No burden

You've heard the saying, "He's not heavy. He's my brother." What is a brother if he is a burden? Is he the non-Christian, or are you, or are you both? Body parts function for the whole. The hands work also for the mouth and head and vise versa. What constitutes the whole and self is decided by the repository and source of one's being. The body of Christ is the righteous whole. It is understood by his words and deeds. He is one with the body of God. His way is the only right way.


Enter into each other's labor. It means, among other things, to be ever-mindful. It is true that it is not right to starve the righteous flock to feed the selfish. It is also true that even the selfish live from the provisioning that begins from God. Anyone who is true to this knowledge will be a Good Samaritan (individually and collectively at the same time) and will thereby be in the process of spreading the body of Christ (salvation) and not seek to confine provisioning, possession, or ownership to the direct descendants of Jacob or exclusively to the direct descendants of any flesh father or mother but the first father and first mother. The family is the family in righteousness. That is the message God is sending into the fallen world to save souls.

When the Good Samaritan stopped and rendered aid to the stranger, that one was no stranger. That one was Jesus in one context and so was the Good Samaritan in another, which contexts are simultaneous at all times. The oil, wine, money, and the rest, was both of theirs. It was God's. It belonged to all in God.

Who is God?

Jesus was and is essentially God (parts and whole): The essential (indispensable) spirit and manifestation of delivery. Christ is the deliverer wherever he dwells including within each who is anointed with that spirit and wherever two or more are gathered together in that spirit of saving. Those who do God's will are those who head in the direction of being taken in to become essentially God: Christ, savior, deliverer, as was the Good Samaritan. They are brought to the perfection of which Jesus spoke.

More on ownership

Concrete property versus ideas as property is missing the point on both sides. The right to the property belongs to God as defined by Jesus Christ. The law of property is the New Commandment.

What ideas do you possess and possess you? What owns you or disowns you and what do you own or disown or disavow?

Who fails?

Jesus didn't fail. He was conspired against by those who avoided answering and performing responsibilities; betrayed by a sellout/double agent; taken in the dark; prosecuted by the devil; tried by tyrants in a false-hearted court on trumped up charges supported by perjurers; denied witnesses in his defense who were intentionally intimidated by the court; judged by those blind to justice; imprisoned as a common criminal; sentenced by a deceived mob; tortured; and with malice aforethought, murdered in hot and cold blood by all who colluded, all of whom were the failures and not Jesus.

The communism of the Apostles didn't fail. They were murdered by failures and allowed themselves to be martyred for the eternal cause of truth that is above all flesh and all matter.

Evaders fail

Those who avoid the so-called tough questions, because they fear being exposed as the frauds that they are, are the failures.

You see them and hear them everywhere. You see them come to this site adding their comments, avoiding the questions, and never admitting their specific errors that destroy their entire constructs, never giving specific credit where credit is due, and only continuing looking for splinters in Jesus while they have the beams of Satan.

They are the dead of whom Jesus spoke when he said to let the dead bury their own. They are in your flesh family. It is why Jesus hated his immediate flesh family even while he loved them without equivocation but rather in wholly intelligible terms he explained. It is why the truth splits flesh families into goats and sheep. It divides and does not bring peace to the wicked at heart or to their wicked world.

More on ownership

Of course, Jesus was speaking about much more than the mundane things. Giving drink and food means giving more than the water from Jacob's well or the bread from the local baker. It doesn't exclude those things, but it means those things and more. It means the spiritual, living water and bread that are no less real but rather more real so much so that the water and bread for the flesh body becomes unnecessary for life (real life in that context). It is the greater reality, the higher to the highest, relative to absolute.

Enter into our labor of real love

Help the movement of bringing forth. Give to the Christian Commons Project to further this message and to translate the money out of its evil system. Continue down this column to below the comment section to the section entitled, "The Righteous Appeal to Softening Hearts," and please help with what you are able to give to the cause. Consider tithing or better.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.