The contrived macho men pump themselves up with steroids. Those steroids are powerful substances that influence emotional behavior. The over increase of such steroids in the body causes a whole, negative chain reaction. The body alters in more ways than just increasing muscle mass. It also changes the very structure and function of the brain. In addition to using steroids, many of the same people misuse other chemicals as well. They use inappropriate levels of psychotropic substances that also change the very structure and function of the brain in negative ways. It isn't difficult to run into quick trouble doing this.

The results are both negative and, seemingly at the time, positive. The negatives are ignored and even missed on account of the user's focus on the seeming positives of more muscle and endurance. The negative is that aggressive tendencies are increased as well. Judgment becomes impaired. The very reason for taking the substances is to lessen being a victim of physically mightier and more brutal individuals and to take their place at the top of that heap of mental error. What is termed "roid rage" is a common outcome.

Wrath gets out of control. The innocent become easy targets. The user becomes more and more the psychopath. Others are victims simply because those others are seen as weak and, therefore, worth less, if worth anything at all. Others become the means by which the psychopath grows his ego. Others exist for this purpose.

Might makes right is the error, and the Blackwater mentality falls right into this kind of antichrist spirit.

Their clients (including parts of the U.S. government in a huge, demonic way) have the money to pay (because they are takers) to be protected from all comers. The innocent bystanders become completely expendable, because they don't have the money to be likewise protected. So, along with physical might, money is the other most highly valued aspect.

As one ought readily to see, all things truly Christian are relegated to the bottom in the Blackwater world. Blackwater is a very telling microcosmic view of the evil path. The entire system that is facilitating Blackwater is the macrocosmic evil path. It is the wide path to Hell. Part of that macrocosmic evil spirit is seen historically in the acts of Nazi Germany. It is also seen today in Apartheid Israel.

Darth Vader is the extremely well-known character from the "Star Wars" movies. He went over to the "dark side." He fell to doing the Old Testament crime of Simeon and Levi (Genesis 34:25) only worse. Vader wiped out a whole village to avenge the death of one he loved. Consistent with what Jacob said about the actions of his two sons, Simeon and Levi, Vader stinks.

Killing a whole nation for the crimes of a few: Collective punishment

Yediot's editor Rafi Ginat has tried to restore moral balance. He asks (July 29): "What's wiser: To suffer the slaughter of our best fighters to prevent the slaughter of civilians in rural south Lebanon and be the most moral army in the world, or to erase villages used as Hezbollah terror motels, save the blood of our sons and be considered less moral?"

Adds Ginat, "Europe, the mother of all double standards, describes us anyway as destroyers of cities and murderers of children. ... The righteous who cry over the ruins of a Hezbollah building in Beirut remain silent over the ruins of the Cohen family home in Haifa. From their perspective we are never right; we are always immoral.... I have no problem considering myself less moral if it will save the life of one Golani soldier. For him I am ready to wash the Hezbollah terrorists with fire.... We are in the middle of a war, and this war must be won.... We need to strike hard — and we should be allowed to feel good about it."

"An End To 'Apocalyptic Unity': How Iran became a top Jewish issue. Is it still 1938?" by Larry Cohler-Esses. New York: The Jewish Week. December 11, 2007.

So we see here in the words of Rafi Ginat the stink in the heart of so many of Israel, "instruments of cruelty," which his own father Jacob (Israel himself), removed only by generations, clearly rebukes, and even curses, prophesying against them.

And Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, Ye have troubled me to make me to stink among the inhabitants of the land, among the Canaanites and the Perizzites: and I being few in number, they shall gather themselves together against me, and slay me; and I shall be destroyed, I and my house.

Simeon and Levi are brethren; instruments of cruelty are in their habitations. (Genesis 34:30;49:5).


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.