Not Part of the Text

Tuesday, January 02, 2007

The following are the typical positions of those who call themselves Fundamentalists:

Being born again

Biblical inerrancy

Bodily resurrection of Christ

Bodily resurrection of the just

Creation: Literally six, twenty-four hour days

Flesh does not mundanely evolve creating new species


Divinity of Jesus

Historicity (authenticity) of Biblical miracles

Jesus is Yahveh

One baptism for the remission of sin

Second coming of Christ

Sinless life of Jesus


Sola fide : Faith alone (no works)

Sola gratia : Grace alone

Sola scriptura : Scripture alone

Soli Deo Gloria : Glory to God alone

Solus Christus : Salvation only through Christ

Substitutionary atonement of Christ

Trinity: Father, Son, and the third person (personality) that is the Holy Spirit as co-equals and one at the same time

Virgin birth of Christ

What do we say?

On being born again:

People, souls, will be born again into spirit infused flesh.

On Biblical inerrancy:

The Bible brings out the truth that the prophets argued over the true nature of God and gods and what is best and right to believe and to do.

On the bodily resurrection of Christ:

The very flesh of Christ was resurrected.

On the bodily resurrection of the just:

The flesh of the just will be resurrected and made whole (eternally incorruptible) by virtue of their soft heartedness.

On the creation: Literally six, twenty-four hour days:

The notion of six, twenty-four hour days of creation is a failure to think contextually.

On the flesh not mundanely evolving creating new species:

This is error. The flesh mutates mundanely. Sufficient mutation will result in speciation.

On dispensationalism:

There have been, and continue to be, pre-historical and historical ages. There is historicism that is to say, God's plan is unfolding in history and will be fulfilled despite, and on account of, the rebellious and the naysayers and for the sake's of the repentant, atoning, faithful.

On the divinity of Jesus:

Jesus was, and is, divine. This is understood semantically, contextually.

On the historicity (authenticity) of Biblical miracles:

Miraculous things did happen and will happen yet. Some things described in The Bible are better understood as a combination of literal and figurative descriptions. Where the exact line is drawn and the exact degree to which events lean to the mundanely understood literal versus figurative, are things we will have to wait to find out.

On Jesus is Yahveh:

Jesus has a God who is our Father with whom Jesus is one in spirit. He is his, our, Father in as much as he does what our Father does. The same goes for all of us.

On one baptism for the remission of sin:

Jesus said we will be baptized with the purging baptism of fire (metaphorical but exactly apt).

On the second coming of Christ:

The Son of man will return in all his glory, which is the glory of God the Father—all credit always going to God the Father.

That Son of man is the spiritual Jesus Christ.

On the sinless life of Jesus:

Jesus said only one is good who is God the Father in heaven. Jesus never said he, Jesus, never committed an error, an offense. His humility would preclude it. This is not to say he did commit error.

If we call him good, we must mean he is one with God and sinless.

We know of no sin of Jesus.

Did he fall to earth? No. He was sent to save the lost and fallen, to save the world from sin that is error.

On the Solas:

Sola fide: Faith alone (no works):

It takes faith and works. The real faith and real words are inseparable.

Sola gratia: Grace alone:

Grace and faith and real deeds all go hand in hand. God would never turn his back on the faithful servant, child, friend bringing forth righteousness out of his or her heart.

Sola scriptura: Scripture alone:

Scripture and the Holy Spirit are both necessary. The Holy Spirit is the word. Scripture documents the unfolding.

Soli Deo Gloria: Glory to God alone:

It is true that all glory is God's. Jesus gave all credit to God the Father, the Holy Spirit. All the glory given to Jesus passes to God the Father. That's as Jesus would have it and rightly so.

Solus Christus: Salvation only through Christ:

Jesus was sent to show us the strait gate and narrow way to God. No one else was sent as the Messiah, that exact messenger foretold in the prophets. Jesus's teachings and example together are the one and only way.

On the substitutionary atonement of Christ:

Jesus definitely atoned for us. However, that does not remove our obligation to be Christlike, and Christ is Godlike so much so as to be one in spirit with God the Father who himself is spirit, the Holy Spirit.

On the Trinity: Father, Son, and the third person (personality) that is the Holy Spirit as co-equals and one at the same time:

The Holy Spirit is God the Father. The Father is spirit, as Jesus said. The Father is one. The Father and the Holy Spirit are one and the same. Jesus is the son of the Holy Spirit. Jesus lives in the Holy Spirit and the Holy Spirit lives in Jesus.

Jesus calls everyone to join that oneness of spirit, that wholesomeness, eternal incorruptibility.

On the virgin birth of Christ:

All things are possible with God. God certainly could impregnate Mary with the male genetic line of David and without the aid of any human intermediary.

Whom do you trust, or do you reserve judgment on this issue?

Is it a necessary article of faith to believe in the virgin birth of Jesus? Let the Holy Spirit be your guide.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Sup7 No Such Thing Conservative-Republican Christian. Bookmark the permalink.