Not Part of the Text

Wednesday, September 13, 2006:

Evil spirits, frequencies (vibrations), energies, have been aimed at us since before we can remember. Today, there are people who have the highly developed, surreptitious power, and have the capacity and inclination, to aim these things at us in unprecedented ways. Mundane, temporal, atheistic creatures can and do aim at others, unbeknownst to those others, energy beams that carry the most evil intentions of altering people's feelings, thoughts, and yes, words and deeds. These creatures will toy with others, experiment with others without the prior informed consent of those others, sending the entire spectrum of frequencies and carry messages (also forms of frequencies) from light to dark.

Of what may anyone be assured. They make of themselves gods. Notice I did not say "God" but rather "gods."

Why has this power been given into their particular hands and from what source?

This power is an extension of the spiritual battle raging between light and dark since, again, before we can remember.

Human beings are simply manifesting what they have conceived in their imaginations, what they have picked up from the implications of their own circumstances, what has been and is going on at unseen levels. They are seen but not seen.

This is an infernal, Hadean situation.

There are higher powers though. The creatures who will use their new found powers will not be able to act with seeming impunity indefinitely. It is seeming only to those who don't realize that already those creatures are being completely controlled.

The highest power has ordained that absent repentance, absent turning to righteousness, each being will suffer its own standard. The right path does not lead to evil, but the path out of the land of the consequences of past evils can be longsuffering.

The brutality of the caste system can result in Jesus or Mao. Do you react with torture and killing as did Mao and Stalin and Hitler and Suharto, from so-called left to right, brutal and wrath-filled dictatorship? Do no harm, or do only harm.

Obviators of evil

Stop the coercive hierarchy. The rightful leaders and those who lead unto righteousness. Righteousness seeks no harm. Don't return to the traditions of man (human kind), because those traditions obfuscate the new commandment and what it summarizes. Let us be the obviators of evil, those who see the obvious causality and avert its dominance. This is what Christ did. He did it not by traditional means at all. He was a heretic on both ends of the spectrum of falsehood.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Sup4 No Such Thing Conservative-Republican Christian. Bookmark the permalink.