September 27, 2007 1:35 PM
"It has never made sense to me how the homophobes can claim Biblical support when none really exists. There are seven references in the entire Bible allegedly condemning Homosexuality, none are in the Gospels. Of the seven, five actually refer to temple prostitution, one on the assault and humiliation of protected guests, and one, one only, implies it is against nature (ROMANS 1:27). Meanwhile, there are hundreds and hundreds of references to love, kindness, and charity especially to the poor and excluded members of society.
But I suppose it is the same with fundamentalists of any stripe, apply your own literal meaning to selected passages to help your particular social agenda. It is indeed disappointing that Christians are so consistently failing to control their fundamentalists. But the seems to be a problem with a number of religions today doesn't it?"
I don't think your interpretation of those passages is the most reasonable one but in any case use some common sense. How could a religion condemn sex outside marriage and then support homosexual acts?

Source: Guardian Unlimited | Comment is free | US bishops have bent the knee to the will of the bully

Many sins are not enumerated in the Gospels. The Gospels are not an all-inclusive, mundane list of sin. The Gospels are a condemnation of all sins, however, by clear and plain implication. Anything harmful is sinful. Do no harm. Be harmless as doves. Homosexuality is not harmless, far from it. It causes and spreads many diseases, many of which are ultimately fatal. It is also fatal to the soul.

There are hundreds of references to love, kindness, and charity in the Bible. Jesus also though pronounces woe on people. He also hated people. He hated his family. He told those who would follow him that they had to hate themselves as well. There is every bit as much hate in the Gospels as there is love. The reason is that that hate and that love are the same thing. You cannot truly love without hating iniquity and those who do it. They are their fruit; yet, they can change if they will be called and chosen.

Jesus was adamantly opposed to all selfish lusting. He was completely in favor of the bonding of one flesh. He abhorred adultery and pedophilia and fornication. All homosexuality is fornication or adultery or both. It is a lie to say otherwise. It is lying to others and misleading them into temptation that if they cave into it will do them harm to say that homosexuality is okay. It isn't okay. It's wrong. It's a disease. Everyone must be warned away from engaging in such behavior.

Tell the truth and only the truth. Turn to God. Repent and atone before it becomes too late.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.