Monday, January 08, 2007

Total information awareness, total recall,[340] total control of the electromagnetic spectrum, total control of the building blocks of life forms and other forms: Creation—our God has all of these powers now and will retain them. Where do human beings fit in?

Fusion torches

They are working on developing fusion torches that use nuclear fusion to separate anything into its base elements. This would be the power to isolate all the elements on the periodic table from any existing structure. Given enough power, an entire planet could be deconstructed into pure elements to be used in constructing whatever they want.

They are working on ways of slowing light without degrading it. They've already made strides in that regard. They have caused momentary delays in the speed of light without changing the front to back arrangement of the photons other then their distance from each. Once the light is through the slowing medium, the light resumes its wave length and speed without losing what it was carrying such as an image for a sensor to pick up just as our eyes are sensors picking up the reflected light coming at us at all the varying speeds of the visible rainbow. They call it "slow light."

Now they have stopped light and then made it resume.

The first things that they think about in terms of applications are weapons, barriers, and secrets. They don't think solely about how to take care of every human being on the planet while doing absolutely no harm.

The Pentagon has vowed to obtain these powers to use as weapons and to control peoples. Who will stop or control the Pentagon? If the Pentagon is stopped, what will rise in its place?

Other nations and entities are well aware of this and are themselves pursuing the same powers. It is a constant race.

Overpopulation and useless eaters

The avenue for total mundane control (that is control that is always under the ability of the higher unseen power, God, to likewise control) is there. The question is not whether or not but what spirit, by what means.

Currently, the greedy, violent, and sexually depraved (the self-centered) are, from a mundane perspective, out front in the scramble for control. They view humanity only in dark spiritual terms or in purely material terms (matter only). This hodgepodge under the tent of selfishness is in the process of evolving rapidly. They are engaged in survival of the fittest in the purely materialistic sense.

Viewing humanity as merely an outgrowth of a Godless creation or viewing it from the view that humanity must overthrow a malign god that dominates unworthy fellow humans allows subscribers to justify in their eyes treating human beings as just so much matter of no value other than to humans who have seized control.

Those who control see growing population for the strain it is on the planet. They don't see the remedy as being one of simply informing the people of the dire consequences of unbridled lust, appetites, and selfishness. After all, a call against selfishness when applied consistently actually ends up without the very form of control the controllers have created for themselves. Therefore, rather than doing the right thing, the controllers will resort to other means to deal with the un-welcomed population: Namely war, starvation, and pestilence. These un-welcomed souls are seen as inherently inferior and a useless drain on the limited resources and feeding capacity of the planet. They are called "useless eaters."

They are "useless," because they are not traders for obscene profits at the expense of others. They are "useless," because they refuse to be stealthy gangsters. They are "useless," because they don't put forward what is useful to the domination of the self-authorized, self-appointed thieves of the inheritance of all.

The truth though is that God is watching all of this unfold. God knew it would, on account of the truly free choice between good and evil and the perfect point of humanity being created exactly on the line between the choices to offer souls the clear opportunity to choose the freedom of good over the enslavement of evil.

What do you believe? Where do you put your faith and trust?

It is not a question whether one-world government. It is a question of which spirit.

The atheist don't understand.

Anyone who believes this story is indeed lost because to believe that a god would send his only son to help us, only to see his son get tortured and murdered, and then instead of unleashing all his wrath, simply absolve us from all crimes past and present, is pure madness to say the least.[341]

This is no reading of the Gospel. This is just a call to libertinism. It is just a cover for one's own evil. It misses the point entirely on purpose to lead others astray. It skips the golden rule and that rules inextricability with mercy and forgiveness. It fails the call to all souls, including the highest of the oligarchy, to practice the new commandment as the only saving path.

The whole thing is about which conscience, which consciousness, which reality is right.

Technology, per se, is not evil. The issue is harm. The issue is care. The issue is getting every human soul to value each other human soul as if there is no other. The issue is the spirit of each human being and of the entire human race.

Nuclear energy is not inherently evil. The Sun is nuclear. Stars do change, and one can call some changes harmful, but are they if those changes lean in the direction of eliminating what is the real harm that is selfishness. Is a star's destructive power unleashed as a direct consequence of evil competition? Consider it.

The state of nuclear energy is only as righteous as the minds it represents. The state of the environment is representative and symbolic of the spirits impacting upon it.

Which spirit?

It all comes down to which spirit will control.

The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. — Zbigniew Brzezinski[342]

Focus on the words, "unrestrained by traditional values." The only reason for such human-on-human continuous surveillance is coercion, which is offense. The spirit for continuous surveillance for coercion is Satan. It comes out of the so-called intellectual elite and world bankers as identified by Brzezinski's Trilateral Commission partner, David Rockefeller, June 1991 at the meeting of the Bilderberg Group.

God sees all, but wants people freely to choose righteousness, to wake up from the spell of Satan, to all be trustworthy together.

Things are going way beyond what Brzezinski saw coming. Mind control is accelerating at an exponential rate. It is accelerating at the same rate as software, hardware, and science.

The mad scientist have created Manchurian-candidate assassins who cannot remember their deeds. The mad scientist are working on using matter altering and forming frequency transmitters to gain total control of humanity. That would effectively kill freedom of choice. Whatever the controller wanted done, the entire population would robotically do it without choice.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Sup7 No Such Thing Conservative-Republican Christian. Bookmark the permalink.