The case of Gorrado Guerzoni and Aldo Moro and Aldo's wife is a peak at the oligarchy that is always right in front of all of us but that manipulates perceptions so that it is not viewed as the Biblical Beast but rather as the savior.
In June and July of 1982, the wife of Aldo Moro testified in open court that her husband's murder came about as a result of serious threats against his life, made by what she called "a high ranking United States political figure." Mrs. Eleanora Moro repeated the precise phrase reportedly used by Kissinger in the sworn testimony of Guerzoni: "Either you stop your political line or you will pay dearly for it." Recalled by the judge, Guerzoni was asked if he could identify the person Mrs. Moro was talking about. Guerzoni replied that it was indeed Henry Kissinger as he had previously intimated.
Moro's widow later recounted his meeting with US President Nixon's advisor, Henry Kissinger, and an unidentified American intelligence official, who warned him to pursue the strategy of bringing the Communist Party into his cabinet, telling him "You must abandon your policy of bringing all the political forces in your country into direct collaboration...or you will pay dearly for it." Moro was allegedly so shaken by the threat that he became ill and threatened to quit politics.
That's a gangster's threat. It was nothing unusual for Kissinger.
Bhutto...paid with his life. We will make a horrible example of you", Kissenger [sic: Kissinger] warned Bhutto as witnessed by the bystander late Munir Ahmed Khan, Chairman of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission.
Aldo Moro was the prime minister of Italy who was working to find the middle ground in Italy, to defuse tensions, to be a peacemaker and uniter to a degree. He was working to form a very big-tent coalition and cabinet that included the Communists and Christian Democrats in Italy under what was termed the Historic Compromise.
The Christian Democrats were moving away from authoritarianism and so were the Communists who became known as Eurocommunists. Both were moving in the direction of real democracy. Of course, evil power couldn't accept that. Carried out to its logically conclusion, it would destroy evil.
Aldo was assassinated, murdered, for it. It was a pivotal point in history designed to set back the movement to the giving and sharing society envisioned and foretold by Jesus Christ.
Aldo Moro was kidnapped and executed by a group calling itself the Red Brigades that had been itself manipulated by the CIA, NATO, and others. The evil power pulled the strings, put out the word, to manipulate the brainwashed, extreme, militant Communist to killed Moro. It has ever been so.
Henry Kissinger hated Moro. Kissinger had been raised up by the oligarchs to be a high-level manager, to make things happen that the evil power wanted to see, to do its bidding. He did. He selfishly satisfied some of the lust in his members by doing so. He didn't bother himself with the lives of the people he helped ruin and end in brutal, tortuous endings.
Is he ignorant? He is ignorant of God. He is possessed by evil and hasn't awakened yet despite people screaming at him. Will he ever wake up? It isn't for us to say. It isn't our place. We want him to wake up. Other powers, evil power, doesn't.
What will tip the balance of the collective conscience of the host of the real and new heaven?
Bent upon creating a one-world government under the richest of the superrich, the global, gangster oligarchy controlled the purse strings so that the CIA and NATO would conduct what is termed a "strategy of tension." The oligarchy's CIA prevented egalitarianism at every turn. Egalitarianism is the greatest enemy of the richest of the superrich. Egalitarianism would mean that the richest would have to be Christlike. Since the richest is the exact opposite of Christ, the richest kill or subvert and twist egalitarianism wherever and whenever it begins to make sufficient noticeable progress.
That strategy of course harms every human being on the planet. Real egalitarianism is the saving grace. Salvation of the soul lies in the sentiment that is egalitarianism. The Biblical enemy is the enemy of egalitarianism. The enemy referred to by Jesus in the Gospel's, Satan, is the enemy of egalitarianism.
Satan is the richest person on the planet. We mean the one at any given moment whose money is positioned such that that person exacts the greatest control over the affairs of human kind. That person is hidden but will be revealed.
More and more is coming out in very public ways. The Holy Spirit is seeing to it and will continue.
The strategy of tension (Italian: strategia della tensione) is a way to control and manipulate public opinion using fear, propaganda, disinformation, psychological warfare, agents provocateurs, false flag terrorism actions and even terroristic actions.
The term was coined in Italy during the trials that followed the 1970s and 1980s terror attacks and murders committed by neofascist terrorists (such as Ordine Nuovo, Avanguardia Nazionale or Fronte Nazionale). The terrorists were backed by intelligence agencies, the P2 masonic lodge and Gladio, and allegedly a NATO secret "stay-behind" army set up to perform guerilla and resistance activities should Italy be successfully invaded by the Soviet bloc (there were equivalent armies in most Western states). Largely unmonitored by civilian agencies, Gladio began to pursue its own right wing, anti-communist agenda using violent means, which included false flag terrorist attacks.
That means the US supported terrorism. It means the US government (not all the people) was, and is, hypocritical.
The excuse of the ignorance of the general population for backing the demonic powers is rapidly disappearing and those powers know it. That is why they are having the Pentagon which they control work on war games and techniques and technologies to "fight the net." They know that the truth will shut them down, that the people won't fall into Satan's line going into the gates of hell if the truth keeps coming out on the Internet. It's why they are beginning to kill net neutrality. They seek to gain total control over what information circulates.
The story of the testimony linking Kissinger (and the CIA) was suppressed in the US. That was and is the standard ploy of he news media. When we wrote during the Iranian hostage crisis (November 4, 1979-January 20, 1981) that the CIA had trained SAVAK (the Iranian secret police) in torture methods [and assassinations], the Arizona Republic edited out (censored) CIA and torture from its print, even though their fact checking would bear it out.
What the powers that be are ignoring is that the people's thoughts for real freedom, not wrath, will cause God to intervene—real freedom being the call for unselfishness. God will make creation respond to the hearts that want to be free from harmful and offensive selves. Creation will transform so that iniquity will be pruned away, cut up, and burned up beyond mere disintegration but beyond reconstruction. The hearts of souls will no longer fall into the ignorance that is iniquity. Love will abound.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)