NEOCON ATTORNEY GENERAL MICHAEL MUKASEY RULE: IF YOU CAN GET A GOVERNMENT LAWYER TO SAY TORTURE'S LEGAL, IT IS

Attorney General Michael Mukasey has said he will not look into illegal waterboarding, because the then attorneys for the neocons in the White House said at the time that it was legal. ("Mukasey says no criminal probe of waterboarding," CNN. February 7th, 2008.) Therefore, if you are in the federal government and the U.S. Attorney General tells you that it is legal for you to cut your children's throats just because you think they might one day displease you, you'll be immune from the U.S. Justice Department investigating you. You're covered even though you knew cutting your children's throats was illegal.

Let's be clear here. No one didn't know that torture was illegal. No CIA agent didn't know that waterboarding was illegal. Everyone in power who is saying anything to the contrary is just flat out lying. What's more, everyone in and out of government who has two brain cells to rub together knows it.

Look, people are responsible to think about what is unethical, immoral, sinful, or legal or illegal before they engage in activity. Soldiers are told to disobey illegal orders.

The problem we have is with hypocrisy. That's what Jesus said, and he was 100% right about it.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers asked Mukasey if he would be investigating. Mukasey said he would not be. Now what?

Before the Democrats regained control of the committees in both houses of Congress, Conyers was yelling often about impeaching the President and Vice President. Now he's doing nothing. He did that so Democrats would be voted in (on those political planks). Now he's saying that it wouldn't go over on Fox News. Who cares whether or not something would or wouldn't go over on Fox News?

Well, as the Church and as Christians, we aren't about judging people to condemn them. We only raise these types of issue so that the discussion about the evil of hypocrisy can be placed front and center in people's daily lives. That's for the sake of eliminating that hypocrisy. It is for the sake of all the good that will transpire once that happens. That's all, and it's everything.

We know that waterboarding happened even though the government had tried to keep it somewhat under wraps. CIA Director Michael Hayden has admitted it happened. They leaked it to reduce people's inhibitions toward it.

Real evil and so-called progress take two steps forward and then only one back. Real evil disguises itself as progress. What passes as Progressivism is often just lowering inhibitions to doing harm. This is why so many people can't understand humanity claiming modernity and civility while so many refuse to shed the snakeskin.

People need to evolve beyond the neocon, neolib, selfish, reptilian brain.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.