The protesters at Columbia University holding up billboards where the most populars slogans were "Go to Hell" and "Evil" there were many billboards with Ahmadinejad portrayed as Hitler. Why were these people so angry against him? Two reasons Israel and Jews. There is absolutely no freedom of speech allowed to criticize the wrong policies of Israeli government and Jews in US and Europe.

Who really deserve to go to hell and is pure evil and close to Hitler? Ahmadinejad or Bush?

  • Ahmadinejad did not invade two sovereign nations and did not killed over million innocent people.
  • Bush did invaded Afghanistan and Iraq causing death and destruction of these countries killing over million innocent people.
  • Ahmadinejad is pursue his nuclear program which according to IAEA is not in violation of NPT is not acceptable.
  • Bush did use phosphorous bombs and cluster bombs in Falluja killing thousands of Iraqi civilians.
  • Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons.
  • US has all the WMD nuclear, chemical, biological which posses real danger to the world.
  • Israel is the only country in Middle East with nuclear weapons which is supported by US which is main cause of that region instability.
  • Ahmadinejad democratically elected President of Iran not acceptable to US because he criticize Israel and US policies of aggression and oppression.
  • Bush who was appointed by the Supreme Court is infact dictator denying US citizens their civil rights.
  • Ahmadinejad is accused of human rights violations.
  • Bush is in violation of Geneva Convention and human rights abuses with secret prisons, holding prisoners without any charges, torture, taping phones.

These are the few points which clearly show that Bush is EVIL, Bush is Hitler, Bush is dictator, Bush must go to HELL.

RLCC Comment: There is no doubt that this person has stated many valid points here. However, the fact that George W. Bush has engaged in evil behavior does not mean that Ahmadinejad is on the narrow way as defined by Jesus Christ. Let's be consistent. All violence is evil, even in so-called self-defense. The ultimate reality of self is being one in spirit with God who does no evil. God is harmless. God is only beneficial. Everything that is harmful is of the other spirit. This is the message of Jesus Christ. Everything that isn't of Jesus's New Commandment and the Golden Rule (the real law) is harmful in the end.

Originally by QB from Qur'an - Bible. on September 26, 2007, 7:19am


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.