Thursday, July 06, 2006:

Populism is not a dirty word. In the mainstream US media that is owned and control by huge capitalist corporations dominated by the superrich, populism is used as a pejorative. Anyone who rises expressing that he or she is for the grassroots is termed a populist but is automatically accused of having autocratic leanings as if the two things are inextricable.

The rich are so afraid of losing their own control over the under classes that they will stop at nothing to destroy every populist. Therefore, the worldly powers that be have never allowed the world to see a non-autocratic populist rise and survive. It isn't because there are no people who would start out for the people and remain for the people. They may be rare on account of the political-socialization process that teaches selfishness and foments violent reactions, but they do exist.

Those who come up from the grassroots who truly do have autocratic tendencies are the only ones who are ruthless, as are the rich, to survive the rich even for a while. They aren't real Populists.

A real populist is for the meek while trying to enlighten the thieving elite. A real populist can't become autocratic, because that is the opposite of being for the people. An autocratic populist is an oxymoron.

Jesus was a real populist. More correctly, a real Christian is a real populist. They are synonymous. Real here, of course, is being used in the divine sense of context. In the mundane sense, people will claim to be populists while also claiming to be atheists. They just don't get it. They don't understand the nature of God and the people as being inextricable in truth.

Therefore, be on the lookout for those calling themselves men or women of or for the people who are wolves in sheep's clothing, but don't fail to recognize the good shepherd when he comes along. You will know him by what he is saying and doing. You will know him by his consistency with the message of Jesus. You will know him by his fruit and not by the results of his enemies against him.

The consequence of Jesus being spiked to the cross was not the fruit of Jesus's teaching and doing. It was the fruit of the hearts of his enemies, those who hated him.

When the populist leads the people, when the people are following and leading themselves therefore, and the pack of ravening wolves comes to devour the people, it is not because the good shepherd has led them astray into temptation corrupting their hearts. To think that is to fall for the trick of the devils. No, it remains the evil fruit of the devouring spirit.

This is separating truth from falsehood.

When in truth will the people be able to lead and follow in righteousness unmolested by the devouring spirit? When enough people will not fall prey to bitterness. Then the scales will suddenly tilt the other way. The spiritually blind liars, who are the self-authorized privileged elite, will no longer be able to deceive the people.

The real populist is the servant of the people. The real populist is not coercive. His humility is not vanity. God knows his heart. Those of God know his heart.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Sup1 No Such Thing Conservative-Republican Christian. Bookmark the permalink.