The phony left against the phony right:
It's about WMD, a war on terrorism, freedom, and spreading democracy—all misleading.
It's about oil. We have been given to understand that there are some 1 million oil wells in Texas. Iraq has only about 2,000. Iraq may have much more oil than has been reported. Some estimates claim the value in today's dollars of the oil under Iraq could go as high as 30 trillion. We don't know the direct cost in dollars for the Iraq War so far. Estimates run from 600 billion to 2 trillion and more. The so-called official governmental expenditures run about 800 billion. What percentage of the Iraqi oil reserves is that? What is the value to the U.S. in denying India and China? What is the value to the U.S. in eventually being able to upset OPEC? What is the value to the U.S. of being able to supply Western Europe despite Russian control of so much natural gas and oil? How much oil does Iran have?
Cheney called Middle Eastern oil "the prize." It is the imperialist's prize, because the U.S. economy runs on oil still and so does its military.
It's about money, banking, hedge funds, and the Military Industrial Complex (Halliburton, et al.). Rabbi Dov Zakheim, a member of PNAC (Project for the New American Century), was the head accountant (Undersecretary of Defense and Comptroller of the Pentagon) under Don Rumsfeld (also a PNAC member) when Rumsfeld announced the day before 9/11 that 2.3 trillion dollars of the Pentagon budget was unaccounted for. That story died by design the next day with the 9/11 false-flag operation.
It's about power, control, empire, Israel, Zionism (the fake version), Neocons, and hundreds and thousands of Israeli spies and saboteurs of real Christianity in the U.S. who go completely un-prosecuted because of Jewish money. It's that simple.
It's about the primarily Jewish (the fake version) pushed, sheer evil preemptive-war doctrine, a euphemism for first-strike, for belligerence, for starting wars, instigation, which is illegal under international law and the law of God.
It's about Scott Ritter who has intelligently reminded the world, "During the Nuremberg tribunal in the aftermath of World War II, the chief American prosecutor, Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson, stated, 'To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.'" ("On the Eve of Destruction" truthdig.com. October 22, 2007).
Is that or is that not the law? It is. It is God's law.
Unfortunately, Scott's knowledge stops well short of understanding. He then goes on to rail about George W. Bush's religion interfering. Scott, it isn't whether or not religion should influence. It is which religion. It is which interpretation, which vision. Scott, your worldview is your vision. It is your religion. Just stating that Bush shouldn't inject his religion is in itself injecting yours. Scott, look to the real Jesus Christ to guide you. You are speaking for peace, but you do it inconsistently. You do it hypocritically, even though you believe yourself to be well-intentioned. Open your eyes all the way and take the blinders off. Separation of God from the state is the problem, not the solution. Checks and balances aren't needed in heaven. Get heaven within you. Advocate that everyone else do so as well. It's the saving grace.
Evangelicalism is right. Only George W. Bush is lying about that which we are to be about evangelizing. Evangelizing the real message of Jesus Christ, being born-again in the real spirit, the Holy Spirit of truth, is the solution. Know the real meanings and be saved and save your brothers and sisters.
Scott turns to Thomas Jefferson as the source of wisdom. Scott, Jefferson was a slave owner who impregnated is slave and then ignored his own offspring, keeping them in slavery. He was a godless, humanist, slaver. He hated Jesus and God, because he couldn't stand the idea of being unselfish and of freeing all his slaves and his sex slave and of no longer being in a position of being a demigod over his own slave children. What are you doing letting that guy lead you anywhere? The memorial to him should be leveled. He does not belong among a pantheon of deities. None of the so-called founding fathers does. Please, wake up to reality. They were selfish men. They did not extend to others what they got others to fight for them to have. They were about their personal, private, special privilege and advantage. They were about being and enhancing their aristocratic positions of their own conjuring. Their spirits are the very reason the U.S. has been and continues to go about doing evil. Take your choice on the false spectrum: Jefferson or Hamilton. Both were dead wrong.
Scott says, "'I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else where I was capable of thinking for myself,' Jefferson wrote in a letter to Francis Hopkinson in 1789. 'Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent.'" Oh Scott, can't you hear the dark side coming out of Jefferson's mouth. He's said he never submitted the whole system of his opinions to Jesus Christ. He, Jefferson, had such an ego that he would not admit that Jesus was smarter than he was. Think about that. Think about how Jefferson rejected the message and exemplary life of Jesus Christ. Do you really want to continue claiming that Jefferson was "one of our nation's greatest founders"? No wonder the country and world is in a mess.
Jefferson is dead. He was spiritually dead when he died in the flesh.
Scott wrote, "God is not on our side, or the side of any single nation or people." Scott, God is on the side of the righteous people regardless of DNA lineage. The righteous are on the side of God. This is the highest reasoning available. Don't be misled and don't mislead. You are claiming to be right then you say God is not on your side. That's saying God is not on the side of what is right. It's saying that there is no God or that God is indifferent. If that's right, there is nothing to stop anyone from having zero conscience about taking whatever he or she wants. The devils are saying yes to that. They love it that you are promoting that. It's the foundation of the neocons. What's wrong with killing all the Arabs and Persians and helping ourselves to everything? If there is no God, why do you care? Where did that capacity for caring come from, random chance? Is it genetically favored by natural selection absent God's favoring morality? Why does it work? Who decided? What determines? Why are there determinants if everything started without any knowledge of the good or the bad? The elements just came together somehow and resulted in what? How did Jesus heal the sick, or do you think the Gospels lie about that?
What kind of language are you speaking? It's just loaded with hypocrisy. If the selection of flesh and one's DNA line is all there is, then kill everyone else on the planet save those you want inbreeding thereafter to repopulate it. Then eugenics is right. It's evil coming from the evil spirit that manifests with us as the tares.
Then Scott invokes Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln and Jefferson were at different times, but they were enemies. Lincoln was a Federalist in the most violent and coercive sense. He considered Blacks (darkies he called them) as inherently inferior and thought the Constitution allowed for slavery. He did was cause death and destruction and the infringement of consciences at the barrel of guns and canons. His memorial too should be leveled. Freeing the slaves was an after thought with him. If he could have preserved (so-called) the union (fake union) while allowing for slavery to continue unabated, he would have jumped at the chance. He too appealed to God in his propaganda. Scott, be consistent. Stop blaspheming.
The phony left gives Scott a huge voice. We don't say don't listen to him at all. We say discern partial truths in what he says and always follow Jesus. Scott needs to stop, turn, and repent of the obvious selfishness in his own heart that has him saying such terrible and wicked things against the God of righteousness, whole truth, real peace, and real love: The saving spirit. God saves the anointed ones, and we love it.
More on what the war is about:
It's about making Israel the regional hegemonic power and then a global superpower. "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm" written in 1996 by neocons Richard Perle (Chairman of the Defense Policy Board and a citizen of Israel), Douglas Feith (Undersecretary of Defense for Policy and a citizen of Israel), and David Wurmser (Middle East Adviser to Dick Cheney) and others for The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS) for Benjamin Netanyahu, the fascist Likud, Prime Minister of Israel at the time and soon to be again, shows all this laid out clearly and plainly. Let this be a warning to them from God who has likewise spoken clearly on this issue. The evil roots are easily traced, as are the evil branches thereafter. It will be rooted out and cut off and burned up.
Why is anyone listening about Iran from the same people who lied about Iraq? They are listening, because they want their share in the Anglo-American-Israeli Empire. They know these people openly state and write that lying is their method. Yet, they go along anyway, because they too are liars. Look, anyone who knowingly goes along is part of the deception, even self-deception.
The Empire is England, the U.S., and Israel. It's about lust, evil, and selfishness. It's about devouring versus saving souls. It's about the lied that is the so-called American Dream:
Home ownership (one aspect of the factious American Dream): Get it now on credit. That's what the rich sold to them. Here's the money they said. You pay it back over time. We charge you interest. We own your house as collateral until you've pay off the debt to Satan, the banks. That sounds so good to so many. They aren't listening and thinking. Look what has happened. Look at what those financial lenders, those plutocrats have done and are doing from the top down, from those behind the Federal Reserve down. They get billions of people to work to fork over all their earnings to the lenders who get all the property that was really just being rented in effected.
Who has made out like the bandits that they are? There are some insiders who timed everything so they got out in time and had placed their money in assets that are not going down. When things hit bottom, they'll just start buying up everything a discounted rates only to sell it all off at higher rates again.
In the meantime, none of the lower classes really gain any meaningful equity, since all their assets are tied up and they don't have any insider information to know when to bailout to saddle the other guy with the losses caused on purpose by the insiders.
It is an illegal scheme that has been being played out over and over since before the robber barons (who never went away). Alan Greenspan has been one of their lackeys of late. All Federal Reserve board members are well-compensated lackeys. Greenspan has received his reward.
Therefore, why invest in that system? Invest in its opposite. Invest in bringing forth the fruits of righteousness. Give and receive and receive and give. Trust in God. Heaven and earth conflate. The reward becomes here and now forever. See the light. Join it. Join us.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)