There is a war for your heart, mind, and soul on-going. There is the truth. Then, there is everything else. The "everything else" is loaded with partial-truths. That's the challenge: To separate the falsehood from the truth so purity remains. The bankers are wrong. The racists are wrong. The bankers attempt to throw people off by pointing to the obvious: Many who are anti-banking are racists. However, not all people are racists who are anti-usury, anti-tax, or against private, monopoly control of the U.S. currency or any national or international currency. Furthermore, just because many racists are anti-so-called Federal Reserve (which is not federal and has no independently audited reserves), does not prove that position wrong. The challenge is to brave the blanket insinuation while not falling to racism. Remember that not all Jews are bankers and that not all Jews hold with banking. It's that simple.
The following have not all been verified.
Give me control of a nation's money, and I care not who makes its laws. — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
That quote comes in several forms: "Allow me to control the issue and the nation's money, and I care not who makes its laws." "Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws." ("Conspiracy," Wikiquote. Last accessed: Thursday, January 17, 2008.)
The central bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the Principles and form of our Constitution. I am an Enemy to all banks discounting bills or notes for anything but Coin. If the American People allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the People of all their Property until their Children will wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered. — Thomas Jefferson
If we run into such debts as that we must be taxed in our meat and in our drink, in our necessaries and our comforts, in our labors and our amusements, for our callings and our creeds, as the people of England are, our people, like them, must come to labor sixteen hours in the twenty-four, and give the earnings of fifteen of these to the government for their debts and daily expenses; And the sixteen being insufficient to afford us bread, we must live, as they do now, on oatmeal and potatoes, have no time to think, no means of calling the mismanagers to account; But be glad to obtain subsistence by hiring ourselves to rivet their chains around the necks of our fellow sufferers; And this is the tendency of all human governments. A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for a second, that second for a third, and so on 'til the bulk of society is reduced to mere automatons of misery, to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering...and the forehorse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression. — Thomas Jefferson
The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes. — Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli of England, 1844
The few who understand the system will either be so interested from its profits or so dependant on its favors that there will be no opposition from that class. — Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863
Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and all commerce ... and when you realise that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate. — U.S. President James A. Garfield, a few weeks before he was assassinated on July 2, 1881
Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. — Woodrow Wilson
These 12 corporations together cover the whole country and monopolize and use for private gain every dollar of the public currency. — Mr. Crozier of Cincinnati, before Senate Banking and Currency Committee, 1913
This [Federal Reserve Act] establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President [Wilson] signs this bill, the invisible government of the monetary power will be legalized.... the worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill. — U.S. Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, Sr., 1913
From now on, depressions will be scientifically created. — U.S. Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr., 1913
The Federal Reserve Banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this nation is run by the international bankers. — U.S. Congressman Louis T. McFadden
The Federal Reserve Bank buys government bonds without one penny. — U.S. Congressman Wright Patman, Congressional Record, September 30, 1941
Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States. — U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater
Banks lend by creating credit. They create the means of payment out of nothing. — Ralph M. Hawtrey, Secretary of the British Treasury
Every Congressman, every Senator knows precisely what causes inflation...but can't support the drastic reforms to stop it [Federal Reserve] because it could cost him his job. — Robert A. Heinlein, Expanded Universe
By a continuous process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method, they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some.... The process engages all of the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner that not one man in a million can diagnose. — John Maynard Keynes Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1920
The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson. — U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in a letter dated November 21, 1933 to Colonel E. Mandell House
Regrettably, history is strewn with visions of such 'new eras' that, in the end, have proven to be a mirage. — Alan Greenspan, February 1997
Today's economy was probably experiencing a once-in-a-century acceleration in innovation, but people may well conclude that a good deal of what we are currently experiencing was just one of the many euphoric speculative bubbles that have dotted human history. — Alan Greenspan, January 2000
You see, Alan Greenspan knew all about "euphoric speculative bubbles." Why then did he lend out so much money by so drastically lowering the discount rate? Why also then has he been a champion of laissez faire tempered only by ostensible monetary discipline (monetarism)? Why then was he acting contrary to that very discipline? He created debt and inflation. He created false equity for those who could never repay. How will the debts be repaid and the rich bailed out? It will be via taxes, as always.
Instead of blaming Mr. Greenspan, we should reflect on the willing suspension of disbelief that allowed us to ignore everything we have been taught about sound investing. — Steven Rattner, New York Times, April 4, 2001
This is hogwash, because the lending was extended to those who were never taught about the way the system works via manipulation. It is covered up. To Hell with caveat emptor: Letting the buyer beware even where every warning sign has been painted over and pointed in the wrong direction by greedy, violent, and depraved demons. It's time the corrupt are exposed and that honest, unselfish people lead one another, share with each other, look out for the least, warn everyone, and join the spirit of righteousness.
The common person is too busy working for a living to study history to piece together the facts to discover the truth. They ought to be able to depend upon the good faith of others to tell them what they need to know to avoid such disasters. Unfortunately, good faith toward the poor is the last thing at the top of the worldly world. That's why Jesus is overturning the world and leveling it whether the greedy and self-centered like it or not. The last first and everyone serving everyone without any mundane money anywhere is the condition of the real Heaven, which the Libertarian Capitalists (such Ayn Rand) choose to ignore to the peril of their immortal souls.
Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men's protection and the base of a moral existence. — Francisco d'Anconia's "Money Speech." Excerpt from Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand
That's just sheer antichrist. Ayn Rand stands against Jesus. Are you really going to follow her rather then going with Jesus? How could anyone think Ayn Rand was more enlightened? Gold is the base of a moral existence is absurd. Morality requires no material medium of exchange. What did God ever ask of Ayn Rand in exchange for sunshine? Did she give him gold in exchange or paper backed by a stash of gold? She taught nothing about real value and real wealth.
The makings of booms and busts are well known. Booms and busts are deliberately started at the top of the lending pyramid. They are always a Ponzi scheme. It's exposed. The whole system is one huge Ponzi scheme. The top lenders always transfer the notes to someone else before the collapse. They always have the taxpayers bailout the system. They always work the system so they take the lion's share and devour the most.
The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund. — part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in the New York Times, April 1994
You should see from all of this that it is the system that is money that is the tool of all that is antichrist. Jesus showed that the spirit doesn't require money. The new world order that the bankers are constructing will be replaced by a moneyless order for the anti-selfish world that will come into being.
Definitely don't automatically buy into what is spewed out as news by those who are bought and sold by the top monied interests.
The news and truth are not the same thing. — Walter Lippmann, American journalist, 1889-1974
The owners of the Washington Post long ago acknowledged that the Post is the government's voice to the people. In 1981, Katherine Graham, who owns the Post and Newsweek announced that her editors would 'cooperate with the national security interests. National security in this context means 'CIA'. — John Stockwell, former CIA official
We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years, but the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries. — David Rockefeller, June 1991
Propaganda is not inherently evil. Jesus was a propagandist. Everyone putting forth a position is propagandizing. The issue is what is being forwarded.
National auto-determination, or as it is more commonly known in political terms, self-determination, is not a good thing when nations choose evil. However, coercion itself is evil, and evil can't cure evil.
Are the coercive intellectual elite (such as Zbigniew Brzezinski) hired by or patronized by the world bankers (such as David Rockefeller) together, by virtue of their rise to the top of the worldly world of acquisition, accumulation, hoarding, consolidation, and monopolization, necessarily the fittest for leading the world? Rockefeller says they are "preferable" to national self-determination. No doubt, he is thinking here of the historical errors of so many such nations. The solution though does not lie in building upon one form of predatory spirit over another.
The solution is the absence of the predatory spirit altogether, a la Jesus Christ. Why choose Zbigniew Brzezinski over national self-determination when we can follow Christ? Zbigniew Brzezinski is not the savior. The other intellectual elite and world bankers are not the saviors. Their path is not the narrow way at all.
Conspiracies are also not inherently evil. People can and do conspire to do good. It is the conspiracy to harm that is the problem, obviously.
It is also obvious to those whose thinking doesn't automatically shut down by hypnotic triggers of marketing conditioning that everything that is done behind closed doors and is to remain within the group is conspiratorial by definition. The bankers do meet and plan and execute behind closed doors, and their discussions and records are kept from the public. Are they up to no good?
When one compares their fruits to those advocated by Jesus, it is impossible to conclude that they are planning and executing goodness. They may rationalize, thinking they are, etc., but they are not doing the good work.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)