I was looking for "Christian capitalists" on the Internet and came across a podcast sermon by I believe Pastor Dave McConnell of Bozeman United Methodist Church in Bozeman, Montana. The sermon is entitled, "Christian Capitalists. Scripture: Deuteronomy 8 & 24, Mark 10 from The Message." About 9 or so minutes into the podcast, he said that when Jesus said, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God (Matthew 19:24), Jesus was not making an anti-rich statement but rather saying that a rich man enters Heaven by God's grace. Well, I stopped there. Here's why.
That's taking it completely out of context. Here's the context:
And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. The young man saith unto him, All these things have I kept from my youth up: what lack I yet? Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me. But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful: for he had great possessions. Then said Jesus unto his disciples, Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
Context is everything. The man didn't turn around to say to Jesus that he wouldn't sell everything but that by God's grace he would enter the kingdom of God. God's grace upon him would have seen him doing exactly what Jesus told him to do. That would have been the sign of the grace of the LORD. There he was obeying the Commandments as he had been given to understand them, but yet he lacked the grace to turn toward becoming perfect, following after perfection, as God is perfect. Jesus said that to be perfect the man must sell everything for the sake of the poor. That's what was required then, and Jesus isn't lowering his standards to suit the temptations of the time. He came to raise the standard forever. Also, Jesus said very clearly, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. It means it's very nearly impossible. How could it happen? Well, if all were rich it would happen. Also, if someone were giving it away as quickly as he could as it came streaming in. Then who could find fault in it, depending upon the means to obtain the wealth.
What it is though is most definitely an anti-rich, anti-hoarding message. Also, there is a fuller context that is the entirety of what Jesus taught that when taken in its entirety, makes very clear that Jesus doesn't like the whole system that is money. He doesn't like money-changing. He doesn't like traditional banking that is lending for return. He doesn't like taxes. All of these things add up to money being unrighteous as he called it.
So, Pastor Dave, as with so many other preachers, mistakenly is being an apologist for capitalism. He's twisting scripture by taking it out of context and reading into it what he wants to hear and see. He's avoiding the implications of the real reading. Consequently, his flock is being misled into doing less than they ought to do, which is giving and sharing all together and with others as one heart and one soul. God bless all preachers with the truth to lead the flock out of serving mammon, which is capitalism.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)