JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - South Africa's leading human rights agency is investigating why white journalists were barred from a briefing with Jacob Zuma, the leader of the ruling African National Congress (ANC), media reported on Monday.
A number of white reporters were asked to leave or refused entry at an event on Friday sponsored by the Forum of Black Journalists (FBJ).
Black, Indian and other non-white journalists were allowed into the briefing, where Zuma was the guest speaker.
South Africa's Talk Radio 702 said it had formally complained to the South African Human Rights Commission after one of its reporters was told to leave the event in a Johannesburg suburb.
The commission is expected to make an announcement later on Monday, the Citizen newspaper reported.
The incident has stirred controversy in South Africa, with many drawing comparisons with the racist policies of the apartheid system, which was dismantled before the 1994 all-race elections.
The FBJ has defended its decision to exclude whites.
Abbey Makoe, the chairman of the FBJ's steering committee, told Talk Radio 702 that black journalists had been disadvantaged and sidelined historically and needed a forum to discuss their issues separately.
RLCC: "...a forum to discuss their issues separately." Is that what the briefing with Jacob Zuma was? The article doesn't make it clear.
Freedom of association is the issue. Can doors be forced open? How are we to react to evil even when that evil is harming the innocent? That's the question presented by Jesus Christ to everyone.
If we all stop doing harm, there won't be such access and reporting issues.
from on February 25, 2008, 1:41am