Alan Greenspan gives a phony and deliberately misleading definition of Populism.
ALAN GREENSPAN: Well, remember what populist politics is. It's a very special brand of short-term focus, which invariably creates very difficult long-term problems. A goodly part of the book, as you know, is written about how populism has gripped, say, many Latin American countries to their detriment. And the term "populist politics" is essentially another way of saying short term versus longer term. And people who emphasize short-term benefits for long-term costs end up with very little in the way of economic growth and prosperity.
That is not the definition of Populism. He's lying. Populism is for the people, as in government of, by, and for the people. Populism is against consolidation of wealth in the hands of the few greedy ones who pay off dupes to beat down the people who restrain themselves out of their good nature from tearing the rich apart limb from limb. Populists do not have a short-term focus. Jesus was a Populist under God and had an eternal vision. Greenspan is for the overlord system to which Jesus was diametrically opposed. It's one of the reasons they murdered him. Large scale movements to Populism have always been crushed by rabid capitalists long before the benefits of cooperation could show through. The capitalists have done this for the very reason that benefits would show through if cooperation were not violently crushed and economically cutoff from so-called open markets. Alan Greenspan is either ignorant or disingenuous. We say Greenspan is knowingly taking a deliberately hardhearted approach.
He is of the Hobbesian school of thought concerning human nature that the Real Liberal Christian Church rejects. He is saying that, because no nation has been rid of evil that it is inherent in human nature. We are saying that no nation has been completely rid of evil behavior not because it is generally human nature to be evil but because human beings have and are still being lied to (by a tiny, evil minority willing to do any amount of selfish evil for its own twisted sake) that they cannot overcome such behavior.
Greenspan takes the antichrist position against the position of the original Apostles of Christ who demonstrated that people can be of one heart and one soul and give and share everything with each other.
Greenspan went on to say the following:
...the type of globalized economy that I support has taken hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. It's created a standard of living throughout the world, which is unprecedented in history. And to assume that that is something we should be apologizing for, I find, is wholly inappropriate.
Here, Alan makes the fundamental error of not looking at the entire balance sheet. He doesn't see the liabilities. Look at global warming. Look at all the environmental and ecological problems directly caused by careless, capitalist industrialization, including that done under state-capitalism (Marxist Bolshevism). Look at all the torture and oppression under capitalist dictatorships.
Living a non industrial, rural life is not inherent poverty. Living on the land in harmony with the Earth is not inherent poverty. The progress people would have made had they not been subjected to greedy, selfish forces is not allowed to be considered under the capitalist dominated system.
The capitalist system has created more economic wealth in the last seven or eight years around the world. And as I said before, it's had huge effects in the developing world. Hundreds of millions of people have come out of poverty. And as a consequence of this, not on the basis of populist policies, but on the basis of policies which relate to markets, it strikes me that — you know, you can say all of the problems that exist in market economies — and in my book, you will find, I am very much aware of all of them in great detail.
The question you have to answer, however, is what system works better? And I think the evidence going back to the Enlightenment of the early part of the eighteenth century and all of the events that occurred with respect to what's happened to the world since then has demonstrated that this system is the only one that seems to work well. I mean, all forms of socialist structure, which you seem to be implicitly in favor of, have failed.
You see there that Greenspan's running scared that Capitalism is being exposed for the monster that it is. He is denying that communalism has worked exceptionally well for the Mennonites in the U.S. and so much so in Canada that the Canadian government at times felt compelled to disallow the Mennonites the basic right of acquiring more property out of the selfish fear by capitalists that the Mennonite system would out compete the greedy, which it has done and would more so if not constricted by so-called "let do" capitalist hypocrites.
Also, the kibbutzim in Israel fed that nation. The only reason the kibbutzim are on the downswing is due to laws put in place to constrict them for the sake of greedy capitalists who want excess for self rather than to share across-the-board.
...we've had regrettable problems throughout the world every time we've moved in the direction you're implying. The poverty level has gone up, not down.
The poverty level has only gone up where it has, not because of some inherent flaw in giving and sharing but rather because the capitalists have intentionally (with criminal malice aforethought) put the squeeze on from the outside.
Greenspan is a smokescreen artist for the greedy usurers who are basically nothing but huge, lazy, deceptive, con artist, leeches on the backs of the poor and growing lower class.