all the retirement money, and the legacy of the Confederacy.
Jeb Bush was in the loop as we've said as a neocon member of PNAC who had rigged the election for his older brother. Jeb Bush knew what was coming. On September 7, 2001, he issued an executive order placing all Florida law enforcement under the Florida national guard. He was ready, four days before 9-11, to lock down the people if necessary.
When one starts looking closely at this, one runs into the spider web. All the familiar names and networks start showing up. Iran-Contra and CIA cocaine smuggling, Vietnam and Pentagon and CIA heroin smuggling, Afghanistan and CIA heroin smuggling, and on and on. Illegal arms deals show up. Money laundering shows up. Go deep enough, and human trafficking shows up, as do assassinations, and child sexual sales and slavery and on and on, as depraved as anyone on the outside can even imagine and then worse.
Of course, they (the powers that be) aren't going to look deeply into anything. They are stopped dead in their tracks but threats from the bosses—the people with the most financial control to whom all the trails ultimately lead. The three Kennedy assassinations, Kissinger's crimes, Iran-Contra, 9-11, the Iraq War lead-up lies, and on and on will never be really investigated. They are off the table, history, over, get over it, move on....
The politicians talk up the game leading up to their election, but then they change their tune soon after being voted in or back in. John Conyers has done that concerning the impeachment of Bush and Cheney, which Pelosi and he say is off the table. Dennis Kucinich's office is now saying that 9-11 is off the table. They won't change their minds unless the people demand a change of heart.
What the people really need to do is start a parallel global state that will displace the greedy, violent, and depraved state, through the Real Liberal Christian Church.
Furthermore, the White House fought against the formation of the 9-11 Commission all the way. Once the hearings got underway, the process was transparently designed to avoid exposing governmental negligence, deliberate wrongdoing, or complicity. It was awful for the family members who were frankly treated like dirt. It came across as how dare they (the family members) put their dead relatives above the greedy interests of the Empire and their betters.
The 9-11 Commission was set up deliberately to scapegoat the intelligence community. Whereas, what the people have wanted is a commission to investigate who perpetrated 9-11, following every lead, every single lead, exhaustively, back to its highest source no matter what, not matter where, not matter to whom, it leads, no exceptions.
Philip Zelikow , the executive director of the 9-11 Commission, was an extreme insider of the Bush White House. The families wanted him to resign. He refused. The Commission chairman didn't terminate him either.
Then, the White House stonewalled the Committee by refusing to turn over documents or to allow all the members of the Committee to see those documents, thereby, tying the Committee's hands.
Do you think this wasn't a deliberate cover-up? The White House didn't want people to see the incriminating evidence.
If it weren't for Richard Clarke testifying before Congress and writing a book about the failures of the Bush-43 administration, White House officials would never have testified to the 9-11 Commission. For that, Clarke was roundly attacked by neocons and their sycophant supporters.
Even when Bush agreed to meet with the Commission, he wouldn't do it without Cheney and they wouldn't do it under oath or in open session. They had to keep their stories jibing. Can you imagine how easy it was for them to just say they aren't going to answer anything that they deemed a national security (gangster security) threat.
Also, many people don't remember how the entire White House was saying over and over and over that there were no warnings and that no one could have imagined terrorists flying planes into buildings. However, they all had been well warned repeatedly, so much so that John Ashcroft actually told the CIA briefer that he didn't want to here about it again. Nevertheless, Bush, Cheney, Rice, and others just flat out lied to the American people and the world.
The president's daily briefing of August 6, 2001 , specifically warned that al Qaeda might be planning an attack with hijacked US aircraft. Of course, we now have all sorts of other information about warnings from (continued...click the next page number below)...continues... Click next page number below. [If you would like to see the full text on one page (helps with searching for text on the page), use the .] . . . lower ranking agents about terrorists all over the country including in flight training. We also now have the proof that the government, such as the FBI, blocked investigations before and after and covered up the blockage and destroyed evidence of that cover-up.
Will anything be done, or will the US go to hell?
The Bojinka plot was a 1995 plan by Ramzi Yousef, who planned the 1993 World Trade Center attacks, planned to hijack multiple commercial jets and to fly them into the CIA, Pentagon, and World Trade Center. The US government knew all about it, in fine detail. So when Bush, Cheney, and Rice and FBI director Robert Mueller and others said that the government had no clue even though the CIA was saying that an attack like that was showing up on their "radar," you can be sure they were knowingly and willfully lying with malice aforethought, accomplices in murder for allowing the attacks to happen to send a panic through the people and to give them license to wage war throughout the Middle East and elsewhere.
When George W. Bush said no president wants war, he's a liar. Oh, he may have had mixed emotions about it. As mentioned before though, he had even said that if he got the chance his father had, he'd spend the political capital to wage war on Saddam Hussein until he removed Hussein from power. He relished the thought. It's why the Vulcans backed him, picked him. Many people fall to such temptation, such thoughts. It's common. It's wrong though, and everyone must work to overcome such temptations.
In addition, about a year earlier Niaz Khan is reported to have past two lie-detector test stating that he informed the FBI over a year before 9-11 of the plot to hijack jets and to fly them into buildings in the US. Agents interviewed this willing subject for three weeks. Some agents try to follow every lead, but FBI headquarters drop the investigation and sent Khan to London.
Condi Rice was rehearsed for her testimony to the 9-11 Commission. She said that there was no specific threat or date or method given to the president. Her testimony, of course, came after she had testified to the American people that no one could have imagined such an attack. As one of the 9-11 widows said, to top it off though, the presidential daily briefing said that the plan was to attack federal buildings, it mentions New York as a target, and it mentions hijacking planes and the warning indicators were hot (meaning soon). Therefore, Rice lied.
Now, under the technical mundane law, she wasn't sworn in (on purpose) when she lied to the people. Also, the lawyers could argue forever about what the term "specific" means. That's why they were confident enough to let her go lie to the Commission.
However, The Christian Bible does not make the distinction between being sworn or not by a mundane court of law.
Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths:
But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:
Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King.
Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.
But let your communication be, Yea, yea; Nay, nay: for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil. (Matthew 5:33-37).
Remember, Ashcroft was flying only by chartered jets.
Also, Bush had surface-to-air missiles on top of the resort were he was staying in Florida on 9-11. That wasn't typical back then. The only reason he had those missiles there was because his security people knew there was a threat of a terrorist plane attack.
Also, the top Military brass cancelled their flights for the morning. But the people weren't warned were they.
With all that information, Bush did nothing. He hardened nothing. He beefed up nothing. In fact, the Pentagon time things so that massive war games would be on-going at exactly the same time to throw all the underlings off. His team also had prearranged to make sure WTC 7 came down and until proven otherwise, made the Twin Towers come down too. Why?
Another Pearl Harbor is the answer, exactly what the neocon, false-Zionist PNAC wanted.
Also, as mentioned briefly before, the US allowed Taliban, al Qaeda, and bin Laden to escape in Afghanistan to Pakistan by convoys and by transport planes flying back and forth. It was a massive airlift. We don't mean they just were sloppy about it. We mean they deliberately let them escape.
Osama bin Laden reportedly received dialysis treatment at a hospital in Pakistan where he was met by CIA agents.
The US didn't want bin Laden killed. They didn't want to put an end to the wars. The long war is the goal. Warring is the goal, not getting it over with. The long-term plan is what matters. It is the plan for Satan to manifest. What has been ordained is just unfolding, unfolding, unfolding.
The day after I wrote a great deal about the failures of the 9-11 Commission, I heard Peter Lance put it the following way on Democracy Now!
...there needs to be a real investigation of 9/11, not staffed by alumni of the very agencies that, you know, were asleep at the switch in the years leading up to 9/11. It should be staffed by American citizens, journalists, scholars, widows, the Jersey girls should be on it. It should be fully funded, and it should have subpoena power, because anyone that thinks that in reading the 9/11 Commission Report you've gotten the full story is wrong. No accountability. They never named a single name in the 9/11 Commission Report.
The 9-11 Commission was set up deliberately to undo the work of the Frank Church Committee, which vice president Cheney and former defense secretary Rumsfeld absolutely hated because it thwarted their secret desires (not secret anymore) to take over the world in neocon, false-Zionist, military, megalomaniac fashion.
The outcome of the Commission is the Information Sharing Environment (ISE), exactly what led to the abuses documented by the Church Committee. Now, the ISE is a program where information on vaguely defined terrorists and potential terrorists and terrorist activities is shared internationally (with foreign governments), federally across departments and agencies (no more demarcation of domestic from external), state-by-state (the purposed hubs or nodes across the US; to reduce federal oversight of course), and with privatized, pseudo agencies and private contractors, etc.
Couple all of this with the surveillance society where there are close circuit cameras and listening devices and biometric scanners everywhere along with data-mining by the government and marketing firms and one's life is absolutely no longer private at all.
See ChoicePoint; Acxiom; ReverseGenie.com; ReverseRecord.org; and NetSlueth as examples of marketing and private data collection and mining operations that are even used by the Federal government right over the open Internet.
Look, the FBI can activate your cell phone's microphone even when your cell phone is turned off. You'd have to pull the battery to stop it from broadcasting. They can activate the General Motors' OnStar system microphone in GM cars that have OnStar. Computers with microphones and video cameras are also susceptible.
Don't imagine that your virus protection and firewall settings will keep out the government. The government has secret deals with providers to build in so-called law enforcement backdoors.
They can record your key strokes right through your walls. They can read the electromagnetic signature of what you are doing on your computer. They can record your voice off the glass of your windows. They can see your heat signature through your walls. They can bug your house while you're not there. They can add bugs to the goods you buy in the store. They can quiz your friends, family, neighbors, and employers and employees. They can infiltrate your circles. They can check you in their databases. They can hack into all the records on you. Add all of that together, and you have no privacy.
If they want, they can erase you. It sounds like the movies, but that's the point. Some fiction becomes the reality. It's imaginative anticipation.
Also, all those close circuit cameras can have their images downloaded without anyone even touching the cameras or being on the law enforcement end of the camera link. That means a common criminal or private detective can capture the stream of visuals and audio if the camera is so equipped. Of course, that sort of stuff is only the tip of the iceberg. If the surveillance types, the spies, want to aim all their hardware and software at you, they can listen to everything, see everything, and capture and record and computer analyze everything you do.
Many people have been reporting now for years on the present and coming surveillance society. We are telling you that the plan is where every bit of manufactured material tracks you and eavesdrops on you and where scanners and computers and implants down to the nanotech level simply ingested even without your will or knowledge pattern your every thought even in advance, making pre-thought crime a reality punishable by your fellow human beings, not God. Think of the sadistic possibilities. Think of the God-usurping possibilities. Think of the unscrupulous hackers who could bring cyber viruses on that level.
Thank God that God is beyond this life and all death.
About the bin Laden family being flown out of the US, the following is according to the Wikipedia:
The Carlyle Group is an investment group which includes members of the Bush family and the bin Laden family (one of the richest in Saudi Arabia). George H. W. Bush and bin Ladens were at a Carlyle meeting in a DC hotel the morning of 9/11. While private flights were grounded after 9/11, permission was granted to fly several bin Ladens to a gathering location. They left the US before air traffic resumed. In total, four planes were allowed to leave the U.S. with Saudi citizens when the American airspace was closed...
The Carlyle Group is a merchant bank, a private equity company, specializing in defense contracting. As a private company (not traded publicly, not traded on any public stock exchanges), the Carlyle Group is not subject to the US securities and exchange commission to the extent it would be otherwise.
They have raised billions of dollars from the Saudi royal family and other Arab investors. In exchange for military and other contracts, the Carlyle Group kicks back financing to the royal family in the form of business deals, etc.
The power of the Saudi Kingdom's oil money must not be under estimated. The so-called royal family and their closest relatives make out as bandits while the other citizens of Saudi Arabia watch their prospects spiral downward. With the money they have at their disposal, the royals can bribe anyone, anywhere with millions and even billions that can be spread around. The can buy investigators and buy others to silence people.
As this is being written, the Saudis have managed to get Tony Blair and UK attorney general lord Pete Goldsmith to shut down a British, Serious Fraud Office (SFO) investigation into indisputable fraudulent arms deals between Britain and the Saudi royal family in the largest arms deal in the history of the world at an estimated value of some eighty-six billion US dollars with sales commission in the billions going to both sides in the deal. Some reports suggest a thirty-two percent kickback to the Saudi royal family. Billions have gone missing with arms contractors in Britain and America.
Goldsmith said that continuing the investigation into the massive fraud, "would not be in the national interest," the national interest being illegal arms deals.
However, the real national interest is getting out of all arms deals. The real national interest lies in beating swords and spears (all weapons) into plows and pruning hooks to feed the lambs and sheep, the children, of God, all humanity if they will stop following the essence of evil, the Satanic spirit.
Margaret Thatcher looms large in the origins of the deal, and Tony Blair is mum on what is really going on. No one doubts though that the Saudis have bought him off with threats to cancel deals if the embarrassing investigations go forward. Osama bin Laden is the beneficiary of these news reports. He's been saying for decades that the royals must go. Many in Saudi Arabia agree with him, more in fact than agree with the House of Saud.
CNN reported the following:
In New York, several blocks from the ruins of the World Trade Center, a passport authorities said belonged to one of the hijackers was discovered a few days ago, according to city Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik. That has prompted the FBI and police to widen the search area beyond the immediate crash site.
The FBI and the NTSB both say (official) that none of the four black boxes (one voice record and one flight-data record from each plane) was found a ground zero. We are to believe that all four of these objects, designed to withstand crashes better than anything else in a plane, simply disintegrated or were smelted down completely. Do you believe that? However, we were also to believe that despite this, a passport of one of the on-board terrorists survived the crash in a condition such that one would never suspect it had been through such a crash.
A passport of one of the hijackers had blown out of the fire ball explosion in one of the towers, only the person in the passport reportedly turned up alive. They dropped the story.
Well, according to two New York City firefighters, at least three of the black boxes did survive.
...two N.Y. City firefighters, Mike Bellone and Nicholas De Masi, claimed in 2004 that they had found three of the four boxes, and that Federal agents took them and told the two men not to mention having found them.
... A source at the National Transportation Safety Board, the agency that has the task of deciphering the date [data] from the black boxes retrieved from crash sites-including those that are being handled as crimes and fall under the jurisdiction of the FBI-says the boxes were in fact recovered and were analyzed by the NTSB.
Those firefighters report that they were told by the FBI not to reveal to anyone that those boxes had been found.
You may find it odd that two firefighters would find three of the boxes considering the size of the site and all the debris. Well, one of them has said he was specifically assigned to drive the FBI around and through the site to recover the boxes. The FBI had hi-tech locating equipment to find the boxes. The boxes are supposed to put out a locating beacon.
Withholding of black box records
It was initially stated that no black boxes from the planes were found although workers reported otherwise.14Later it was stated that some had been found but were not readable. Eventually some black box information was released. Given the chain of lies it is highly likely that the released material has been edited to the advantage of the official story and will not be reliable.
Also, consider that just after the crashes, federal authorities confiscated the tape recordings of the conversations between Air Traffic Control and the cockpits of the planes involved and that the contents of those tapes were not given to the public.
It is also reported that six Air Traffic Controllers made a tape describing everything that happened that morning. The FAA took the tape, shredded it, and placed the fragments into different trash receptacles throughout the building. Obviously, the FAA person who did that was told that he must cover up everything about what really happened that morning. He followed orders as a the minion he is, getting his reward now because his time is short.
Why the cover-up? Why ask why? The reason is obvious when all the evidence is added up.
There are so many strange things about this case that it would take many books this size just to begin to deal with them all, such as airplanes making impossible maneuvers, alleged hijackers who couldn't handle little one-engine prop planes let alone huge commercial jetliners, and on and on.
Alex Jones (the zealous Libertarian mentioned previously) has made a number of observations about 9-11 and the power-elites push for world dictatorship. We have interspersed some of our own views with Alex's in the following.
Alex has said that MSNBC investigated the story that many people had been told right before 9-11 that something was about to happen and not to go to work that day or to get out before the attacks happened. It turned out that the rumors were based on facts. People had indeed received the warnings. He cites the following articles: Jonathan Alter. "Trade Center warning baffles police: An 'urban myth' turns out to be true – but what does it mean?"MSNBC. October 12, 2001. When I found it athttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/690989/postsand read what was there, I didn't find that MSNBC had confirmed many cases where people knew in advance of the attacks. I don't know what's missing here. Did Alex just misspeak? The story was about one student. Then I found the verbatim story reproduced on Alex's on website:http://www.prisonplanet.com/Trade_Center_warning_baffles_police.htm.
His entire case doesn't rise or fall on this though.
Larry Silverstein , Silverstein Properties, Inc., put up two hundred million dollars of the total lease for the (continued...click the next page number below)...continues... Click next page number below. [If you would like to see the full text on one page (helps with searching for text on the page), use the .] . . . entire World Trade Center complex just two months before 9-11. He immediately took out a 3.5 billion US dollar insurance policy and received seven billion dollars (double) by winning the argument in court that each plane represented a separate attack, separate insurance claim incidences.
This may have been overturned on appeal. It's hard to keep up-to-date on all currents. It's too bad that the mainstream news isn't vastly superior.
We add that some have reported that Silverstein put up as little as fifteen million dollars of his own to obtain the entire WTC.
The fires were almost out in the towers. The fireman were on the floors saying they could put them completely out with two hoses. The fires in Building Seven were small, yet that building too came down looking just like a controlled demolition, the only steel building in history to do so just from fire.
If the fires were so hot, why were so many people videoed standing, alive, waving for help, on the floors where the fires supposedly were hot enough to bow the steel trusses? People were videoed standing in the holes where the planes went right into the buildings.
Who did the put options (bet their stock values would drop) on the exact airlines, United and American, and only those two that were involved in the attacks?
People were betting that the airlines would suddenly lose a lot of money. Who were they? How much did they bet? Whom do they know? With whom did they meet or communicate? What is the pattern (the organizational chart) that would show up from such an investigation? It wasn't investigated. Would a good detective not follow up on such a thing? A good detective would follow it.
Do you think that the NSA, CIA, DIA, FBI, and others don't have the expertise to hunt down those who did put options? The reason this doesn't happen is because the oligarchs own those agencies.
Those agencies aren't there to protect the grassroots. Those agencies are there to protect the gangsters running the planet for Satan. There is no national security. There is no homeland security. There is only gangster security, but they aren't safe.
They aren't saved. They're going to consolidate, but when they think they've sown it all up, they'll lose it all. God will take it all away from them and give everything to the righteous.
These put options were reported to have been six times the usual amount of such options all within the four days before the attacks. According to investigators, it turned out to be CIA front companies one of which was handled by the number three at the CIA, Buzzy Krongard, an investment banker who had been the chairman of the firm, Alex Brown or (A.B. Brown), a unit of Deutschebank, that placed the options and which has been accused of money laundering, especially of drug money. Once that showed up, the investigation was severely slow or cut off. Two and a half million dollars on the put options has gone uncollected.
9/11-related insider trading was worldwide. It occurred on markets in Hong Kong, Tokyo, Chicago, New York, London and Berlin. Estimates of the total amount of insider trades have ranged from the hundred of millions (CBS), to the billions (Ernst Weltke – Chief of the Bundesbank), to the tens of billions (Andreas von BÃ¼low, former German cabinet minister).
Less you think to quickly discount the Germans being able to have any knowledge of these things, consider that the US is documented as having received numerous warnings from many countries about impending attacks on the US using planes on high profile targets within cities.
1.Â Â Â Â Â Â 1998: Indonesia Gives US Warning of 9/11 Attack?
2.Â Â Â Â Â Â 1999: British Intelligence Warns Al-Qaeda Plans to Use Aircraft, Possibly as Flying Bombs
3.Â Â Â Â Â Â March 1999: Germany Provides CIA Hijacker's Name and Telephone Number
4.Â Â Â Â Â Â August 12, 2000: Italian Intelligence Wiretap of al-Qaeda Cell Reveals Massive Aircraft-based Strike
5.Â Â Â Â Â Â January 24, 2001: Italians Hear of Brothers Going to US for 'Very, Very Secret' Plan, Other Clues
6.Â Â Â Â Â Â March 2001: Italians Advise US about Al-Qaeda Wiretaps
7.Â Â Â Â Â Â June 2001: Germans Warn of Plan to Use Aircraft as Missiles on US and Israeli Symbols
8.Â Â Â Â Â Â Summer 2001: Bin Laden Speech Mentions 20 Martyrs in Upcoming Attack; Other Hints of Attack Spread Widely
9.Â Â Â Â Â Â June 4, 2001: Illegal Afghans Overheard Discussing New York City Hijacking Attack
10.Â Â Â June 13, 2001: Bin Laden Wants to Assassinate Bush with an Explosives-Filled Airplane
11.Â Â Â Late Summer 2001: Jordan Warns US That Aircraft Will Be Used in Major Attack Inside the US
12.Â Â Â July 2001: India Warns US of Possible Terror Attacks
13.Â Â Â July 16, 2001: British Spy Agencies Warn Al-Qaeda Is in The Final Stages of Attack in the West
14.Â Â Â Late July 2001: Taliban Foreign Minister Tries to Warn US and UN of Huge Attack Inside the US
15.Â Â Â Late July 2001: Argentina Relays Warning to the US
16.Â Â Â Late July 2001: Egypt Warns CIA of 20 Al-Qaeda Operatives in US; Four Training to Fly; CIA Is Not Interested
17.Â Â Â August 2001: Moroccan Informant Warns US of Large Scale, Imminent Attack in New York
18.Â Â Â August 2001: Russia Warns US of Suicide Pilots
19.Â Â Â August 2001: Persian Gulf Informant Gives Ex-CIA Agent Information About 'Spectacular Terrorist Operation'
20.Â Â Â Early August 2001: Britain Warns US Again; Specifies Multiple Airplane Hijackings
21.Â Â Â August 8-15, 2001: Israel Reportedly Warns of Major Assault on the US
22.Â Â Â August 23, 2001: Mossad Reportedly Gives CIA List of Terrorist Living in US; at Least Four 9/11 Hijackers Named
23.Â Â Â August 29, 2001: Cayman Islands Letter Warns of 'Major Terrorist Act Against US via an Airline or Airlines'
24.Â Â Â August 30, 2001-September 4, 2001: Egypt Warns al-Qaeda Is in Advanced Stages of Planning Significant Attack on US
25.Â Â Â Late August 2001: French Warning to US Echoes Earlier Israeli Warning
26.Â Â Â September 4, 2001: Mossad Gives Another Warning of Major, Imminent Attack
27.Â Â Â September 7, 2001: Priest Is Told of Plot to Attack US and Britain Using Hijacked Airplanes
28.Â Â Â September 7, 2001: French Give 'Very Specific Information' about Possible Attack on US Soil
Since the World Trade Center had already been attacked in 1993 and since commercial airliner hijackings were a repeated method of Muslims, it surely occurred to the US intelligence and law-enforcement community to be on the look out for planes attacking the towers.
It has been widely reported that some of the other supposed nineteen are still alive. The contention that some are still alive is in hot dispute. However, the identifying of the hijackers so quickly and that the list has remained so fixed must be weighed with the government's ability to set people up, to encourage them and entrap them as fall guys and patsies.
Even if many, or all, of them were on the flights, how they got there, what motivated them, what their individual plans were, and what they actually did has not been officially investigated in any way that makes people confident that the warmongers didn't guide the whole thing.
How did they get into the US? People have publicized the "Visa Express" program that was started in June 2001 just for Saudis full of al Qaeda sympathizers and operatives. All the nineteen are identified by the US and Saudi governments as having been Saudi citizens. The Visa Express program allowed Saudis to travel to the US almost as easily as one travels from one state to another within the US. It was nearly a rubber stamp Visa program for Saudis to enter. Many Saudis traveled to the US without being questioned and with their backgrounds being checked. Then once here, they could travel via private charter planes, etc., so that there would be no audit trail. Was this Visa Express program a deliberate facilitation of 9-11?
Armitage is the insider who agreed to take the hit for leaking Valerie Plame's CIA identity so that Karl Rove would not be forced from the White House. It is the same thing George Tenet did for Cheney-Rumsfeld. It is the same thing Colin Powell did at the UN for the whole group, when he, Powell, knew he was lying to the world for the sake of the Bush-43 agenda to drive the Empire in that certain direction. They spread the blame to obfuscate the prime instigator, to throw the people off.
Remember, the US encouraged the Mujahideen of Afghanistan to go back from Pakistan to retake Afghanistan from Soviet domination. Remember that the US trained the death squads of Central America and elsewhere. Remember the CIA has trained numerous police state secret police in torture and assassination techniques, etc. Remember all the false flag operations and the stay-behind projects especially in Italy. Then weigh whether or not the official US story of 9-11 should be accepted without thorough investigation.
Two of the hijackers had lived in an FBI informant's house San Diego, California. Hijackers may have trained at US Navy facilities as well. We add that it was never sufficiently investigated, because the Republicans have controlled all the investigations to day (Thursday, February 01, 2007).
However, what is allegedly known is that the informant went by the name of Abdussattar Shaikh. His PhD was faked by the US intelligence community. His rÃ©sumÃ© listed him as working as a vice president for American Commonwealth University, which was a dummy or shell started by William Lyon, a retired US Air Force general, chairman of the Republican Party's Team California Victory 2004.
Alex Jones also infiltrated the Bohemian Grove in California.
The same thing behind the Death's Head of the Nazi SS is tied into the Bohemian Grove set. We add that it stems from the Black Sun business. It's the dark side (Satanic). The Bohemian Grove is loaded with pagan worship.
They do ceremonies involving a huge idol in the form of an owl where they simulate human child sacrifices to the idol. They wear long, dark robes with hoods. They process with torches and play eerie sound effects and music. The Grove is apparently loaded with homosexual activity as well. Richard Nixon is even quoted as complaining about the homosexuality at the Bohemian Grove. It is said that anything goes there.
We add that they want others to think of it as just old, rich and powerful men acting like boys again for a few weeks in summer, but it goes much deeper into darkness than that. Many of these men profess themselves to be Christian. One cannot be Christian and excuse such low character where there is no real repentance on the part of those who have participated in magnifying such obvious misdirection and hardheartedness. What have these men been taught by their fathers? What are they, in turn, teaching their sons? These guys are world leaders including the presidents of the US Empire. They owe their worldly success to worshipping the dark side. This is where Skull and Bones comes from. They are pirates. They take what they want. They enslave whom they want. They engage in the sexual depravity they want. They kill and destroy anyone and anything that gets in their way.
There is real racism involved. Prescott Bush was a fan of Hitler. As an underling of his father-in-law, (George Herbert Walker, of Union Banking W.A. Harriman & Co, later Brown Brothers Harriman), Prescott helped move Nazi money and war profits all about the world. He knew all about Hitler and his beliefs, which Hitler yelled out at huge rallies over loud speakers and was broadcast over radio for the world to hear. He worked directly for the biggest Nazi financier, the man, Fritz Thyssen, who arranged most of the Nazi rearmament of Germany (war machine) before WWII. This is something the Bush family has attempted to conceal and deny for decades, but now it has leaked out.
We add that there was a concerted effort at the time (the time the story of Fritz Thyssen having millions of dollars in the US came out) to deliberately avoid naming the names of the firms or directors of those firms in the US. In other words, there was a deliberate hush-hush about naming the Harrimans, Walker, Bush, et al.
This was global business. Profit was the motive. Ethics was at most secondary. Prescott worked directly with his Skull and Bones fraternity buddy E. Roland Harriman, son of robber baron E. H. Harriman. They profited in dealings with IG Farben, the chemical company that later made the gas used in the Nazi death camps. They all knew they were building a huge war machine. They all knew that Hitler was a firebrand who absolutely thought all Jews were a breed worst than disease bearing rats fit for the same end.
Today, its easy for people to buy into feigning ignorance about such things; however, seventy years from now, who will be able to feign ignorance about Bush-43's ordering torture? Everyone knows. Every Republican who voted for him knew and knows. They knew and know he lied the US into the invasion and occupation of Iraq. Well, the same applies to Hitler at the time. The international business men in the highest places with the widest network of secret connections knew full well that Hitler was an extreme racist in favor of eugenics and wanted to make war with an unmatched vengeance.
What do we say now? Do we say that those who facilitated Hitler's rise and rearmament were not culpable but were simply doing legitimate business deals, legal at the time? When we see descendants repeating the same patterns of behavior, are we to believe that they are somehow not of that same spirit?
When you aren't rich, it's easy to fail to realize just how little international borders can mean to such profit seekers. One's final loyalties don't lie with one's country full of grassroots citizens. One's final loyalties lie with gaining power and control and making a profit and to hell with the grassroots, wherever, if necessary. People are less than ants at this level.
Hitler failed, but his model was based upon modelers before him and has been perfected since.
Now back to Alex Jones's points.
We saw how the Republicans mistreated and abused peaceful protesters in New York City during their national convention in 2004. We saw how some two thousand were herded into a contaminated, condemned building and many held without probable cause or due process.
Inside the convention, we saw how they drumbeat the terms about "terrorism" even as their own policies and actions increased the desire around the planet to bring down the United States, at least the current version under those who fit so comfortably in fascist garb.
As for Karl Rove, it did turn out that his father was a practicing homosexual. Alex though quotes that Rove's grandfather was Karl Heinz Rover (or Roverer), the governor of a German state under Nazi rule and the senior engineer of the Birkenau death camp. Some people disagree. Peter Tanzer, who says he is a former professor of philosophy at Long Island University, says it isn't true about Karl Heinz Rover or Roverer. Later, the portion of the story about Rove's grandfather upon which Alex had based his observation was retracted.
According to Wilson, and to Retired U.S. Navy Lt. Commander Al Martin (www.almartinraw.com), Rove's grandfather was Karl Heinz Roverer, the Gauleiter of Oldenburg. Roverer was Reich-Statthalter—-Nazi State Party Chairman—-for his region. He was also a partner and senior engineer in the Roverer Sud-Deutche Ingenieurburo A. G. engineering firm, which built the Birkenau death camp, at which tens of thousands of Jews, Gypsies, dissidents and other were slaughtered en masse.
Not every bad story about Karl Rove is true. Take care not to judge and condemn, because some witnesses lie or are just mistaken and jump to conclusions. The substantiated facts are bad enough.
Also, Arnold Schwarzenegger's father was a Nazi in Austria before it was legal there. He became an officer in the SA.
Californians are about to reelect Arnold Schwarzenegger as governor, this being Sunday, October 15, 2006 as I write this bit. They are ignoring his culpability (deal) in the (continued...click the next page number below)...continues... Click next page number below. [If you would like to see the full text on one page (helps with searching for text on the page), use the.] . . . Enron energy rip-off of the entire state (to the tune of tens of billions of dollars, some estimate it at seventy billion in year-2000 dollars). They are ignoring his racism and sexism. They are ignoring his entire psyche that was built up during his fanatic bodybuilding and decades-long, unrepented steroid use. They are ignoring his unrepentant conspicuous consumption.
We add that Arnold is playing to the judges. He got a lot of practice giving the judges what they were looking for and psyching out his competition during his body-building days. Right now, he is a so-called moderate Republican. He attempted to be socially liberal while being fiscally laissez faire. That didn't work. The people didn't want laissez faire. So he's changed and is now emphasizing social programs more. He had been in favor of abortion, gun control, state-sanctioned homosexual rights, and environmentalism to some degree (ironic when one considers his personal fleet of gas-guzzlers).
Can a person change? Of course. Has Arnold really changed from the highly egotistical, abusive competitor? Has he softened for real? Have the people asked and probed enough to determine? Why isn't it plainer if he has changed? It's beginning to show, but will he change enough, soon enough? Pray for him.
There has been a movement afoot to amend the US Constitution to allow someone not born a US citizen to become the president of the US. The Republicans have been pushing it, because they see political star quality and capabilities in Arnold Schwarzenegger. Arnold certainly has proven better able to rise again in the polls than George W. Bush. He's more expedient, flexible, compromising, interested in popularity, winning over more people (judges).
However, he's no Christian. He used to hand out pro-Hitler literature here in the US during his body-building career. He often referred to blacks as "n gg rs" and derided them in general as being subhuman. He spoke openly of admiring Hitler. He later openly renounced Hitler. Arnold needs to come to Christ and leave Hitler's message far behind.
People have to be allowed to live things down. We aren't our parents or grandparents, etc. Without judging and condemning our ancestors, we must still be able to rise up to overcome. Others must not withhold this. It is evil to withhold people from improving, changing, turning to God, and the like. What one must do though is stand openly for righteousness without equivocation. There is no place for greed, violence, or depravity. This is what those given power must be consistent about.
That cover's much of what Alex Jones had to say through the time of the Republican Convention in New York in 2004.
No one but God in heaven knows everything that went on concerning 9-11: Who, what, when, etc. As we've discussed elsewhere, there is a deliberate compartmentalization that is used for the sake of plausible deniability on the part of those at the top and also to make the investigative trail that much more difficult to follow. Did George W. Bush know all the particulars before the event? It's doubtful. Was he completely ignorant that a false flag operation was under way? No. The question is not whether or not he knew. The same goes for all the players in this vast scheme, this vast conspiracy of greed and lust for power and control, etc.
War truly is a racket. Gangster run worldly governments and work to dupe the people into trusting those gangsters.
Now, what about the Madrid, Spain, train bombings of 3-11-2004? Al Qaeda involvement was never demonstrated. According to an article in The Times (London), the bombers were linked to Spanish security and police.
What about the London bombings of 7-7-2005? The lone bus that blew up was the only bus that was contacted by the police and rerouted to a specific location and then blew up where it was parked. The police admitted that the rerouting occurred but they have offered no explanation. Is that just a coincidence? You have to be in a coma to think that. The police were told to do that by shadowy figures leading to those who knew what was going on and why.
Ten minutes before the bombings, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister of Israel, who was serving in the Israeli cabinet at the time, received a warning from Mossad, the Israeli CIA counterpart, not to go to a planned meeting at a hotel within one hundred yards of one of the tube (subway) entrances where panic hit due to a bombing of the subway train there. Dwell on it. Mossad at the very least had forewarning.
If you want to have a reason to attack Arabs and others in the Middle East, Muslims, etc., so that you can take over, you need pretense, you need to be attacked or you need to attack yourself so that the people will become frightened enough to turn over power to you to do whatever you want in the name of their security that you have deliberately made less secure by deliberately murdering people. God damn that!
Remember also that on 9-11, there were war games going on about hijacked planes flying into buildings. The war game Northern Vigilance took fighters from the East coast of the US into northern Canada and Alaska. Also, when the real attacks were happening, all the people in the military system were confused as to whether or not the events were "real world" or not, meaning were really happening or were just part of the on-going war games. Their radar screens had been deliberately filled with twenty-two blips as part of the war game Vigilant Guardian. That war game also included a simulated hijacking, something NORAD practiced dealing with on a regular basis.
What war games were running 9-11?
- Global Guardian
- Vigilant Guardian
- Amalgam Warrior
- Crown Vigilance
- Apollo Guardian
- Operation Northern Vigilance
The National Reconnaissance Office was also conducting a drill about an airplane flying into its building.
By the time all the war games were terminated, it was too late to stop the planes flying into the Twin Towers and Pentagon. The service personnel who had just been dealing with the war games were not able to make the transition to dealing with the actual event fast enough either.
The US had reportedly scrambled fighters sixty-seven times during 2001 with an average intercept time of around ten to fifteen minutes for all sorts of reasons. If a plane went off course or failed to respond to radio calls, it was checked and escorted if need be by fighter planes. The Pentagon was hit after eighty-five minutes with Andrews Air Force Base only eleven miles away.
This is all despite the 9-11 Commission Report which states the following:
On 9/11, NORAD was scheduled to conduct a military exercise, Vigilant Guardian, which postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union. We investigated whether military preparations for the large-scale exercise compromised the military's response to the real-world terrorist attack on 9/11. According to General Eberhart, "it took about 30 seconds" to make the adjustment to the real-world situation. Ralph Eberhart testimony, June 17, 2004. We found that the response was, if anything, expedited by the increased number of staff at the sectors and at NORAD because of the scheduled exercise. See Robert Marr interview (Jan. 23, 2004).
Now, the questions are "30 seconds" from when and then what?
First, did the Commission take any testimony to corroborate the general's testimony? Did they ask subordinates?
Second, even if the thirty-second duration is a reasonable approximation, it was after they were notified. Was the notification timely?
Third, even if the simulations were ended in about thirty seconds, the jets were all in Alaska and Northern Canada.
Fourth, it took time to adjust from the simulations, and that adjustment really never completely materialized.
All of this must be viewed within the largest picture. It must be viewed within the lies to go into Iraq and all the other lies of the Bush-43 administration. It must be viewed within the lies to go into all the wars of US history. It must be viewed within the stated goals of the US government and its policy makers from the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) and the 1992 Defense Guidance Planning of Paul Wolfowitz, etc. It must be viewed within the context of the notion of Manifest Destiny, the idea that the US is destined to run the whole world because it is the best nation that ever was (American Exceptionalism). It must be viewed within the context of the US history of racism, slavery, extermination and assimilation policies towards the natives (American Indians), acquisitiveness, violence, rabid militarism, sexual decadence (unbridled lusts, all), and utter distortion of the Holy Scriptures and the message of Jesus Christ.
Robert Jensen writes in the Houston Chronicle : "For more than five decades, throughout the Third World, the United States has deliberately targeted civilians or engaged in violence so indiscriminate that there is no other way to understand it except as terrorism. And it has supported similar acts of terrorism by client states."
He could have reached back further. In his new book, The American Empire and the Fourth World , Anthony J. Hall, according to one reviewer, "connect(s) the unspeakable crimes visited upon indigenous people since the conquest by Columbus in 1492 to ... today's so-called war on terror ...."
According to Hall himself, "the imagery of terrorism (has) replaced that of savagery and (then) communism as the main explanatory catch-all to describe the real, illusory or manufactured enemies of the American way of life."
The truth is though that these were "enemies of the American way of life." The so-called savages were vastly more egalitarian and cooperative then the capitalists. The Communists and socialist were a mixed bag all lumped together by the capitalists to destroy both, thereby, killing the egalitarianism of socialism. Now, terrorism has been defined to catch up everyone who disagrees with laissez-faire capitalism and rabid militarism and wars of aggression. The pacifist is the enemy of the state. It is true. Jesus is the enemy of the United States of America. That's why the US will cease to be a capitalist nation.
All of the war games and the rest must also be viewed within the following facts:
First, it took some 441 days before the Commission began when ordinarily it takes just a week or two before such inquiries are undertaken. Does the delay indicate that people are trying to hide things?
Second, the Commission budget was tiny relative to the budgets of other investigative commissions, especially when the magnitude of 9-11 is considered.
Budget? In January 2003, the Bush administration allots the Commission three million dollars. This compares to five million for a 1996 Commission that looked into casino gambling and 50 million each for the inquiries into the Columbia shuttle explosion and the Clinton's failed Whitewater deal. [This extended to the Starr inquiry and Monica.] The dollar amount is later grudgingly raised but never exceeds 15 million.
Third, the Commission promised to address all the concerns of the family members of those who lost their lives or were physically injured, etc., on 9-11. However, the Commission neglected to get to the bottom of a substantial number of questions of those people.
Fourth, the vice-chair of Commission, Lee Hamilton, has a reputation for glossing over things for the sake of the imperial aspirations of the US.
Zwicker makes additional points:
The White House releases only 25% of 11,000 documents requested. It blacks out portions of the released documents, resists requests that the administration officials testify under oath and tries to rush the Commission's deadline.
After a cat-and-mouse game Bush and Cheney meet the Commission. But it is behind closed doors, they refuse to testify under oath, no tape recorders are allowed, no transcript is allowed, Bush makes no opening statement, and those taking notes must submit them to security personnel.
All this is what is called in law 'guilty demeanour'. The behaviour of the White House in relation to the Commission from start to finish only makes sense if the official story is a lie and the truth needs to be kept secret.
Most telling, the war games, the false-flag aspect, must be viewed along with the following, which is far from an unplanned coincidence.
All those war games were about the exact same scenarios as what was actually taking place, just as were the 7-7 bombings in London (terrorist drills were going on there too on 7-7). Simultaneous war games about hijacked planes flying into high rises and the Pentagon slowed things down in responding to those things actually happening. We have heard the supposed NORAD tapes telling of the confusion and the fighters scrambling too late and not being able to find the airliners. The planes (fighter jets) never caught up with, or cut off, or headed off, the airliners that were off course. With all the fancy radar and satellites, etc., they couldn't find the airliners. Do you believe that?
There are people who want to see everything as one conspiracy. Well, on a certain level it is. It is the conspiracy of evil. However, not everyone within that conspiracy is acting in concert. There really are rogues. There really are, what is termed, free agents, in the mundane sense. Spiritually, they aren't free of course.
This does not mean that there are not plans hatched decades in advance and carried out on a massive scale. In fact, playing fourteen moves out in advance in maneuvering ponderous nations with many variables can take many decades.
NORAD practiced stopping hijacked airliners from flying into the World Trade Center Twin Towers fully two years before it happened. George W. Bush and his people blatantly lied to the American people and the world about that. They also lied about the same kind of planning concerning the Pentagon. If they practiced protecting those sites, why did they fail on 9-11? Why were the surface-to-air missiles at the Pentagon not fired ? Who gave the order not to fire them? Why did Bush reportedly changed the order just months before that had previously allowed lieutenant colonels to order shooting down of hijacked planes ? Why had Dick Cheney taken personal command of the Counterterrorism Task Force in July, 2001 but never held a meeting thereafter before 9-11? Why did Bush just sit there in the elementary school ? Why wasn't he whisked away?
Later, Bush lied about having seen the first plane hit the tower on TV at the school before he went into the school room. It hadn't been on TV yet. He made up a story, because he had already known that the US was letting it happen. He couldn't tell the truth, because the truth would put him behind bars for the rest of his life, unless the capital-punishment crowd prevailed upon the courts to sentence him to death. Remember, by this time, he would no longer be the president but a citizen found guilty of treason in the highest degree. There would be no presidential pardons.
What are the odds of war games and drills on 9-11 and 7-7 that call for simulating what real terrorists just happen to do at the same time and without any conspiracy connection? There aren't any such odds. What we mean is that given eternity, it would never happen. It never has happened, it didn't happen, and it never will happen in any universe.
The Pentagon had actually worked up models of the Pentagon building with commercial airliners in pieces in it. They had imagined such an attack and worked out the details. If they did that for purely defensive purposes, why wasn't weaponry placed immediately thereafter to stop just such incoming commercial jets? They put surface to air missiles on a resort for Bush. They certainly could have had the same or better missiles to protect the Pentagon, unless they wanted the Pentagon hit, which they did. There's no doubt about it.
On 7-7, the exact same trains and bus were apparently all part of a simulation. That's really all anyone needs to know to know that it was a government job. It is so obvious that it numbs the minds of hundreds of millions of people who hear it. They gloss over it, because the implications overwhelm them. They cannot cope with the reality that their government(s) could be so satanic.
Think about it. They don't even really care whether or not you know. They are that sure of themselves.
It is exactly what the CIA was doing the morning of 9-11. They were reportedly running a simulation of a plane flying into a building.
Besides the simulation being about the same places and times as the actual bombings (something that is impossible unless the simulations were the bombings, which they were), US officials reputedly stated that the mastermind was an MI5 agent and that the bombs were set off by remote control just as in the Madrid, Spain train bombings.
Also, just as with the put options on airlines on 9-11, some people made a killing in sterling options.
The close circuit television (CCTV) camera recordings have not been released to the public. That's because they don't show what the government have claimed. The government lie so they may have a pretext for the new world order, scientific dictatorship: More CCTV cameras, national ID cards, biometric scanners everywhere, no habeas corpus, and on and on.
The train the government report says the bombers took didn't run that day. The government didn't release information on the explosive used.
They say now that it was TATP. TATP produces no heat or flame. However, people saw flame and were burned. The official statement was that the explosive was mixed in a bathtub so to speak; however, TATP is an apparently hi-tech, high explosive of a military grade. It is highly unstable. How did the supposed terrorists handle it so well? They apparently had to run to catch their train. Does anyone run with nitroglycerin on his back or TATP? Where did they get it?
Also, witnesses testify that they didn't see the alleged terrorists where the bombs had gone off. They also said that people in the areas didn't fit the descriptions of those shown in images released by the police. People's descriptions were also altered in the mainstream media.
Also, people actually there said that the train floor was blown up from underneath. The metal was bent upwards. That couldn't happen from a bomb in a bag sitting on the top side of the train floor.
The camera on the bus was always maintained by the same people; however, the Saturday before the bombings, the CCTV maintenance workers was not the usual contractor. The camera on the only bus rerouted on 7-7 didn't work.
All the so-called terrorist bombers that day bought round-trip tickets.
In addition, one of the alleged cell's group members who is fingered in the US as the mastermind, was a double or triple or more agent. This person, whose name is (continued...click the next page number below)...continues... Click next page number below. [If you would like to see the full text on one page (helps with searching for text on the page), use the  Think about that. Of course, FOX News has been known to let things slip through. Let's not forget that it was Fox News reporter, Carl Cameron who, relying on FBI reports, documented the arrest and expulsion of over one hundred Israeli spies blatantly prowling Pentagon and other government and military facilities between September 11 to December 30, 2001. The story was immediately quashed by Fox and erased from it's website. This Aswat info could be taken on the same level. However, there is really disinformation in the story..] . . . Haroon Rashid Aswat, was globe trotting, and even was in the US when the British secret service requested that US officials leave him alone to operate. When the British were given the opportunity to have Aswat who was being held in Africa after 7-7, the British didn't want him. They didn't want to question or have the supposed mastermind. At the same time, one must understand that this information came out of FOX News.
The CIA and the Israelis all accused MI6 of letting all these terrorists live in London not because they're getting Al-Qaeda information, but for appeasement. It was one of those you leave us alone, we leave you alone kind of things.
FOX is always out to plant anti so-called appeasement seeds. You see here that appeasement is presented as the enemy that was subtly slipped in. Rather, wasn't this Aswat person never a mastermind but rather an al Qaeda agent being manipulated by MI6 as an agent provocateur? The cell members were entrapped and encouraged to do what they would not have otherwise done. Aswat was fed what to do by the shadow government within the shadow government where the real masterminds reside. Wasn't he just a tweak on Atta in the UK?
Remember how the US airlifted al Qaeda, and probably Osama bin Laden, out of Afghanistan after 9-11.
Do you see what is as plain as the nose on your face? Do you see the Empire's false-flag operations in 9-11 and 7- 7 or are you that hypnotized?
They just covered up everything just as all the false-flag events down through history have been covered over but are now being extensively exposed by the Holy Spirit so that there are no more excuses, so that everything is in stark contrast, for choosing one's side: Satan or God.
Just as Bill Clinton tricked the Democrats into moving toward dictatorship through his Democratic Leadership Council, Tony Blair tricked Labour into moving toward dictatorship through his so-called New Labour (new world order dictatorship).
A still frame on 7-7 shows one of the supposed suicide bombers still alive after the bombings.
Tony Blair refused to have an independent investigation. Bush couldn't get away with that, because of the 9-11 family members, especially certain widows, who put on too much heat. The 9-11 Commission was a farce though.
Danny McNamee, Judith Ward, the Guildford Four, the Maguire Seven, the Birmingham Six, and many others, are examples.
What does the pretense allow the British dictatorship to unfold? It has allowed a series of antidemocratic laws to unfold such as the Serious Organized Crime and Police Act of 2005 mentioned in the main body of this work. One cannot demonstrate within one kilometer of Parliament Square. That's the beginning of death of the freedom of assembly, the freedom to protest, the freedom to ask for a redress of grievances, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom visibly to disagree with the government, etc. Out of sight, out of mind. It's part of the move to curtail freedom of conscience.
This plan goes way back. It is the push for sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers who create total awareness and total scientific and technological control and who are no longer constrained by traditional moral or spiritual values.
Fear leads to giving up liberty and privacy and anonymity. It used to be that the police couldn't demand to know anything about you unless you were reasonably suspected in a crime. Checkpoints and roadblocks were only legal if a crime had been committed or a dangerous suspect or suspects were known to be in the vicinity. Now, boarding every airplane is a checkpoint as if everyone is presumed guilty, and they are planning to install checkpoints literally everywhere. Surveillance will be fulltime and everywhere—godlike, but who will watch the watchers?
Of course, Blair lied the UK into the Iraq War just as Bush lied the US into the Iraq War. The Downing Street Memo shows that clearly and plainly for any honest person, any person not under the complete spell of Satan, to see.
When doctor David Kelly blew the whistle, he was later found murdered according to insiders. David Kelly had reported that the Tony Blair government had deliberately "sexed up" the report on Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction. The report is referred to as the "September Dossier."
Of course they had "sexed up" the report. Blair was doing in the UK what the neocons were doing in the US. The Downing Street Memo(s) shows it clearly, irrefutably. It was the same thing as with Bush's infamous sixteen words, based upon the knowing Yellowcake Forgeries, in his State of the Union Address.
It was an imperial conspiracy to drum up the war on terror where the terrorists have been deliberately and painstakingly created by the imperialist who treat the world as a chessboard and the people on it as nothing more than pawns (and in excess at that and in need of being radically reduced in numbers via fabricated wars and famines, etc.). Remember the following:
...the question is this: Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people? And they [the Rockefeller and the Carnegie Endowment] conclude that, no more effective means to that end is known to humanity, than war. — Norman Dodd
The key players in the UK and those who string along are being well paid, promoted, and protected by the dark lords behind the scenes. The same thing has been shown to happen in the US. The FBI agents who covered up for al Qaeda in the US have been rewarded rather than imprisoned.
We aren't advocating punishment but repentance. We only point out that the dissenters who are the messengers of truth are the ones who are punished by the establishment.
In a so-called full, public investigation, the government absolved itself of lying the nation(s) into war and for the assassination of Kelly, ruling it a suicide.
Investigations will no longer be possible, because of the Inquiries Act 2005. That ridiculous and transparent power-grabbing act makes the fox in charge of any inquiry about the fox going into the chicken coop. The minister of the department being investigated has total authority over the investigation.
the inquiry and its terms of reference would be decided by the executive; no independent parliamentary scrutiny of these decisions would be allowed;
each member of an inquiry panel, including the chair of the inquiry, would be appointed by the executive and the executive would have the discretion to dismiss any member of the inquiry;
the executive can impose restrictions on public access to the inquiry, including on whether the inquiry, or any individual hearings, would be held in public or private;
the executive can also impose restrictions on disclosure or publication of any evidence or documents given, produced or provided to an inquiry;
It's asinine, and the British people are standing for it. They don't even see the remnants of the meaning of their vote disappearing for false safety and security. They will be less safe and secure than ever, because they will be under a completely merciless police state owned and operated by the bankers and the Godless and self-styled intellectuals whose souls they have purchased.
Now, before we go further with this, it must be said that the exact place at which government duplicity starts and stops is not possible to tell from the outside. There is no doubt that there is a degree of duplicity. There are many people who jump to so many conclusions that the obvious proof of corruption becomes swamped with superfluous questions. This allows the naysayers to pick out many things to debunk, all the while ignoring those points they cannot debunk and while appearing credible in the eyes of casual observers. This paints everyone who knows that the war games and drills were not mere coincidences but had real, logically irrefutable connections preplanned by human conspirators.
Anyone involved in the real events of that day (the simulation that wasn't) could claim that he was just part of the practice drill to escape detection as really having carried out the operation. Mere coincidence? A conspiracy theory?
This is another of history's wake up calls. It's an alarm going off. The mesmerizers, psychoanalysts, psychologists, psychiatrists, marketing, advertising, and psy-ops specialists have shown the way to trick the people into allowing the forces of mammon to do anything they want. It all stems from disbelief in the real God. The further removed from the real God, the less individual human beings matter. Who cares about the emotions of others? It's a dog-eat-dog world. Everything is competition for survival and for getting to the top of the heap. It's King of the Mountain where the toughest kid, the most ruthless, callous, insensitive, most demonic, can push everyone down off the peak. He can even bully them into serving him. The machinations of men who never grew up enough to stop this behavior are calculable by God alone.
The men who were blamed for the attacks of 9-11 and 7-7 did not set them up. Those who did set them up included people within the government of the US. The question is not whether or not but who. It was all conceived and carried out by government false-flag project planners. There is no doubt about it.
In Iraq, British Special Forces were dressed up as Arabs and out shooting Iraqi police. They were caught by the police and found to have all sorts of bomb-making equipment in their vehicle. The British military did an all-out assault on the police station to free the commandos. The Iraqi police were the allies of the so-called Coalition of the Willing; however, here was an ally attacking allies in an attempt to incite what? The higher-ups in the UK and US were stirring the hornet's nest, exactly what Bush denies.
Who's planting all the roadside IED's in Iraq. Is it really Muslims? Muslims are planting a percentage but certainly not all of them. Who blew up the main Shiite mosque? Was it really Sunnis? Remember, Richard Nixon said that the government says one thing and does another. George W. Bush says he's looking toward the day when Iraq is a stable democracy in the image of American TV of the early 1960's. However, he's knowingly doing something else. War is business even once the people are fully hypnotized in a so-called comfortable American Dream.
What about the Bombay, India, train bombings?
All these operations make one suspicious of all the mainstream history of all the incidences down through the decades and centuries. The fact is, you cannot trust the liar from the beginning.
Wars are the biggest business. What won't a few people at the top do for greed? Scare the people into allowing laws of dictatorship. Kill your own people. Plant fake news. Ask for laws allowing you to go to war with anyone anytime you want and allowing you to torture anyone even little children in front of their parents, even sexually. Spy on anyone, anywhere, using any means, and regarding anything, whether or not the other branches of government and the people say it's illegal. You and only you decide what is legal. That's dictatorship. That's Satan. That's where the evil spirit leads.
Freedom is not being able to speak against a dictatorship by liars. Freedom is fascism. Freedom is not being allowed to dissent. Liberty is regulating protest out of sight and out of mind. That's Orwellian doublethink.
People are very concerned that the collapse of WTC building 7 was not investigated. The lack of investigation feeds into people having a greater suspicion than would otherwise be the case.
Did the war games and drills on 9-11 and 7-7 respectively mean that the WTC was brought down by inside explosives or did the duplicity stop at allowing the attacks or facilitating them or planning them, etc.? Where's the line?
Getting to the bottom of it will tell the people whom and to what degree they may trust. Don't forget the following:
But a certain man named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession, And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it, and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles' feet. But Peter said, Ananias, why hath Satan filled thine heart to lie to the Holy Ghost, and to keep back part of the price of the land? Whiles it remained, was it not thine own? and after it was sold, was it not in thine own power? why hast thou conceived this thing in thine heart? thou hast not lied unto men, but unto God. And Ananias hearing these words fell down, and gave up the ghost: and great fear came on all them that heard these things. And the young men arose, wound him up, and carried him out, and buried him. And it was about the space of three hours after, when his wife, not knowing what was done, came in. And Peter answered unto her, Tell me whether ye sold the land for so much? And she said, Yea, for so much. Then Peter said unto her, How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out. Then fell she down straightway at his feet, and yielded up the ghost: and the young men came in, and found her dead, and, carrying her forth, buried her by her husband. (Acts 5:1-10).
Peter investigated. He probed them. They proved untrustworthy. They were up to no good, something against the church.
The collapse of building 7 was not even mention[ed] in the 571 pages of The 9/11 Commission Report, even though this collapse was, according to the official account, a historic event: the first time a steel-frame high-rise had ever collapsed from fire alone. The latest official report, put out by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, has claimed that the Twin Towers collapsed because the airplanes knocked the fire-proofing off the steel,60 ["60" here is a footnote reference in the original] but it has yet to explain why Building 7, which was not hit by a plane, also collapsed.
The words "brother and cousin" don't prove a controlled demolition. Remember though that it was another cousin of Bush who called the election for Bush on FOX News in 2000 with all the other networks then falling into line on cue. Until questions are answered, rumors and theories will flow about. Since there are proven lies, such as the 9-11 war games and 7-7 terrorism drill presented as mere coincidences and the false-flag killing of Iraqi police and the denials of the secret CIA prisons (finally admitted even by Bush-43) and the forewarning about Katrina, etc., people will continue to suspect other events.
Apparently, Marvin Bush, the president's brother, had been a board member of Securacom, which was the Kuwaiti-American security company for the World Trade Center on 9-11. That company as been alleged to have been involved in a number of unusual evacuations of areas of the Twin Towers and building 7 in the weeks just prior to the attacks.
What will blood-family members do to raise up their family over others? Just look at history. Look at all the empires and monarchies down through the ages. What horrendous things does that spirit do at the direct expense of all non-family? How restrictively or exclusively do they define that family? Whom will they allow to rise? They will allow only those others who will do their bidding, even those of the inferior families, nations, and races.
The 9-11 investigation was not even remotely thorough. The leaders of the investigation themselves even openly complained about the misinformation and being suspicious. Think about that. It is the same thing that happened concerning Pearl Harbor.
There were a series of investigations about Pearl Harbor all of which tiptoed around the fact that the US policy was to let it happen, to even antagonize the Japanese into attacking somewhere, anywhere, at first, but leading them to attack Pearl Harbor.
Remember Polk's war against Mexico and how that got started. Lincoln didn't believe Polk's version for an instant. Remember the Maine in Cuba. That was an inside explosion. Then remember how public relations was used to sell WWI to the American people. Then remember after Pearl Harbor how Vietnam was revved up by the Gulf of Tonkin. Then remember the USS Liberty. Remember all the lies told by various presidents. Remember all the overthrows around the world. Remember all the covert lies. There are hundreds even thousands of examples. Then ask yourself if the dark prince of this world is really a child of light. He is not!
Many, many valid questions concerning 9-11 were deliberately left unaddressed. They were left unaddressed under the guise of, how could anyone think so lowly of the powers that be to question their patriotism, etc. This works well with those who don't want to imagine that the nature of any human being can be so corrupted. It works well with those who want to imagine that to those at the top, their family spirit runs to including the whole nation-state.
Conspiracies are not an all-or-nothing proposition. One is not obligated to believe or defend all the speculation surrounding the suspicion of a particular conspiracy or to believe or defend all suspected conspiracy.
Those at the top absolutely do not place the same value on the lives of others as they place on themselves. The more the sole individually values his or her life over the lives of others, the more that one is possessed by the dark spirit. The negative of that is also true. The more the sole individually values the lives of all others, the more spirit of light. The more the dark spirit magnifies, the more corrupt things are and become. The more the spirit of light magnifies, the more wholesome.
This explains why the Katrina victims have been left by the side of the road even as the president gives speeches designed to tread the line. They are designed to give off some feelings of compassion but without ordering the actual aid. The poor victims of Katrina are seen as inferior and a drain on the industrious.
Concerning 9-11, there were samples of the molten steel left over that have been tested and shown to contain the signature of thermite or thermate used to cut through steel. It is important to note that to-date, we have never seen the argument put forth that such thermite/thermate was used in the clean-up process either. If it had been, it would immediately have been said openly as a direct rebuttal to thermite or thermate residue on the steel. Steven Jones, professor of physics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA, has been in the lead asking for further investigations about this. There are many questions that should be asked and investigated. What are the other ways in which such trace elements could result? What experiments could be run to (continued...click the next page number below)...continues... Click next page number below. [If you would like to see the full text on one page (helps with searching for text on the page), use the.] . . . show how the trace elements could result in the percentages in the actual molten samples? Unless and until such questions are officially asked and answered, the people will not rest.
There are photographs of the main steel columns during the site clean-up that show the tell tale marks of building demolition. The cuts are on the same angle used to cause the walls to fall in the direction the demolition teams want. In all the speculation about the use of thermite.
Is this a spirit of wanting to nail the perpetrators? It is the spirit of wanting the truth for the sake of righteousness, not vengeance.
The greatest evil on earth is capable of evil unimaginable by any other than itself and God who knows all hearts. What are you willing to put passed the greatest evil of human kind?
There is money to create. There are lands to take. There are competing genes to wipe out. This is the materialist-bloodline-ego-is-everything mentality.
There's also the seventy-billion dollar California, Enron -related, electrical rip off with all the evidence disappearing in WTC7.
Where's the missing 3.4 trillion dollars from the Pentagon budget? Much of it has been spirited away into private estates that have given nothing for that compensation. It has been stolen, plain and simple. Of course the Pentagon is nothing but theft on a certain level.
Where's all the gold that was stored under the Twin Towers? Gold values are going to go up dramatically if the dollar continues falling. Who has that gold? Who's going to gain at the expense of the people.
How much oil has been taken under control from Iraq if the US stays in control? Some people say it was well over three trillion dollars worth at the time of the invasion, but prices have gone up since then. It's also worth much more than that when the value to the US of denying China that oil is factored in.
China is cut oil deals all over the world. It doesn't have nearly the stringent requirements the US has concerning political stability and economics/accounting. They are in a hurry, and don't care how they get their oil. Considering how lax the US has been in its political/economic dealings, that doesn't bode well for China at all.
This is what the war in Somalia is all about. It's for the control of African oil. The Horn of Africa, which widens out into Sudan, is showing more and more oil potential. Fighting al Qaeda and undertaking humanitarian/peace keeping efforts will be the cover for militarization for the sake of Western/US energy corporations.
Yes, there are imperialist Muslims. There is no doubt about that. It is a war of Empire, but it doesn't have to be. It doesn't have to exist. It doesn't have to be the created reality. It isn't the best path. Bush and Cheney and bin Laden and others are all deceivers.
So, will they stop at attacking Iraq? Will they attack Iran, Syria, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba (has oil too), and even Russia and China? They will own the earth and space. They will own the matter and energy in all its forms and forces. They covet the kingdom by force.
One might be tempted to imagine that Russia's and China's nuclear deterrent would be enough to stop the US oligarchs. Well, the US militarists fully intend to leapfrog a generation of weapons that will render that deterrent obsolete.
The Russians and Chinese know this and are working on the equivalent of hacking the US military's system. They are advancing asymmetrical approaches so that their lower funding will not prevent them from countering US perceived military hegemony. The Russians in particular are extremely adept at this.
For a brief period, the US was the only nation on the planet with nuclear weapons. It is the only nation that used them. Well, when it jumps into a new era of weapons, it won't fail to use them to deny any other nation the ability to obtain them for its global oligarchical purposes.
This is the whole idea behind the false conservative use of the term "useable nuclear weapons." It is what is behind all the planned space-based particle-beam weapons.
Look at all the lies, all of them, not just about one day here or there but the entire pattern of lies motivated by lust in all its forms. Look at those who hate the real Jesus, the Jesus of anti-lust for all but unselfish love. He had a great, infinite, lust for unselfish love.
What spirit murdered him, why, and where is that spirit today? Is it on the left, on the right, in the middle? Yes. Who hates unselfish love in action? There you will find the predators and their witting and unwitting accomplices.
Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton: Selling theirbookor in earnest?
Don't forget that the 9-11 commission's chairmen, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, pointed out in their book that the commission was fed so many misstatements by the government that they, the commissioners, were considering a new commission to look into the possibility of intentional deception by the government. Does this mean that they really think there ought to be such a formal investigation.
It is a way to keep the door open to them after the fall of Bush/Cheney. They want their book as something to which they may point to say they were really on the side of the people.
However, Lee Hamilton is a dyed-in-the-wool imperialist.
Kean really didn't go out on the limb either. He didn't raise the stink right in the middle of the Commission. He didn't make demands and then stick to his guns until they had to drag him out of his chair. He was willingly played.
About the trillions (in year-2000 dollars), who was in charge?
Many people are very concerned about Dov Zakheim, who was in charge of Pentagon accounting. Zakheim is an extreme false Zionist rabbi. He is a signing member of the PNAC, that pointed out the need for another Pearl Harbor. He is also tied directly to some very hi-tech companies producing remote control systems for airplanes, which feeds into what some see as the theoretical possibility that the airliners were remotely controlled and guided into the Twin Towers and Pentagon.
Autopilots can handle a plane's entire flight including landing. Controlling such an autopilot remotely would not be difficult for military drone-experts to handle.
In addition, the place at the Pentagon that sustained the most damage was allegedly an accounting section.
Don't forget that the WTC building 7 was home to many government entities including those with information about clandestine operations, etc., and federal investigations of corporate securities fraud.
If you're going to have a massive conspiracy, you may as well destroy as much of the audit trail concerning previous crimes as possible.
How far are people such as Dov Zakheim willing to go for their bloodline? How does someone with dual citizenship, dual loyalties, become the comptroller of the Pentagon? It shouldn't matter. There shouldn't be a Pentagon.
SPS International; System Planning Corporation; Flight Termination System (FTS); Tridata Corporation
Zakheim, just before becoming the Pentagon's comptroller, was CEO of SPS International. SPS is part of System Planning Corporation. The reason this raises questions is because System Planning Corporation has developed Flight Termination System (FTS). This is a remote autopilot system that can't be overridden by hijackers. It could be used to guide a plane into a high-rise or anything else. Also, an SPS subsidiary called Tridata Corporation is reported to have overseen the investigation of the 1993 bombing of the WTC. Tridata then had intimate and detailed knowledge of the WTC.
It isn't unfair to repeat the questions of others here when there is the 3.4 trillion dollars unaccounted for at the Pentagon under the accounting watch of a false-Zionist, militant fanatic with dual citizenship. Where's the money? 
Where's the money? Where's the money? Where's the money? The American people want it back.
Now, people in high places within the military-industrial complex are going to come and go from such companies. Brothers and cousins of presidents from families going way back in high politics and business and finance are going to be around major financial and military targets, where the money is, where the contracts are, etc. The question is just how far wrong have they gone and will they go. The Empire is being run by Machiavellists, Straussians.
No doubt some of the questions could be put to rest. Everything being thrown out there by people who doubt the government's official version is not one hundred percent correct. That's obvious, since there are conflicting statements from so-called eyewitnesses. Much of what is being put there though is understandable speculation especially in light of Bush's manipulations of the language over Iraq and his gross neglect of the people devastated by Katrina. He isn't trustworthy. It gets to the point with some people that if Bush says something, anything, the opposite must be the truth. With some people, he isn't even given the credit of telling half-truths.
There are people who don't believe the US landed on the moon. There are people who believe the earth is really flat, that evolution doesn't exist, and that the Nazis didn't have any death camps. That doesn't prove that every last thing the 9-11 Truth Movement has said is wrong. False flag operations have really happened. The US has engaged in them. Israelis have engaged in them, as have the UK and others.
Do the superrich own the mainstream media to pay writers and others to produce counter propaganda? Absolutely. Should everything one faces coming out of the mainstream and alternative media be considered in light of the power of selfishness to bend, twist, obscure, and obfuscate? Yes.
If the government goes at this piecemeal and fails to address every question that has circulated within what is being called the 9-11 Truth Movement, then that government will leave even correct explanations as meaningless. What we mean is that the unaddressed issues will be seen as those that the government deliberately avoided because the government was afraid to address them.
Remember, the names of the hijackers were apparently not on the flight manifest. The FBI has said that it has no proof that the alleged hijackers in fact did the act. Also, the government has refused to release the airport security video of the hijackers boarding the planes. In addition, the 9-11 Commission refused to trace the funding for the attacks. Pakistan's security chief had ordered some one hundred thousand dollars be wired to Atta, the supposed terrorist cell chief. Nobody has investigated that. Why not?
Concerning the put options on the airlines, the 9-11 Commission said those who purchased the put options didn't have connections with al Qaeda. That's impossible. That's what should be investigated. That's the point of looking into leads in criminal investigations. The Commission didn't do a thorough job. It did a terribly slipshod job. It was designed for that.
Also, the Pentagon attack area was filmed by security cameras in three locations. That film was immediately confiscated by the FBI, and the US government has refused to date (Saturday, September 09, 2006) to release it to the public. Some footage from the Pentagon's parking lot has been released. What are they hiding?
These questions point to an international orchestration that cuts across all known ideological and religious boundaries. They point to some group and someone who is working people off one another, someone higher up than the president. Woodrow Wilson spoke directly of it after the Federal Reserve Act was passed, which he regretted deeply if he is to be believed as speaking sincerely. And John Kennedy spoke directly of it just ten days before he was murdered.
Why do people strive to reject even the obvious impossibility of coincidence that are the war games of 9-11 and the terrorist attack drills of 7-7? They cannot allow their minds to think these things, because they are such disturbing and discomforting thoughts. People really want the comfort of randomness. If there is no sinister controlling force, if everything bad that happens is just chance, then one can just go blithely on one's way without having to confront the issue of radical evil and its implications concerning one's soul. Those who wish people to move on, to not dig for the truth, to allow those others to continue pulling the strings on both sides even all sides for their own gain at the expense of all others if necessary, those people want everyone else to not be able to see the undeniable truth in the pattern of events. They put their vast sums of money into paying people to come up with ways of convincing the rest of humanity not to discover the conspiracy, not to catch them, not to stop going along with them. Remember, the tobacco-rich paid the scientist to lie and the scientists lied. They paid the public relations (psychologist) people to lie and the public relations people lied. It's all psy-ops.
If you believe those who constantly say that there are no conspiracies and that everything is random and chance, then the next time some group commits a crime you'll need to believe that they didn't. There was no crime, because there was no plan that they pulled off or tried to pull off. There was no crime, because there are no conspiracies. You know better than that. The thing these people are depending upon is the psychology that says the people find it exceedingly difficult to accept that others could be so evil as to allow for the deaths of several thousand of their fellow citizens for their personal gain.
Remember, Roosevelt ordered the top military not to prevent a solid Japanese hit on Americans. Remember, Johnson recalled the fighter jets flying to save the USS Liberty. Those were Democrats. Do you think Republican George W. Bush and his crowd of liars would do any different? Americans don't matter. Bloodline matters. The false Zionists are fanatics about mundane bloodline. Some of the old families of Europe are likewise fanatic about bloodline. It's everything to them. Think about it. That spirit is what's wrong with everything.
Look, all the wars conducted under the leadership of supposed great men are all due to being led astray. This is why it matters that so many of the leadership is simultaneously involved in antichrist secret societies. Such societies go hand-in-hand with warfare and the rest of evil. Franklin Roosevelt was a Shriner (at least a 32ndor 33rddegree Freemason or member of the Knights Templar). Truman was apparently a 33rddegree Freemason while being an avowed Baptist. It's confusion. One cannot combine the wide and narrow path.
That's why we have started this Real Liberal Christian movement.
Can it be put to rest by thorough fishing expeditions? How much money and time and effort would it be worth? Should it have a blank check? Should it be able to develop investigative teams and individuals to follow all the leads just the way the best criminal investigators do? The US has already spent over three hundred billion dollars in Iraq. There is also the 3.4 trillion dollars to track down. What's it worth in dollars? What's it worth in truth for the sake of posterity and to set the nation and the world in the right direction?
Vengeance should not be the motive for anything. Truth should be the motive. Peace and love should be the motive.
Can the church engage in this? Real Christians cannot engage in coercive ordering of the world of mammon.
There have been plenty of rebuttals to the 9-11 Truth Movement. First of all, it is important to remember that only a few of the assertions of people in the 9-11 Truth Movement need to be correct. No one has to agree with every assertion, and knocking down one assertion does not constitute knocking down all of them.
Demolition professionals always blow the bottom floors of a structure first, but the WTC tower collapses began at the upper levels, where the planes hit the buildings.
There are people sophisticated enough in demolition and computer science to rig a collapse using a computer to control the sequence of explosions beginning on any floor.
What is also telling about this statement is when it is applied to Building Seven of the World Trade Center. Building Seven started to come down from the bottom up.  It imploded, so none of the explanations for the steel and concrete dust concerning the Twin Towers may be used to refute that Building Seven was brought down by controlled demolition.
Demolition firms had very sensitive seismographs operating at other sites in Manhattan on September 11. None recorded any explosions during the tower collapses.
However, everyone at the scene heard and felt explosions. The State Department just ignores that. Also, there is still an unresolved conflict about the data.
Clean-up crews found none of the telltale signs of controlled demolitions that would have existed if explosive charges had been used.
However, I've seen video showing steel columns still standing in the debris and showing the exact same signs (angle) and melting (waxing) of cutting that results in controlled demolitions.
Cutting away walls, insulation, plumbing, and electrical conduits to place numerous charges on the towers' structural columns in advance would not have gone unnoticed.
However, people who occupied the building did complain of construction noises and excessive dust leading up to the collapses.
Concerning Building Seven:
This allegation was fueled by a comment by the WTC owner that, after WTC 7 was judged to be unstable, he recommended pulling a group of firefighters out of the building, using the phrase "pull it" in reference to the contingent of firefighters. For more details, see 9/11 Revealed?
Conspiracy theorists have interpreted the "pull it" remark as slang for demolishing the building with explosives. But demolition experts say "pulling" a building means attaching long cables to a weakened structure and literally pulling it down with bulldozers and other powerful machinery – not using explosives.
Alex Jones has a video showing a worker saying the WTC clean-up crew was about to "pull" building six. Some people say the building was then brought down with cables. Who's right, and what would it mean if the building was pulled down using cables? Would it mean Alex Jones deliberately concealed it or was just carelessly and should have checked?
These sorts of issues arise because of the proven history of governmental stonewalling and lying. When the government deliberately covers up and misleads, which it has been proven numerous times to have done, then speculation and conjecture mounds up to include a sea of far-fetched thoughts. Then, the cover-up and disinformation artists work on knocking down far-fetched ideas while continuing to evade the questions the answers to which would conclusively demonstrate governmental culpability.
Nevertheless, the "pull it" comment by the WTC leaseholder is far from the only reason people suspect controlled demolition.
The root of the six-fold volume of put options in the week before 9-11 and on airlines involved has never been explained. The FBI has simply said the trading was innocuous. However, if the FBI were to have put one or two people on that issue alone and to exhaustion, an obvious question would have been, how often has such trading volume ever happened without being traced to insider trading (a fix). What are the identities of those who did not collect on their options? What connections did they have? What was the original rationale given by trading advisors who recommended the put options and was that rationale baseless?
The 9/11 Commission investigated this issue in detail, concluding, "Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation."
For example, it stated, "much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American [Airlines stock] on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades."
Well, why did they (continued...click the next page number below)...continues... Click next page number below. [If you would like to see the full text on one page (helps with searching for text on the page), use the.] . . . recommend the trades? What made them think the airlines' stock would go down? Just because someone isn't an al Qaeda member doesn't mean that he or she isn't fronting for the CIA or others with insider information on a pending attack. The CIA monitors trading as part of its intelligence gathering, because they know that insiders want to cash in. The CIA sees it as a prognosticator. Who followed up on this newsletter? Who owns it? Whom do they know? Why hasn't everyone collected? The explanations of "just trust us, we looked into it," are designed for those who are too easily satisfied that the government is not once again stonewalling and lying as they have done concerning all the governmental crimes documented in history beyond the point where the government even denies those crimes.
The government couldn't deny Watergate, the secret bombing of Cambodia, Iran-Contra, MKULTRA, and on and on. It couldn't deny smuggling cocaine. It couldn't deny COINTELPRO. It is still denying as of this writing that it deliberately lied to get the US to go to war against Iraq, but who doesn't know for a fact that they deliberately lied?
Bin Laden: The Forbidden Truth was published in France by Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, documenting media reports in publications like the Times of India that the US government had told numerous allies it was going to invade Afghanistan several months before 9/11. (Italics added).
We have documented the long list of nations who were warning the US of an impending attack, some fairly specific, mentioning planes and New York buildings. There were human beings, leaders and analysts, with personal investments on the other end of those warnings. Any of those with detailed enough information could have been linked to the trading that went on all over the world. It was not all innocuous trading. That's just propaganda.
There has been a concerted effort to avoid a citizens' investigation sufficient to either substantiate or refute the theories. The only reason to avoid such an inquiry from the mundane perspective is to avoid exposure of culpability that would be uncovered no matter how deeply buried.
It must be remembered that the false-flag operation does not rise or fall on the controlled-demolition theory, or the no-planes theory, or the pod-planes theory, etc. One website calls the no-planes and pod-planes theories "the poison pills" and characterizes them as follows:
Get the US involved in wars to effect changes domestically is as old as the US. The plotting happens in secret meetings held by the economic elite. The point is economic domination of the planet by the plutocracy and oligarchy within the plutocracy. The ultimate object is total control. We have seen in the main body of this work how WWI and Pearl Harbor were fostered by the US government to alter the perceptions of the bulk of the US public. Added to the events was all the popular propaganda and hype, especially in the form of newsreels and movies, since the majority of people didn't read in depth. For the readers, there were the corporately controlled newspapers, etc. The public was not privy to the contents of the closed meetings held by the elite.
Read and consider the following concerning WWI:
We are now at the year nineteen hundred and eight, which was the year that the Carnegie Foundation began operations. And, in that year, the trustees meeting, for the first time, raised a specific question, which they discussed throughout the balance of the year, in a very learned fashion. And the question is this: Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people? And they conclude that, no more effective means to that end is known to humanity, than war. So then, in 1909, they raise the second question, and discuss it, namely, how do we involve the United States in a war?
Well, I doubt, at that time, if there was any subject more removed from the thinking of most of the People of this country, than its involvement in a war. There were intermittent shows in the Balkans, but I doubt very much if many people even knew where the Balkans were. And finally, they answer that question as follows: we must control the State Department.
And then, that very naturally raises the question of how do we do that? They answer it by saying, we must take over and control the diplomatic machinery of this country and, finally, they resolve to aim at that as an objective. Then, time passes, and we are eventually in a war, which would be World War I. At that time, they record on their minutes a shocking report in which they dispatch to President Wilson a telegram cautioning him to see that the war does not end too quickly. And finally, of course, the war is over.
At that time, their interest shifts over to preventing what they call a reversion of life in the United States to what it was prior to 1914, when World War I broke out. At that point, they come to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, we must control education in the United States. And they realize that is a pretty big task. To them it is too big for them alone.
So they approach the Rockefeller Foundation with a suggestion: that portion of education which could be considered domestic should be handled by the Rockefeller Foundation, and that portion which is international should be handled by the Endowment.
They then decide that the key to the success of these two operations lay in the alteration of the teaching of American History.
...exposure of this Carnegie Endowment story, and the Ford Foundation, and the Guggenheim, and the Rockefeller Foundation — all working in harmony toward the control of education in the United States.
These policies are the foundations' allegiance to these un-American concepts; these policies are all traceable to the transfer of the funds over into the hands of Trustees, Mr. Griffin. Those Trustees were not the men who had a hand in the creation of the wealth that led to the endowment, or the use of that wealth for what we would call public purposes.
Those are the words of Norman Dodd concerning the official minutes of the Foundation. They are very telling.
The thrust of the educational changes is to lead the planet into a scientific, financial, intellectual-elitist, spiritless, corporate consolidation under the global oligarchs where all other human beings below are theirs to do with as they wish, including exterminating them by the billions.
According to David Rivera, at a June 1991 meeting of the Bilderberg Group "...at the Black Forest resort in Baden Baden, Germany, they discussed plans for a common European currency and European central banking; and reviewed Middle Eastern events and developments in the Soviet Union. David Rockefeller said during the meeting:
We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years ... It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during these years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational [sic: should be supranational] sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.
We don't know where David Rivera obtained this alleged quote. If it is real, it shows the complicity of the corporate mainstream media that is supposedly (has represented itself to be) the fourth estate, the watch dogs of democracy. Of course, even if the quote is inaccurate, the fact remains that the corporate media in question is owned and operated by those with the agenda of David Rockefeller as expressed in the quote (real or not). We know this by their fruits.
It isn't difficult to tell that the media is controlled by the people who are in the Bilderberg Group. The group meets every year, but the media doesn't report it. Some one hundred twenty of the most powerful and wealthiest people in the world meet each year, but the meeting isn't covered in the news at all. What other power in the world could do this? The Bilderberg doesn't even have to try to cover it up. The mainstream media just wouldn't dare go against them. Heads would roll, literally if it came to that. War is nothing to this group but a profit center.
Let us not forget Operation Mockingbird. The Church Committee exposed the CIA propaganda operation in 1975-76.
...a program to influence the domestic and foreign media. Wisner recruited Philip Graham (Washington Post) to run the project within the industry. According to Deborah Davis ("Katharine the Great"): "By the early 1950s, Wisner 'owned' respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles."
In 1951, Allen W. Dulles persuaded Cord Meyer to join the CIA. However, there is evidence that he was recruited several years earlier and had been spying on the liberal organizations he had been a member of in the later 1940s. According to Deborah Davis, Meyer became Mockingbird's "principal operative".
In 1977, Rolling Stone alleged that one of the most important journalists under the control of Operation Mockingbird was Joseph Alsop, whose articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists alleged by Rolling Stone Magazine to have been willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James Reston (New York Times), Charles Douglas Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs (The Miami News'), Herb Gold (The Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times). According to Nina Burleigh (A Very Private Woman), these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by Frank Wisner. The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work.
After 1953, the network was overseen by Allen W. Dulles, director of the Central Intelligence Agency. By this time Operation Mockingbird had a major influence over 25 newspapers and wire agencies. These organizations were run by people with well-known right-wing views such as William Paley (CBS), Henry Luce (Time Magazine and Life Magazine), Arthur Hays Sulzberger (New York Times), Alfred Friendly (managing editor of the Washington Post), Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star), Hal Hendrix (Miami News), Barry Bingham, Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal), James Copley (Copley News Services) and Joseph Harrison (Christian Science Monitor).  [internal-article footnote numbers removed to avoid reader confusion]
Many of these people and others working for and within the CIA were leftwing, even socialist and Communist Party members at one time or another. Joseph McCarthy was right about that, but he was just wrong in his tactics and hatred for egalitarianism. Nevertheless, the CIA destroyed McCarthy at the insistence of the global elite such as David Rockefeller and others.
Cord Meyer, for instance, Mockingbird's "principal operative," had started the Committee to Frame a World Constitution, which was dedicated to forming a world federation under the global elite of bankers (the global oligarchs) headed up by front man, David Rockefeller.
There are those, of course, who will say the media were just being loyal, patriotic Americans. Well, since that's the case, they weren't doing the job of real investigative reporting for the sake of an informed, democratic public. Of course, a free press is free to dupe the public. What is needed is a democratic press.
All these self-styled news sources are connected with the world oligarchy and the oligarchy's instruments of control such as its societies that hold top-secret meetings. They do major bug sweeps wherever they meet and make clear to people what will happen to them if they leak the contents of meetings. You will notice that the government leaks like a sieve (deliberately) while nearly nothing ever leaks from the secret meetings of the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Committee, and the like. They are beholden to the oligarchy for their bread and butter, they falsely imagine.
One Libertarian, Daniel L. Abrahamson, puts it this way:
Puppets like Horowitz, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity, Michele Malkin, William Kristol, William F. Buckley and their kin serve as Right Gatekeepers. They criticize the failures of liberals and Democrats and then call for Bush worshipping, illegal wars, fascist government, and giving up all of our Constitutional rights for "security." In doing so they pollute the conservative movement and help marginalize true conservatives voices like Alex Jones, Ron Paul, and groups like Gun Owners of America.
Chomsky and his gatekeepers do the same thing. They write about the crimes of American imperialism and then call for population control, gun control, global government under the UN, and a totally socialized Brave New World society.
The Left gatekeepers must manage the delicate tight rope act of appearing radical while in actuality calling for worldwide enslavement and murder. In all likelihood they get a little help from the propaganda scientists at the venerable Tavistock institute in London and adjuncts of the CIA's Mockingbird program; clearly the Left's denial of 9-11 truths has been too coordinated too have simply been a freak occurrence.
In the mainstream it is the same with the staged battles between pawns like Democratic operative Al Franken and Republican Ann Coulter.
All of this is designed to create a tight spectrum, a masterfully crafted false paradigm to enslave the mind and give the people false choices. Thus at either extreme of the spectrum and all points in between, from Chomsky to Horowitz, one finds they are endorsing total enslavement and global government. This is the genius of the New World Order, their complete castration of free political will through carefully managed propaganda agents. The rest of the media jackals serve as willing accomplices, mere useful idiots and power hungry sycophants with massive egos and more concern for their career than the truth.
There is much truth in this; however, it isn't close to the kingdom of God. Daniel wants his guns. He is prepared to maim and kill people for his version of freedom, a false freedom enslaved to violence and, therefore, the ultimate death of the soul. He must rise above such selfishness and trust in God beyond the mortal flesh.
We must also remember what Norman Dodd told G. Edward Griffin in 1982 concerning the Carnegie and Rockefeller Foundations as follows:
"Mr. Dodd, we [the Carnegie Endowment] have asked you to come up here today, because we thought that, possibly, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of foundations such as ourselves."
And, before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on, and voluntarily stated, "Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here, have had experience either with the OSS [CIA] during the war, or with European economic administration after the war. We have had experience operating under directives. The directives emanate, and did emanate, from the White House. Now, we still operate under just such directives. Would you like to know what the substance of these directives is?"
I said, "Yes, Mr. Gaither, I would like very much to know." Whereupon, he made this statement to me, "Mr. Dodd, we are here to operate in response to similar directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States, that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union."
Well, parenthetically, Mr. Griffin, I nearly fell off the chair. I, of course, didn't, but my response to Mr. Gaither then was, "Oh, Mr. Gaither, I can now answer your first question. You've forced the Congress of the United States to spend a hundred and fifty thousand dollars to find out what you have just told me." I said, "Of course, legally, you're entitled to make grants for this purpose. But, I don't think you're entitled to withhold that information from the People of this country, to whom you're indebted for your tax exemption. So why don't you tell the People of the country just what you told me?" And his answer was, "We would not think of doing any such thing."
Again, we say over and over that it isn't whether or not world government, it's what kind. Merging is good or bad depending upon the principles under which a merger takes place and the degree to which the merged entities will adhere to the principles.
The gospel is a message of the final manner of ordering the human souls of heaven and earth. It is one governing body. It is unified. What it is not is coercive or coerced.
Civil libertarians, anarchists, socialists, and even Marxists share many tenets in common with each other and with Christ; however, Christ is against any entity exercising coercion.
Christ did not tempt God. What Christ did was his best to separate out those worthy of salvation from those who reject godliness. He did his best to show the redeemability, the reachability, of human kind.
Christ knew and knows that humanity is a temptation for God. Humanity tempts God. Humanity represents a noisy, quarrelsome brood that tempts God to intervene in a very angry way. People pray to God to wipe each other out, some not without justification but always and obviously without remembering enough their own sins and, therefore, lack of sufficient faith.
Here, it must be pointed out what has been said by mundane libertarians about the mundane left as follows:
In his book "The Conspirator's Hierarchy," Dr. John Coleman named Chomsky as a deep cover CIA agent working to undermine social protest groups. Certainly Dr. Coleman's claims appear validated by an honest review of Chomsky's role as a Left gatekeeper.
Since 9-11, he has steadfastly refused to discuss the evidence of government complicity and prior knowledge. Furthermore, he claims that the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Bilderberg Committee, and Trilateral Commission are "nothing organizations." When critiquing poverty, he never mentions the Federal Reserve and their role in manipulating the cycle of debt.
Similarly, he claims the CIA was never a rogue organization and is an innocent scapegoat; that JFK was killed by the lone assassin Lee Harvey Oswald; that the obvious vote fraud in 2004 did not occur; and that peak oil is real and good for humanity.
What he does advocate is population control, gun control, support for U.N.E.S.C.O., and the end of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government under the UN. In other words, the major goals of the New World Order.
Chomsky's role in propaganda paradigm is much like that of Karl Marx: to present a false liberation ideology which actually supports the desired solutions of the elite. Marx pointed out the inequalities and brutality of capitalism and then advocated a one world bank, army, and government with the abolition of private property and religion; in other words, the major goals known of the New World Order.
Tens of millions of activists worldwide still remain trapped by this scam, failing to recognize the inherent autocratic and elitist structures of Marxism-Leninism or the newer incarnation under Chomsky.
The Globalist elites and their army of social scientists at the Tavistock Institute understand that people are going to question the inequities of the current economic system. For example, why is wealth distributed so unequally between classes and countries? Why are those living in third world nations allowed to (continued...click the next page number below)...continues... Click next page number below. [If you would like to see the full text on one page (helps with searching for text on the page), use the.] . . . die from preventable diseases and starvation? Why does the U.S. government sponsor and direct such murderous foreign policy? Why was America attacked on 9-11?
In other words, why is the world embroiled in such violence? Who is behind all this suffering? And most importantly, what solutions would relieve the poverty and destruction plaguing the worldwide population?
Enter Chomsky, the controlled opposition, to play the role of re-direct agent. He discusses a mere fraction of the real elite manipulation and then quickly pushes his followers into dead-end solutions and alienating rhetoric. Chomsky's hero status is further amplified by Left gatekeeper publications like Z Magazine, DemocracyNow!, The Progressive, and The Nation.
Is it a coincidence that all of those magazines receive major funding from Globalist front-groups like the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, and MacArthur Foundation? Chomsky may be the head gatekeeper, but he works alongside a network of fellow Globalist assets like Amy Goodman who do their best to appear radical while avoiding all the hardcore issues and deliberately leading the Left into oblivion.
That's the libertarian-populist view. It is a valid critique within a mundane context. There is no doubt that elements within the US government in coordination with certain internationalists elements were complicit in 9-11. Of course, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Committee, and the Trilateral Commission are certainly not "nothing organizations." Also, the Federal Reserve is central to the issue of scientifically and artfully (dark art) manipulating the business cycle of boom and bust. In addition, the CIA definitely contained rogue elements by design. We also know that John F. Kennedy was assassinated by the spider-web network, the global oligarchy, the pinnacle syndicate of racketeers that runs the world, and not by Lee Harvey Oswald acting alone.
It is disappointing to learn that the Central Intelligence Agency filed motions in federal court in May 2005 to block disclosure of records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy forty-one years ago.
In response to the journalist Jefferson Morley's lawsuit brought under the Freedom of Information Act, the CIA is seek-ing [sic] to prevent release of records about a deceased CIA operations officer named George E. Joannides [Joe-uh-NEE-deez].
Joannides's story is clearly of substantial historical interest. CIA records show that the New Orleans chapter of a Cuban exile group that Joannides guided and monitored in Miami had a series of encounters with the accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald three months before Kennedy was murdered. Fifteen years later, Joannides also served as the agency's liaison to the House Select Committee on Assassinations. He did not disclose his role in the events of 1963 to Congress. The public record of the assassination and its confused investigatory aftermath will not be complete without his story.
The spirit of the law is clear. The JFK Records Act of 1992, approved unanimously by Congress, mandated that all assassination-related records be reviewed and disclosed "immediately."
When Morley filed his lawsuit in December 2003, thirteen published JFK authors supported his request for the records in an open letter to The New York Review of Books (www.nybooks.com/articles/16865).
Eighteen months later, the CIA is still stonewalling. The agency now acknowledges that it possesses an undisclosed number of documents related to Joannides's actions and responsibilities in 1963 which it will not release in any form. Thus records related to Kennedy's assassination are still being hidden for reasons of "national security."
As published authors of divergent views on the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, we say the agency's position is spurious and untenable. Its continuing non-compliance with the JFK Records Act does no service to the public. It defies the will of Congress. It obscures the public record on a subject of enduring national interest. It encourages conspiracy mongering. And it undermines public confidence in the intelligence community at a time when collective security requires the opposite.
We insist the CIA observe the spirit of the 1992 JFK Assassination Records Act by immediately releasing all relevant records on the activities of George Joannides and any records at all that include his name or relate in any way to the assassination story—as prescribed by the JFK Records Act. The law and common sense require it.
G. Robert Blakey, former general counsel, House Select Committee on Assassinations
Jefferson Morley, journalist
Scott Armstrong, founder National Security Archive
Vincent Bugliosi, author and former prosecutor
Elias Demetracopoulos, retired journalist
Stephen Dorril, University of Huddersfield
Don DeLillo, author of Libra
Paul Hoch, JFK researcher
David Kaiser, Naval War College
Michael Kurtz, Southeastern Louisiana University, author of Crime of the Century
George Lardner, Jr., journalist
Jim Lesar, Assassination Archives and Research Center
Norman Mailer, author of Oswald's Tale
John McAdams, moderator, alt.assassination.jfk
John Newman, author of Oswald and the CIA
Gerald Posner, author of Case Closed
Oliver Stone, director JFK
Anthony Summers, author of Not in Your Lifetime
Robbyn Swan, author
David Talbot, founding editor, Salon.com
Cyril Wecht, coroner, Allegheny County, PA
Richard Whalen, author of Founding Father
Gordon Winslow, former archivist of Dade County, Florida.
Of course, we know that the CIA was also involved in Bobby Kennedy's assassination. There are also very suspicious details about John F. Kennedy, Jr.'s death and that of Senator Paul Wellstone's death too.
Wellstone's plane went down. The mainstream news immediately blamed the weather and continued to maintain that line of coverage. However, according to James H. Fetzer, who made a much more in-depth investigation than did the supposed professional news investigators of the news conglomerates, the weather where the plane went down was not snowy or rainy or foggy or usually windy or anything that would justify the assertion that weather was to blame for the crash. There were ice crystals in the air at altitude, but apparently no where near enough to indicate an icing problem for the plane. Also, the plane was an extremely sophisticated one, top of the line, with major deicing features built into the wings. The news reporting is, as usual, suspicious to say the least.
The truth is that the situation with news coverage from the mainstream conglomerate news and the governmental agencies is such that they are guilty until shown innocent on any given story. Deliberately misleading stories termed euphemistically "disinformation" is the admitted forte of the psyops warriors of the global, gangster oligarchy after all. Knowing that, how can people in their right minds just take it for granted that the so-called news is as they portray it? If lying is their forte, then everything they say is not to be trusted. Everything has to be independently verified. Who has the resources to do that but the culprits themselves, since that's why they began lying in the first place—to take and hold control over minds and emotional directions—into allowing them their sin?
The important thing is that real Christians know that anything that isn't for radical truth is wrong. The mainstream right now, in 2007, and until the kingdom comes into hearts, is a false-news industry. Its flow is evil. At its core, it is about avoiding exposing the root cause (the true cause, the root cause, being the radical truth, the root cause being evil, being selfishness). The mainstream flow is designed to dupe, to lead into hell. Humanity is constantly undergoing the duping process perpetrated by both duped and witting hirelings and minions from presidents of the United States to peasants wherever. Whole generations of so-called journalists and news investigators and reporters are raised up duped. Many catch on but selfishly won't buck the system. Many know full well and seek out the top (really the bottom) to bow down and worship in hopes of being raised up (really lowered) so they may get their fleeting reward here and now and falsely imagining that they won't suffer accordingly later, whether in the here and now or in the hereafter. Most deny the hereafter even though they pretend in public to profess the spirit of God and Christ, such pretending being more of the duping process.
The satanic spirit owns the mainstream and the coercive government. Whether the trick is termed secular or religious, all blindly bow down to Satan in his house no matter how wide open they imagine their eyes to be. Satan rules the earth, within Satan's context. God rules the real earth. Few there be that find it. Thy kingdom come.
An important point that Jim Fetzer points out, if he is correct on the point, is that the NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board, responsible for investigating civilian plane crashes) is not allowed to even begin treating a crash site as a potential crime scene until the US attorney general's office okays that. Again, assuming Fetzer is correct on that, that is a very bad law. Mundanely, all crashes should not by default be assumed to be accidents, but rather, all investigations should be automatically design to discover either accidental or criminal causes.
Wellstone was killed October 25, 2002, when Ashcroft, his great enemy, was attorney general. Paul Wellstone was a voice in the senate seeking egalitarianism. Ashcroft is a voice seeking a false-Christian police state. Ashcroft and his kind seek to coercively enforce their twisted vision of the biblical code. They don't know how to read. The scriptures are locked up, sealed up, to them. The outpouring from them and to them is evil and not real love.
John F. Kennedy, Jr., was killed July 16, 1999, during the presidential campaign of George W. Bush. Was the crash of John's plane treated as a crime scene or was it deliberately treated as an accident? The Pentagon took over.
Under stand that the percentage of the non-classified national budget spent on the Pentagon went from seven percent under Reagan-Bush to three percent under Clinton-Gore. The weapons people, the war-financing bankers, the false Zionist Israeli Empire builders all hated this. They had mapped out their plan all during the Clinton presidency.
They stole the election. They had already murdered John F. Kennedy, Sr., and Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King and countless others around the world.
John Jr. was, as his uncle Bobby before him, hinting that he was going to reopen the assassination investigations.
So, the Pentagon took over everything about John Jr.'s crash and the attorney general, Ashcroft, controlled the FBI and NTSB in the Wellstone crash.
Ask the Holy Spirit of truth to tell you whether evil has duped the people concerning these things and 9-11 and the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars and the Vietnam War and on and on back to the beginning.
There is also the following about Paul Wellstone:
...the National Transportation Safety Board's own simulations of the plane, the pilots and the weather were unable to bring the plane down.
Among the striking indications that something was wrong with the NTSB in its inquiry into the causes of the crash is that Carol Carmody, a former employee with the CIA, the head of the team, announced the day after that the FBI had found no indications of terrorist involvement. Yet it is the responsibility of the NTSB to ascertain the cause of the crash, which has yet to be determined to this very day.
An abrupt cessation of communication between the plane and the tower took place at about 10:18 a.m., the same time an odd cell phone phenomenon occurred with a driver in the immediate vicinity. This suggests to me the most likely explanation is that one of our new electromagnetic weapons was employed.
"According to Rick Wahlberg, then St. Louis County sheriff, a team of FBI agents was quickly on the crash site about noon, less than an hour after (assistant manager Gary) Ulman and the (fire) chief had first located the site and found a way to access the wreck. This FBI team had come from the distant Twin Cities in record time!"
When Bollyn "asked Ulman if he had notified the FBI about the accident, Ulman said he had not spoken with the bureau at any time. Asked how the FBI got to the site so quickly, Ulman said that he assumed they had come from Duluth. AFP contacted the Duluth office of the FBI and was told that the team of 'recovery' agents had not come from Duluth but had traveled from the FBI office in Minneapolis."
I calculate that this team would have had to have left the Twin Cities at about the same time the Wellstone plane was taking off.
Gary Ulman confirmed to me that the FBI had been on the scene no later than 1 p.m.
I have reviewed the log books maintained by the Sheriff's Department at Eveleth and have discovered that they are grossly incomplete and cannot confirm when the FBI showed up.
The NTSB said it was not the weather and not the plane that caused the crash. They blamed the pilots. However, the pilots were excellent. The NTSB seemed to be smearing the main pilot much as how John F. Kennedy, Jr., was smeared. Also, the plane burned intensive for some seven hours. The fire department couldn't put out the fire. The fire was so hot and last so long that the bodies were burned down. Their bones were apparently burned down.
This brings to mind the molten-metal pools below the Twin Towers and building seven that have never been adequately explained to the people.
Yet, the NTSB only stated that there was a fire after the crash. The NTSB doesn't report on the duration of the fire or that it couldn't be extinguished.
Also, Jim Fetzer says that when Wellstone's plane got off course above the cloud ceiling, there was another plane also south of the airport that reportedly had problems with its GPS and course-deviation indicator (CDI) not matching up while they too were above the cloud ceiling. The GPS-degrade light went on and off and on and off. The pilots and others Fetzer has spoken with have told him that this flight that experienced this problem the morning of Wellstone's crash in the same general area is the only flight they know of where such instrument disagreement has occurred. That's huge. Jim believes that the instruments were remotely controlled by assassins.
Understand here that GPS signals come from satellites controlled by the intelligence community of the United States who hated Wellstone. Also understand that the US military has hi-tech equipment that can jam and manipulate the internal electronics of airplanes and cars and all other electronic devices.
So here you have two different planes in the area in the band south of the airport flying in opposite directions and getting off course at the same time. Remember the supposed mere coincidence of the fuel selectors in the John Jr. and commercial jetliner cases.
Jim reports that the Wellstone planes props were set to idle, meaning flat against the air. Picture a house fan with the blades bent so that as the blades spin no air is forced out from the face of the fan. Well, the plane's blades were set that way. It means that, all things being equal, the plane could only glide at best.
Jim thinks they were forced into a hi-tech kill zone where ultra Pentagon beam weapons (ray guns) could be used on them.
Jim says that a person contacted him to inform him of unique analogue cell-phone disturbances at the time. Was this reported to the NTSB? What did they do about it? Ashcroft, controlled the FBI and NTSB in the Wellstone crash.
Ashcroft, before being named as the attorney general of the US, had lost a bid for a US senate for Missouri to then-Governor Mel Carnahan's widow. Mel Carnahan died in an airplane crash two weeks prior to the November general election in 2000. Carnahan's crash, according to a radar buff informing Fetzer, had anomalous radar signals attached to it. Think about the spider's web of the power elite and their military-industrial complex. Grabbing global imperial power to prevent worldwide universal repentance and the real democracy of everyone freely choosing to be free from evil has been their plan since before the flood, since the beginning of the rebellion against God in heaven by the evil spirits of selfishness.
Therefore, they didn't check anything to rule out crime. Cell phone disturbance and other anomalies were ignored, not treated as leads for investigation. They didn't check with the airport to see if any other electronic disturbances occurred that day. They didn't' create a hotline or website and put out public bulletins on the public's airwaves and over the licensed cables and satellites, call the public to report anomalous electronic or other disturbances.
They didn't check with the customer base of analogue cell phone companies to see if anyone else in the vicinity experienced the same thing at the time? They didn't check to see how rare that type of event is and its known causes.
Also, Jim said, people reported that their "garage doors opened spontaneously that day." Where? What time? Who else? Had it happened before? Has it happened since? We've heard of this before. It does happen. The radio frequency can be duplicated of course. A radio frequency locksmith can open garage doors. It's called cracking and hacking in computer parlance. Is that what was going on? What other sources of such radio waves were present in the area at the time.
The leads are there that beg for investigation and public explanation, not just possible explanations to suggest that serious follow-up is not merited. That's the standard ploy of the naysayers concerning call crime theories.
At the time of crash, the ice ceiling was melted. There was a hole in the ice crystals in the atmosphere. The atmosphere was heated. The Pentagon can do that. The HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is an ionospheric heater as we written about elsewhere herein. That weapon is directional. It can be localized as a beam. It isn't the only ionospheric heater of the Pentagon either.
Jim Fetzer says that the planes fire burned for seven hours without being able to be extinguished, but he says that the firefighters were fighting the fire up close. He suggests that, that indicates that the fire was not hot enough to account for the ice hole in the atmosphere. Well, without more information, his suggestion remains a lead for further investigation. Just how large was the hole. What level of the atmosphere is being discussed.
Citrus farmers used to burn (may still) smudge pots in their orchards to ward off frost. Compare and contrast these things with various experts in atmospherics and weapons, etc.
What kind of heat protection were the firefighters wearing? How hot does the fire department say the fire was? What did they use in attempting to extinguish the fire? When did they arrive on the scene? How long were they actually applying fire suppressants to the fire? What do their fire investigators have to say about it? What known things can account for such burning?
What was the result of a spectral analysis of the remnants of the plane? What chemical elements are present and in what quantities? Is any of the plane still available for testing? Will the family go so far as to obtain subpoenas for materials for forensic testing?
What other crashes have resulted in so much of the plane being reduced to a pile of charcoal? What are the differences and similarities between those crashes?
Jim Fetzer offers ideas for the direction such investigations might head. He does so being very careful to (continued...click the next page number below)...continues... Click next page number below. [If you would like to see the full text on one page (helps with searching for text on the page), use the.] . . . emphasize that he is conjecturing. John Hankey, whom we written about concerning his hypotheses concerning the John Kennedy senior and junior assassinations, does the same to a degree.
Both Hankey and Fetzer argue, and correctly so, that the official governmental reports are deliberately false. Who believes in the magic bullet in the John Kennedy senior assassination for instance. Believing the magic bullet story that is the official explanation of the US government, is moronic and a sign of hypnosis. The government does work at turning the mass of the people into morons. It's what the public relations, psyops, racist-denying false Zionist, neocons, do. They don't hold a monopoly on it though, yet. All the nations of the world are engaged in it. There isn't one so-called nation-state on the planet that is a democracy, not even close. [Update (a little "equal time for opposing, new views"): Happy Thanksgiving & 49th Anniversary of John F. Kennedy's Assassination Via the "Magic Bullet"]
The leaders have nothing but contempt for the people. There is no real love from the rulers. What they love is the power. What they love are their own egos. They esteem themselves so much that they are blinded by their own self-aggrandizement. Humility is lost. They cannot see the error of their ways. They think quickly to cover for themselves, to rationalize all their evil. They make themselves comfortable with their evil. It is the struggle everyone faces. It is all a matter of degree and finally overcoming, finally returning to our true nature if we are told and we are individually from God.
Jim makes clear that he is inferring from the corrupt pattern of behavior of those heading the world into a police state run by the monied interests that it is highly likely that Paul Wellstone, their huge enemy, was murdered by order of the dark princes calling the shots of the Empire. He is inferring from the crash scene and data and the way whole matter was handled by the FBI and NTSB, that Paul Wellstone was murdered, assassinated by the military-industrial complex that is controlled by the top usurers.
Such an investigation would require resources. However, the rich corporations, the mainstream news media, with all its money from advertising from those rich corporations, the government, ruled by the people behind and within those corporations, won't spend resources to shoot themselves in the foot. Why would they want to catch themselves, catch the criminals they themselves have setup?
The Empire consists of a split personality. You see that. The right and left hands are not to know what the other is doing. Secret weapons exist. We all know that. They can be used without it getting out, because those who will use them are owned, brainwashed, and operated by the Machiavellists: Coldhearted killers, extremely secretive, deceptive, and cunning. The master criminals of the world who run the Empire, the global oligarchy, the head of the host of hell on earth, the Behemoth, the Leviathan, the old serpent, the Dragon that will be cast into the Lake of Fire as the result of historicism.
You see where the Pentagons owning the electromagnetic spectrum and weather, etc., is leading. You see where the police state is coming where society will "be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values," as Zbigniew Brzezinski has put it.
Those traditional values are referring to treating human beings as more than mere material owned by those who deserve to rule because they have taken power. That elite is the monied ones, the bankers who own the unwise mouthpieces who call themselves intellectuals. The one who controls the economy the most is Satan incarnate. You'll see.
Also understand that the Pentagon has secret weapons that can alter matter in such a way that that matter becomes material that will burn and cannot be extinguished with current, common fire-fighting techniques. These are beam weapons. They don't roll them out, because they don't want to expose them. If they expose them at the wrong time, the counter weapons will be developed by opposing forces. This is a war of imagination. Whose mental state will ultimately prevail, proving never to have been mere imagination but the ultimate reality? Whose side will you be on? Will you have sided with offense or righteousness?
Let us not forget the plane crash concerning the Franklin pedophile case where the FBI showed up almost instantly and confiscated everything, told the witnesses not to talk about it, shut down the news coverage, and made records disappear all to protect the Roman Catholic Church, the White House, and Republican Party's direct involvement in Project Monarch and The Finders case, etc. The FBI is certainly capable of bringing down a populist senator's plane with the help of the CIA and US military.
Wellstone's plane went down just two weeks before he would have been reelected.
Two years before that, a plane crash took the life of Mel Carnahan, who was running against the infamous John Ashcroft. His plane went down just three weeks before the election.
John F. Kennedy, Jr., also died in a small-engine plane crash. What are the odds of all these strategic people dying in small-engine plane crashes? Where are the brilliant investigators, researchers, and statisticians who will tell us.
We also know that the US election of 2004 contained massive fraud on the part of the Republican establishment.
As for peak oil, it is real but poorly predicted. Technological advancements are being underestimated by the advocates of the peak oil position. That said, global warming is real, dangerous, and human caused.
As for population control, gun control, and the end of national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government under the UN, we must state emphatically that these things are all good when freely, individually chosen and bad when coerced.
Lastly, concerning UNESCO, it has a mixed agenda and mixed results. Its stated purpose overlaps with real Christianity. It does diverge however. It is very much in the false tradition of ecumenism and syncretism, both in the downward direction. Their stated goals and work would appear on the surface to offer the solution to the problems that plague humanity; however, they fall short by virtue of the lack of focus upon the new commandment of Jesus as interpreted in light of the two great commandments, especially the first, namely that God is one in spirit (is the spirit of unselfish oneness) and must be loved with one's all, otherwise, there will be no ultimate success (real and, therefore, eternal fruitfulness that is righteousness, etc.).
Of UNESCO goals, promoting cultural diversity is the one that withholds the truth of Christ the most. "Cultural diversity" is a loaded concept. It must be handled within contextual confines; otherwise, it serves the purposes of greed, violence, and depravity. It serves to silence the truth about cultures down through history that have misled the people. Real Christians must be about the business of promoting the one culture of Christ; otherwise, people are led into darkness without even having the opportunity to turn to the one and only path of righteousness.
As for the objections against UNESCO's attempts to democratize media, real Christianity is about real democracy. We aren't about the tyranny of the majority, because we're about the undivided house where un-Christians don't live. Within real Christianity, the Christian media is common property of the Church, the Church being its members. In that sense only is UNESCO's media-democratization movement correct. The laissez-faire (libertarian) capitalists who take exception to UNESCO's desire to give the media voice to all the grassroots is mistaken.
Now, the libertarians are fond of labeling others as shills; however, when to they turn around to examine the degree to which they are allowing themselves to be shills for the devil?
We understand the morphing nature of the people and their emphases and the shared nature of many groups but that there is a great deal of continuity nevertheless and a great deal of crosspollination via interlocking directorates of the various secret societies down through all of history.
You see, the one-worlders are correct that bloodline nationalism and libertine individualism are both evils of the same cloth; however, coercive means to end either or both is equally evil, counter-productive, and doomed to failure.
In 1950, James Warburg testified to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee the following:
...we shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.
The question is really only whether world government will be a government led by real servants in the Jesus mode or a government led by overlords in the Satanic/Luciferian mode. That's the choice, the choice between truth and falsehood.
Know this truth. The new world order of Satan will come. It will fall. It will be replaced by the real new world order: The new heaven and earth as envisioned by Jesus Christ in his gospel message and led by his spirit.
Consider the following:
Men like Mohammed Atta fit the MO of an undercover CIA drug runner: a man trained at U.S. Air Force bases, fluent in many languages, able to evade INS regulations, working with drug dealers, and receiving wired bank funds from CIA-linked Pakistani intelligence.
What about the unprecedented NORAD stand down on 9-11 which broke standard operation procedure? Over 67 times in 2001, NORAD had dispatched jets when they deviated from their flight path. In 1999, when golfer Payne Stewart's single engine Lear in [sic] depressurized, NORAD planes were flying around the vessel in 20 minutes.
But on 9-11, Ben Sliney, in his first day on the job as hijacking coordinator for the FAA, delayed calls to NORAD. Meanwhile NORAD ran at least 7 hijacking drills that morning like Operation Vigilant Guardian where commercial jets crashed into government buildings in Manhattan, Washington DC, and Virginia. These "mock" drills, designed to give live [sic] on 9-11, helped to distract the honest people within NORAD and the FAA, and to evade suspicion from patriotic investigators within the CIA, FBI, and NSA's Echelon network.
NSA's Echelon network picked up the chatter for weeks before the attacks. In fact, the NSA admitted it, saying that on September 10 agents intercepted calls from hijackers but, *ahem*, did not translate them until after the attacks. Such admissions are red herrings, clearly designed to excuse massive prior knowledge at tops [sic] levels of the intelligence circles.
What about the President Daily Briefing given to Bush in late August which discussed the threat of hijacked jets? What about intelligence groups like Able Danger and FBI agents like Robert Wright who warned of the flight school trainees? What about FBI agent John O'Neill's investigation into Al-Qaeda financing which was quashed by Bush? What about attorney David Schippers who desperately tried to warn Ashcroft about the impending attacks? Why was the CIA admittedly tracking the accused hijackers since 2000? Why was FEMA running drills in Manhattan that morning out of WTC-7? Why did PNAC documents like "Rebuilding America's Defenses" call for helpful Pearl Harbor style attacks?
FBI agent Robert Wright ended up suing the FBI for blocking his investigations into terrorist connections and for failing to tell the people. He came up against the shadow government. He wanted to dig into sources of funding. That effort was blocked by higher-ups at the FBI who are ultimately answerable to the evil head of the global oligarchy. Before 9-11, he was told, "It's just better to let sleeping dogs lie."
These are the same kinds of obstacles put in the way of FBI agent John O'Neill's investigation into Al-Qaeda financing, quashed by Bush-43.
Robert Wright was threatened with retaliation if he pursued following the money. John O'Neill died in 9-11.
...but that FBI attorneys — including Rowley — had agreed there was not enough evidence to do so under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
In the days leading up to Sept. 11, officials have said, U.S. law enforcement put in place a plan to rapidly deport Moussaoui under heavy guard to Paris, where French authorities would take possession of the laptop and use more aggressive statutes there to examine it.
We add that bit of information to show that there are always two sides to every story. However, it seems highly unlikely that a FISA application would have been denied by the court. Regardless, they could have submitted an application to find out one way of the other, and they would have found out what more they would have needed to satisfy the court. This apparently was exactly Rowley's point. There wasn't enough evidence, but the FBI rejected obtaining needed evidence by legal means. It appears to have been a deliberate method to facilitate the cover 9-11-complicity within the intelligence and military community.
Rowley is especially critical of one supervisory special agent (SSA) at headquarters, who was "consistently, almost deliberately, thwarting the Minnesota FBI efforts," according to the letter.
This is a huge game that those at the top play against those at the bottom and in the middle. Those at the top are gangsters who constantly game the system. They make collective trillions off everything they pretend before the masses to be against. They will take turns taking hits for their gang. Much of the game is played on a psychological level for the understood sake of being able to appear not to be part of a clear criminal conspiracy. Many players come up through the ranks from every walk of life and from every point on the false spectrum. They gamble on positions to take. They maneuver. Some are highly adept at this game. It is political intrigue—cloak and dagger.
This deadly game is an element in every governmental agency and at every level to one degree or another. It truly is the war of conscience against consciencelessness. Those at the top are Machiavellian, that is conscienceless. They see pure honesty as a weakness. That's why so many of them are the most polished liars on the planet. Their deeds though always give them away. Never believe what they say about themselves. Only believe what they do. What they do defines them. Jesus said so.
Zacarias Moussaoui's computer contained detailed information on the 9-11 attack plan and software instructions for flying the planes. The agent who blocked the searches was promoted. The agents who had wanted to prevent the attacks of 9-11 were hounded out or killed.
Now, what does that tell you about whether or not to automatically believe anything that comes out of the government?
A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the "Phoenix Memo," David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration's order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the "Bojinka" plot, and John O'Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.)
[lack of capitalization in the original] london: america was itself to blame for the events of september 11 because the us administration was using "kid gloves" in tracking down osama bin laden and "other fanatics linked to saudi arabia", a special bbc investigation has alleged in a damning indictment of the two presidents bush and american foreign policy. the report, which the bbc claimed was based on a secret fbi document, numbered 199i wf213589 and emanating out of the fbi's washington field office, alleged that the cynicism of the american establishment and "connections between the cia and saudi arabia and the bush men and bin ladens" may have been the real cause of the deaths of thousands in the world trade centre attacks. the investigation, which featured in the bbc's leading current affairs programme, newsnight , said the fbi was told to "back off" investigating one of osama bin laden's brothers, abdullah, who was linked to "the saudi-funded world association of muslim youth (wamy), a suspected terrorist organisation," whose accounts have still not frozen by the us treasury despite "being banned by pakistan some weeks ago and india claiming it was linked to an organisation involved in bombing in kashmir". newsnight said there was a long history of "shadowy" american connections with saudi arabia, not least the two presidents bush's "business dealings" with the bin ladens and another more insidious link revealed by the former head of the american visa section in jeddah. the official said he had been concerned about visas issued to large numbers of "unqualified" men "with no family links or any links with america or saudi arabia", only to find out later that it "was not visa fraud" but part of a scheme in which young men "recruited by osama bin laden" were being sent for "terrorist training by the cia" after which they were sent on to afghanistan. in a reiteration of a now well-known claim by one of george w bush's former business partners, the bbc said he made his first million 20 years ago on the back of a company financed by osama's elder brother, salem. but it added the more disturbing assertion that both presidents bush had lucrative stakes along with the bin ladens in carlyle corporation, a small private company which has gone on to become one of america's biggest defence contractors. the bin ladens sold their stake in carlyle soon after september 11, it said. american politicians later told the bbc programme that they rejected the accusation that the establishment had called the dogs of the intelligence agencies off the bin ladens and the royal house of saud because of a strategic interest in saudi arabia, which has the world's biggest oil reserve.
FBI and military intelligence officials in Washington say they were prevented for political reasons from carrying out full investigations into members of the Bin Laden family in the US before the terrorist attacks of September 11.
FBI documents shown on BBC Newsnight last night and obtained by the Guardian show that they had earlier sought to investigate two of Osama bin Laden's relatives in Washington and a Muslim organisation, the World Assembly of Muslim Youth (WAMY), with which they were linked.
The FBI file, marked Secret and coded 199, which means a case involving national security, records that Abdullah bin Laden, who lived in Washington, had originally had a file opened on him "because of his relationship with the World Assembly of Muslim Youth - a suspected terrorist organisation".
WAMY members deny they have been involved with terrorist activities, and WAMY has not been placed on the latest list of terrorist organisations whose assets are being frozen.
But the FBI files were closed in 1996 apparently before any conclusions could be reached on either the Bin Laden brothers or the organisation itself. High-placed intelligence sources in Washington told the Guardian this week: "There were always constraints on investigating the Saudis".
They said the restrictions became worse after the Bush administration took over this year. The intelligence agencies had been told to "back off" from investigations involving other members of the Bin Laden family, the Saudi royals, and possible Saudi links to the acquisition of nuclear weapons by Pakistan.
"There were particular investigations that were effectively killed."
In Britain it [WAMY] has 20 associated organisations, many highly respectable.
But as long as 10 years ago it was named as a discreet channel for public and private Saudi donations to hardline Islamic organisations. One of the recipients of its largesse has been the militant Students Islamic Movement of India, which has lent support to Pakistani-backed terrorists in Kashmir and seeks to set up an Islamic state in India.
We mentioned Sibel Edmonds a number of times. She gave the 9-11 Commission (continued...click the next page number below)...continues... Click next page number below. [If you would like to see the full text on one page (helps with searching for text on the page), use the.] . . . file names, dates, targets, investigators names, all of which was ignored by the Commission. Sibel is the whistleblower who was gagged by John Ashcroft, because she knows of black market nuclear deals where high-up US governmental officials have lined their own pockets. Investigating the network would lead to the top Republicans and others. She also came across evidence that the 9-11 attack was pre-known and covered up by the FBI.
Army Intelligence was aware of two of the terrorist cells more than a year before 9-11.
That does not mean that the FBI was not aware. It does mean that the audit trail would be easier to cover up after the fact, after 9-11.
The legal rationale given later is dubious to say the least. It was designed simply as a ruse to completely break down the people's fear of having the Pentagon police the streets of the country on a fulltime, permanent basis, which is coming.
Shaffer was ordered to stop investigating Atta. The backup documentation was taken away from Shaffer's circle. He was removed from the loop as part of the cover-up. The 9-11 Commission in public ignored this whole area.
Remember, all governmental commissions to date have had as part of their agenda to dig only so far. Even those who would claim to want to open everything completely up really are too bought off, etc., to ever do it from the position of their current spirits.
The government came up with a pretext to lift Shaffer's security clearance as part of the cover-up so that he could no longer do any digging or regain access to the Able Danger documentation for copying and public dissemination if it came to that.
The 9-11 Commission treated the Able Danger program as having never existed. However, even the Pentagon has admitted its staff remembers. This is called the memory hole. It just never happened, because we say so. Anyone who persists in defying us will be ruined and crushed to death if needed. We have the money. We make the rules. Everyone is beholden to us for his or her very survival. We are only getting stronger and more powerful too. Fear us and do what we tell you or else.
However, Jesus said not to fear them since they can only harm the flesh but rather fear the one who if you go down the wide path will have your soul to torture and kill (corrupt and painfully fracture) eternally. Only faith and deeds in the truth of unselfishness that is righteousness will keep one on the narrow way that will lead to deliverance from the evil torture and death of the wide path.
It has been reported that2.5 terabytes of data was destroyed on Able Danger and its findings connecting the dots, as they say. That's huge. The level of detailed information of the network, the cross-referencing, was damning in the mundane. It had to go so that the powers that be could continue leading souls to hell.
This situation with Shaffer was very publicly stated by a Republican congressman, Curt Weldon. Will the seed take root enough?
Remember, that Bush, Rice, Ashcroft, and all the others had been receiving repeated warnings from the CIA. George Tenet was not in the loop to sit back and take it so that the US could then go on the offensive in a big way.
Rice played the dutiful propagandist later when she said, "No one could have imagined them taking a plane, slamming it into the Pentagon." However, the Pentagon had run just such simulations less than a year earlier.
Of course the Pentagon was hit with extraordinarily precise flying which included an extremely fast, very tight, descending turn around the Pentagon, a maneuver that experts said was like handling a fighter jet in a dog fight. This was supposedly done by a pilot who couldn't handle a little single-engine prop training plane and was told by the instructors that he didn't have the aptitude. Was he so good that he could make himself look bad? Then why take lessons? Was someone else piloting that plane whether in the cockpit or via remote computer control through the autopilot system?
The mainstream media is kept from doing in-depth, objective, balanced coverage of the 9-11 Truth Movement. There are many people with a great deal of expertise in intelligence matters who believe, who know, that the US government has done a cover-up concerning 9-11. A good list of such people may be found athttp://www.wanttoknow.info/officialsquestion911commissionreport.
Dick Cheney picked Porter Goss to investigate 9-11 in the Congress. The joint committee though was censored from reporting what the president was told in advance of 9-11 about the impending attack.
A new commission was forced into being by the families of those murdered on 9-11. At first, they picked Henry Kissinger to head the commission. He was to controversial and tied to well-known wrong-doing. Former New Jersey governor Thomas Kean was selected chairman, and Lee Hamilton was chosen as vice-chair.
As chair of the Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran [Iran-Contra scandal], Hamilton chose not to investigate President Ronald Reagan or President George H. W. Bush, stating that he did not think it would be "good for the country" to put the public through another impeachment trial.
The military has given three versions of what happened on 9-11. First they said they didn't scramble any jets until after the Pentagon was hit. Then they changed their story. They said they did scramble jets, but it was the slowness of the FAA that caused them to get there too late. Then the story changed again. They then said that the FAA hadn't notified the military of three of the planes until after they had already hit.
They found steel at the site that was partially evaporated, which requires a temperature of five thousand, one hundred degree Fahrenheit.
The NIST has claimed that any original data about column-steel-assembly firing test done to meet the city building code was missing.
In the testing that was done after 9-11, the test was fraudulent in that they forced excess oxygen into the furnace to increase the burn temperatures. They also doubled the floor load (weight) of the actual Twin Towers. Even still, the floor assemblies held up.
As stated elsewhere, the NIST computer simulations were forced to fit the pancake theory rather than allowed to rule it out. The simulations didn't even still fit the actual event. We explain elsewhere about the holes in the non-impact sides of the towers, which holes did not fit the simulations used to support the pancake theory.
The NIST now does not officially support the pancake theory. It is now stating that main-column failures were the cause.
The FBI distributed a list of eighteen of the nineteen supposed hijacker/terrorists by 10 AM. before flight 93 had even hit the ground. That shows a great deal of rapid skill. If the FBI is so inept, how could it do that? Are they grossly inept only when it's convenient? Many people take it as a sign that the FBI had the list already prepared.
Ali Mohammed was close to Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri of al Qaeda. Ali worked for the CIA, FBI, and US Special Forces. Patrick Fitzgerald, a US attorney, knew all about him and yet failed to take him off the streets. He couldn't, because the CIA and FBI wouldn't let him.
Ali Mohammed was picked up in Canada by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police but was let go when the FBI confirmed his informant status. He then allegedly went to Kenya, took photos of the US Embassy (that was later blown up), and delivered the photos to Osama bin Laden.
Ali Mohammed was all over the place training al Qaeda. He wrote their terrorist manual. This was all known to the US at the time while he was an agent for the CIA, the FBI, and the US Army Green Berets. He taught al Qaeda how to hijack planes.
Patrick Fitzgerald learned that Ali Mohammed knew "every twist and turn of the 9-11 plot." He could not possibly have known without being in on it. However, Ali Mohammed was put into the witness protection system in the US. That, of course, hides him from the public who would investigate him otherwise. Was he a CIA/al Qaeda agent provocateur? The American people are being asked to believe that this person was a US mole in al Qaeda even though the US military airlifted al Qaeda out of Afghanistan.
Investigative reporters have said He trained those who undertook the first World Trade Center (parking garage bombing) attack, the US embassy bombings in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (killing more than 200 Africans and 12 Americans), and the 9-11 attacks. Was he the best false-flag agent that treasonous CIA elements working for the oligarchy could muster?
The idea here, of course, is that the CIA, FBI, and Pentagon, doing the oligarchy's bidding, are evil instruments at their tops. They are used to drum up problems so that others can make money supposedly providing the solutions and also increase their power and control through getting the people to surrender out of fear to such control and disparity of wealth and power.
Pentagon generals cancelled their flights the day before 9-11.
As we wrote above, the Able Danger team was ordered in 2000 by the Pentagon to destroy its evidence and its members were reassigned. Able Danger had identified Atta and three other members of the al Qaeda cell in New York. Able Danger had mapped out all of the cell's network connections in the US. They tried to share the information with the White House, but were gagged. Yet, Atta was the leader on 9-11 in the US who had received a wire transfer, ordered by the Pakistani chief of security, of one hundred thousand US dollars just before 9-11. We are asked to believe that the US government, the White House, was not in a conspiracy. It isn't credible, especially when taken with all the other events and evidence.
Alex Jones digs into the anthrax conspiracy and cover-up with Francis A. Boyle, professor of international law at the University of Illinois-Champaign and author of the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989. As for more proof that the US government has engaged in false-flag operations, we have the anthrax case.
Beginning a week after 9-11, letters with anthrax were mailed to news media and two US senators.
The smoking gun in the hand of the US government consists of two related facts. First, the FBI had the Ames cultural anthrax database purged in an attempt permanently to cover up that the anthrax used in the attack on Congress in October, 2001, came from a super-weaponized strain that was manufactured by the Pentagon (military-industrial complex). Second, according to Francis A. Boyle speaking on Alex's radio show, the same FBI agent on the case was involved in delaying the investigation of the Moussaoui computer (explained below).
The US was pumping out disinformation to try to tie the anthrax strain to Iraq. This aspect concerned the claim of the absence of aluminum in the silica used to weaponize the anthrax.
The FBI also lied to the senators (the targets of the attack and two men responsible for legislating the nation's laws) about the Anthrax saying that the information was "too sensitive" to share with them. The only reason to withhold that information from them and to destroy the database is to cover the criminals.
This attack was the method used to stimulate fear so that the Patriot Act would be rushed through without committee hearings, etc., concerning the loss of civil liberties. Senators and new media were targeted for maximum exposure to drum up fear in the general population. That fear resulted in the population not only acquiescing to the dismantlement of civil-liberties protection but actually clamoring for such dismantlement. This resulted in what the conspirators wanted, greater concentration of power, control, and, of course, ultimately money in their hands.
The same FBI agent, Marion "Spike" Bowman, involved also helped to "sabotaged the FISA warrant for access to Zacarious Moussaoui's computer." Moussaoui's computer contained detailed information on the 9-11 attack plan and software instructions for flying the planes. According to Jim Fetzer, that flight-training software was the same software lost by the copilot of the Paul Wellstone plane that went down. Was it the same licensed copy? The FBI said the very day of the Wellstone crash that there was no terrorist connection. Fetzer rightly points out that such a definitive statement is totally designed to mislead people. Unless the FBI were in on the crash, it could not possibly have known that there was no terrorist connection.
Please note that the FBI had that computer before the 9-11 attacks.
This Spike Bowman received an award and promotion. Another FBI agent, Michael Maltbie, who was involved in thwarting searching Moussaoui's computer also received a promotion. It is ever so.
Also, the FBI agent(s) involved with the famous Phoenix Memo that discussed 9-11 terrorists airplane training were threatened if they discussed publicly what they knew or know.
It is also important to understand that the White House staff and president were on the antibiotic Cipro Â® (ciprofloxacin) on 9-11 and for three weeks before that. Ciprofloxacin is the antibiotic used to counter anthrax.
Also, when the Patriot Act was up for renewal, nerve-agent sensors in the Congress went off. That was to drum up fear again. The timing is not merely coincidental in all of these things. When they are added to all the other false-flag evidence, it is overwhelming. The pattern is undeniable.
Be aware that Halliburton has been constructing secret concentration facilities with thousands of beds, some twelve thousand it has been suggested. It looks on the surface that these are to hold undocumented immigrants. There are most certainly FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) facilities designed to deal with dissenters as if all of them are engaging in violent insurrection. The national emergency would be another false-flag operation on the US at which time the federal government would declare martial law and use the military on US soil to round up all the political enemies, all dissenters, and place them in these camps/facilities where they would be stripped of their citizenship and denied all due process of law. This would put the US on a par with Stalinism and Nazism just shy of exterminating the people in the camps. It should be noted though that the people in the camps could be tried by military tribunals where they would not have the right to hear or see the so-called evidence against them and could be found guilty and sentenced to death for treasonous behavior that is dissenting against the dictatorship.
Remember, law professor John Yoo has written legal opinions for the US administration that were used to sanction torture. Yoo said that the US government, the president, could crush the testicles of children in front of their parents to illicit information. Well, anyone who thinks that is too dangerous to hold any position of authority or be allowed small children or animals. We don't mean that sarcastically but literally.
We've written before about these depraved lawyers who have been chosen by the conservative Republicans to guide the legal decisions and set the boundaries for the federal executive branch.
These are American-fascist lawyers. We mean they are ideologically no better than the Nazis, perhaps worse if that's possible, and it is. The Jews were subhumans to the Nazis, so, therefore, nothing the Nazis did to the Jews was a crime against a human being. They were seen as rodents fit for extermination. This is the status that will be given to those who stand against the coming dictatorship if it is not stopped in the hearts of a universally repentant people.
Francis A. Boyle made the point on Jones' radio show that the anthrax-conspirators attempted to murder Democratic senators Tom Daschle of South Dakota (who was the leader) and Patrick Leahy of Vermont. Five people were murdered by the conspirators. Seventeen others were sickened.
He also reminds us that the Patriot Act was drafted before 9-11 by John Ashcroft's attorney general's office as was Patriot Act II , which has been largely put into so-called law in bits and pieces and via the Military Commissions Act.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)