Mohammed didn't know Christ.
There's an Iranian filmmaker, Nader Talebzadeh, whose film about Jesus is coming out in Iran. In his film, Jesus is depicted according to Mohammed. ("Story of Jesus Through Iranian Eyes," by Lara Setrakian. ABC News. February 16, 2008.) The Qur'an says Jesus was not the son of God and that he was not crucified. Someone else was crucified in his place.
Nader Talebzadeh said that Jesus was "A beautiful man, a beautiful prophet. Why should he be bloodied that way? ... I have never found one case among practicing Christians who are offended [by the movie]. ... Part of the message of Jesus was censored out [of The Bible], which was the coming of the next prophets. If you listen to what Jesus said, Jesus talked about the Prophet Mohammad, many, many times. And it was eliminated in the Gospels and the Bibles that [made it through] history. In 325, the Council of Nice was out to destroy all the other Gospels. One of those Gospels was the Gospel of Barnabas, which I used in great detail. ... It had a lot of sermons of Jesus that you do not see in the Bible; miracles, and at least a hundred references to the Prophet Mohammad, about his coming. It's one of the biggest censorships of history."
In order for the Qur'an to be right, the four Gospels have to be wrong. Those Gospels predate the Qur'an. Also, if you remove the crucifixion of Jesus and have someone else crucified in his place, there is nothing left. To believe as Mohammed would have you believe is completely to miss the entire point.
The most telling thing Jesus did was willingly go to the cross for the sake of everyone else who would benefit. He set the example of not fighting back but rather being so unselfish as to put everyone with a heart to shame. Of course, that's exactly what didn't sit well with Mohammed.
It is the kind and degree of love Jesus showed that bought the Earth and humanity time. It is that kind and degree of love that if we will all just show, all would be healed forever.
Jesus and God didn't cheat. Jesus went through it. He faced it in full faith. It's why we love him. He did it for us. He went through the pain and suffering for us. It wasn't Judas or anyone else who secretly went through it. It was really Jesus Christ they murdered for their wholly selfish, evil reasons. Even still, he asked God to forgive the mob for their ignorance. People just don't come any better than that. Mohammed certainly doesn't hold a candle to Jesus's light that is brighter than all the stars combined.
Whom are you going to believe? Mohammed was a caravan raider. He attacked caravans, slaughtered people, stole all their goods, and took many into slavery including the women and girls for sex slaves. He divvied up the loot with his followers while he took the largest share. He had two sets of rules. He had the rules for himself and then the rules for everyone else. He always got more: More loot, more women, etc. Can you really trust a person such as that? I don't.
When I compare Jesus and Mohammed, it's as comparing day to night with Jesus the day, the light of truth, and Mohammed the night, the darkness of falsehood.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)