Katharine Houreld's Associated Press article, "2 U.S. Bishops Consecrated in Kenya," (below in-full) demonstrates mainstream acquiescence to euphemizing the language, thereby, obfuscating homosexual and other behavior that places bodies, minds, and souls in grave danger.

We write the following in the spirit of warning people not to fall but to stop and turn. It is practicing the Golden Rule, as we would wish to be warned away from evil error. Please read it in that light.

Where's the line of these false-liberals? If homosexuality is all right, what about three-somes (Ménage a Trios)? Is that all right? What about pederasty and pedophilia? Surely if two men can engage in sexual intercourse then a man and a boy can too. Is incest all right? Why doesn't society just say now that it is fine and healthy for whole families to openly engage each other in sexual intercourse? Well, there's the issue of birth defects that result.

Well, there's always so-called safe sex. If generation after generation just uses condoms, what's the harm? If it feels good, do it. But don't pederasty and pedophilia turn the stomachs of children who haven't been twisted over time by predation? Yes they do, because pederasty and pedophilia are naturally disgusting.

Is adultery acceptable? Is bestiality condoned? What about sadomasochism? That must be all right too.

Why then did Jesus tell the adulteress to go and sin no more, since she wasn't sinning, according to these false-liberals? Is it that the line has just been moved as much as can be tolerated in small, evil bits? As soon as the people are used to open homosexual displays, then the people will be asked to digest some further depravation. No?

Oh yes. There is an age-old agenda being put out there now to be accepted or rejected. Either Sodom was fine or it was full of sexual perversion constituting an unacceptable and intolerable disease state. Which do you think was the case?

We say the so-called homosexual revolution is the slippery slope to the utter degradation that is hell. We say they don't intend on stopping their libertine drive at just getting the people to accept and condone homosexual depravity. We say they plan to continue bringing in more and more putrefaction from hell until the gates of hell are shut and locked for good—literally for good, which is for righteousness' sake.

How can we handle these questions without sarcasm and irony, which are not of the spirit that is most conducive to encouraging people to turn away from harm (iniquity) no matter how much others attempt to sugarcoat it (wolves in sheep's clothing; the devil outwardly appearing as an angel of light but leading only to decay)?

Homosexuality is harmful. It causes and spreads numerous, serious diseases. It is itself a disease, despite the recent change by psychiatrists and psychologists.

There is nothing liberal about it.

This new twist in the meaning of liberal will be stopped and reversed. This conflating of two irreconcilable connotations will not stand. The real liberal {who is giving and sharing and additive (bountiful through God)} is not one and the same as the person who says it is fine to be harmful and unwholesome. That conflation is false. It comes from the dark side. It is evil and must be stopped dead in its spiritually dead tracks.

There was never anything gay about homosexuality. Gay means cheerful and merry but even more. Some homosexuals conjured up the idea of appropriating the word "gay" for its euphemistic, psychological effect. The ploy won't stand the test of time.

If anyone is cheerful and merry, he or she is not necessarily homosexual. That's how it is, whether some homosexuals like it or not.

They chose the term gay, because it was, and still can be, a great word. People loved that word for what it stood for and still really stands for. Now the concept was diminished by a long lapse in language that fully connotes the real meaning of the word gay. What can and should be done? Use the word properly. Use the language properly.

Gay means gay and liberal means liberal. They don't mean homosexual or sinful.

The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. Isaiah 32:5

Righting the language is required. The language reflects the condition of our hearts, minds, and souls.

By KATHARINE HOURELD, Associated Press Writer

More than a century ago, Western missionaries began streaming into Africa looking for souls in need of salvation. Now, conservative American priests say it's their church that needs saving.

On Thursday, two U.S. priests were consecrated as Anglican bishops in Kenya, the latest in a string of priests who are defecting to African congregations because of the American church's liberal stance on gays.

"The West used to send missionaries to Africa and the Third World," said Kenyan Archbishop Benjamin Nzimbi as he consecrated Bill Atwood and William Murdoch. "But now the Third World is sending its missionaries to the West."

Atwood and Murdoch left the Episcopal Church, the U.S. branch of the worldwide Anglican Communion, because it allows the ordination of gay priests. As Kenyan bishops, the men will return to their homes — Atwood to Texas and Murdoch to Massachusetts — to minister to 32 congregations under Nzimbi's jurisdiction.

The issue has heightened significance for Murdoch, whose brother is a gay priest in Massachusetts. After his consecration Thursday, Murdoch said: "My brother and I love each other and we always will .... The difference of opinion we have regarding this issue will not distract us."

The spiritual head of the Anglican Communion, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, had asked African archbishops not to consecrate U.S. priests to help avoid a schism. Nzimbi said there had been no direct communication with Williams over Thursday's ceremony.

Williams has no direct authority to force a compromise because each Anglican province is self-governing.

The Anglican Communion has moved toward the brink of splitting since the Episcopal Church consecrated its first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire, in 2003. Most of the fellowship's 77 million members are based in the developing world, where homosexuality is strongly discouraged and often illegal.

Africa, home to half the world's Anglicans, is dominated by conservative leaders.

"Homosexual practices violate the order of life given by God in Holy Scripture," said Archbishop Drexel Gomez of the West Indies, one of 10 Anglican leaders or their representatives who attended the consecration ceremony at Nairobi's All Saints Cathedral. There are 38 Anglican leaders, or primates, worldwide.

During Thursday's ceremony, Atwood said accepting homosexuality is "a cruel falsehood."

"The very core message of the Christian church is being abandoned," he added.

Rosalind Hackett, professor of religious studies at the University of Tennessee, said the dispute was part of a wider shift in Christianity, with African churches increasingly confident in challenging Western interpretations of theology.

"They feel they have the right and capability to determine the agenda," Hackett told The Associated Press. "The 21st century is Africa's moment."

A split would hit the communion financially because the small but wealthy Episcopal Church, which has 2.4 million members, provides a significant chunk of the fellowship's budget. Next month, Episcopal bishops will discuss demands that they pledge by Sept. 30 not to consecrate another openly gay bishop. If the bishops refuse, the church could lose its full membership in the communion.

Both sides of the argument say the issue goes deeper than simple acceptance of homosexuality. Liberal Anglicans say the Bible's message of tolerance means there should be a place for everyone in church, but conservatives say that is bending the word of God to fit fashion.

Six other U.S. priests have been consecrated as bishops in the Rwandan church and another in Nigeria. One more American priest will be consecrated in Uganda on Sunday, where a radio journalist was suspended on Thursday after he aired an interview with a lesbian guest.

Davis Mac-Iyalla, who heads Nigeria-based Changing Attitudes, an organization of gay Anglicans, said arguments were being used to mask political struggles within the church. African archbishops "are being used by Western conservatives because they want to control the church," he said.

Not all African Anglicans are opposed to homosexuality, Mac-Iyalla added.

"My Scripture has not condemned me," he insisted. "Jesus came and died for everybody."


  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.