Christians do not force others to abide by Christianity. Forcing others is antichrist. The secular government is based upon militant enforcement. Jesus only used the power of words to appeal. He simply stated the truth and allowed those who heard it and loved it to sort themselves out from those who heard it and ignored it or hated it or couldn't hold on to it.
The false Christians today seek through the secular government to force others to not have abortions and to not engage in homosexuality. At the same time, many of these false Christians preach against being good stewards of the land, air, and water. They equate sacred environmentalism that is really practicing the Golden Rule with the evil of materialism, which it is not if practiced and viewed correctly. Good stewardship is not anti-Holy Spirit but the exact opposite. Also, many of these false Christians take literalism of the Genesis story too literally, as it were. They subscribe to the New Earth Creationism where the Earth is only some 6,000 years old and that geological evidence to the contrary is a trick of Satan, as if heliocentricity is also a trick and as if the Earth is really flat and as if literally, as opposed to figuratively, the Earth has four corners. They also claim that genetics over time has not led to speciation. Finally, they believe that regardless of any unrighteousness on the part of those who call themselves conservative Zionists, the current political state called Israel is guaranteed by God. ("Onward Christian Soldiers," by Craig Unger. The Huffington Post. December 18, 2007.)
Holding with environmentalism, Old Earth Creationism, and natural genetic speciation does not negate the miracles of Jesus Christ. It isn't an either-or situation. It also doesn't mean that one condones abortion or homosexuality.
Concerning that said Zionism, it is only as good as the people are good. Since the people are being very wicked, that Zionism is a false form of Zionism. It is the twisting of the concept of Zion or peace for evil ends via evil means. No real Christian will endorse it but rather call upon the wicked to repent for their sakes and the sakes of those they injure. They tend to drag down the whole of humanity.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)