To Tazzy and Piggy,

Jesus said, But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. Matthew 5:28. The sin is real. Harry Potter encourages children to commit sins in their hearts. It is a method of conditioning the children to lower their inhibitions against harm to themselves and to others. If you don't see that, you don't understand his meaning. Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch. Matthew 15:14. If you do understand his words, his meaning, and reject him, so much more is the sin.

As for proof that homosexuality is harmful, read our post on the subject, "Homosexuals: What they ignore," Then take care not to deny the truth. Once you see it, if you are given to see it, help us spread what is real.

You call us "stupid religious nutcases." A nut case is someone who is crazy (insane). Insanity is not being able to differentiate between righteousness and evil. Righteousness heals. Evil causes harm (disease). Homosexuality causes and spreads disease. Those who know it and yet countenance homosexuality are in a worse position than insanity alone, are they not.

You are under a misimpression concerning Christianity. Christ didn't come to bring everyone together. He came to divide the sheep and the goats. His flock doesn't include those who choose to remain servants of sin, which is harm, the very harm proven in the post on homosexuality cited above.

Christianity is not about accepting (in the sense you're using the term "accepting") everyone as he or she is. It is about calling sinners to repent. Christian tolerance extends only to not using coercion. Christian tolerance does not mean condoning harmful behavior or tempting children to harm or confusing them about what constitutes deception and temptation to fall.

You are a homosexual. Are you thinking about yourself or the welfare of the children?

Millions of men love Jesus Christ (a man). Millions of those men are heterosexuals. Those men are not saying to any younger person that love of Christ or any brother in Christ is wrong, quite the contrary. Are you given by God to see that?

You wrote the following:

We're not monsters, nor are we disciples of some evil form. We're human - just like you. We just happen to live our lives a little differently.
And for the record, I'm a christian myself. The fact I'm gay makes no difference. I know God loves me just as much as he loves you.

Jesus called them serpents. They were humans. He called them that, because they were exhibiting serpentine qualities of selfishness and indifference to their offspring. Snakes don't nurture.

You don't live your life "a little differently." You are engaging in radically different behavior. Your root and mine are right now completely different. As for God loving you as he loves me, there is not one connotation of the term "love." Jesus loved them, but he let them fall into the ditch. Do you know how to reconcile that? If you don't reconcile it, you won't know Jesus. You won't love him. You'll remain of the other.

Tazzy and Piggy's reply:

Tazzy and Piggy


Thank you for your reply. Much appreciated.

I have indeed read your other post.

Quoting diseases at us. Very good. Unfortunately, also misguided.

I'll correct a few of your (incorrect) assumptions for you.

HHV-8 (thats a form of herpes virus which is implicated in the development of Kaposis Sarcoma - a form of cancerous skin lesions).

As you probably know as well as I do, HHV-8 has NEVER been a gay male disease. It is more commonly found among the elder Mediterranean and African community and is also vertically transmissable from mother to child in the womb. Hardly a gay male only disease.

HIV - Again, as you know. HIV is FAR more prevalent in the straight population. I believe the latest figures indicate somewhere in the region of 50x greater.

Condom use - Once more, I refute your claim relating to condom use. Thanks to the great work that (almost exlusively) lesbian and gay sexual health groups carry out promoting and educating safer sex practises.

If only the same can be said for the straight community - other than their visits to STD clinics, most straight people receive no education on their use whatsoever.

A lesson that could possibly help cut down on the great numbers of teenage pregancies, don't you think?

Gay Bowel Syndrome. Pah! There's actually no such thing! GBS is merely a collective slang in the absence of any (as yet) defined and accepted common medical term for multiple anorectal and colon diseases.

Using diseases as an argument supporting a religious view or outlook is just silly.

Virii and bacteria do not discriminate depending on whether or not you are gay or straight.

We all know that there a VERY few illnesses or diseases that affect only one gender, let alone one sexuality.

As for citing the fact that gay relationships don't last... Erm, how does that differ from the straight population?

We see daily reports on the levels of straight marraige breakups. Mostly as a result of te infidelity of one or both partners. The sanctity of hetersexual marraige seems no more guaranteed than in a gay one. To say otherwise is a complete and utter lie.

Moving on...

How on earth does Harry Potter encourage children to commit sin? He's a fictional character in the midst of a battle against evil. Surely the character is encouraging children to seek out the good side of live and enlightening them to the nastiness of the other?

As for me, I don't lead a radically different lifestyle. My lifestyle, excepting my location and work choices in life, are probably quite similar to yours - I'm a nice, amiable, loving, caring and giving person.

I get up in the mornings, go about my (non-evil) business, then return home to my partner who I love and have chosen to share my life with.

What's so evil about that?

Piggy and Tazzy

Oh I almost forgot...

Who exactly did Jesus call the serpents?

I most certainly do NOT exhibit serpentine qualities of selfishness and indifference.

Perhaps if you knew me a little better, as opposed to just making an assumption, you would come to know this.

Continued in the next post.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.