THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS DOES NOT OWN THE DEFINITION OF WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A CHRISTIAN (EVANGELIST)

George Barna of the Barna Group (which conducts polling of those calling themselves Christian) wrote the following:

[W]e ... drew out seven particular elements that seemed most central to their perspective. Those include the accuracy and reliability of the Bible, the sinless life of Christ, the existence of Satan as an influential spiritual being, the importance of sharing one's faith in Christ with others, that a person cannot earn their way into Heaven, religious faith is very important in the person's life, and that God is the omnipotent and omniscient creator and ruler of the universe. The NAE has more components in their statement, but these seemed pivotal, and would give us a good grip on where a person was coming from, theologically." ("An Interview with George Barna," by Zack. Revolution in Jesusland. Wednesday, February 13, 2008.)

Now, the biggest hurdle for most people is the so-called Protestant Reformation notion that a person cannot earn his or her way into Heaven. That's nonsense. Anyone who does everything Jesus instructed will have earned his or her way into Heaven. Doing everything Jesus instructs includes having the spiritual make-up he taught. That spirit gets into Heaven. In fact, Heaven is that spirit. It dwells within each person of that spirit. It has earned itself. The hang up is semantical and stems from the spirit that doesn't want the requirement of love in action. That would be too unselfish. That would require giving and sharing all as Jesus taught and demonstrated.

Jesus made it perfectly clear that souls are and will be judged on works. He also made perfectly clear that works come directly out of the heart. They come directly from the spirit that resides within.

Jesus called upon people to change their behavior to change their spirit and to change their spirit to change their behavior. You don't get consistently good fruit from a corrupt tree. The works define the tree. What comes forth from the tree determines the spirit of that tree. It is why the fig tree whither and died. It didn't bring forth. It didn't do the good work. It didn't make it into Heaven. It didn't earn it. It earned its way into another place.

Deeds or works and faith and grace are all inextricable. We do the works as we are given by God to do them. God gets the credit. It is God within doing the works. God doesn't close the door upon himself.

  1. Accuracy and reliability of the Bible
  2. Sinless life of Christ
  3. Existence of Satan as an influential spiritual being
  4. Importance of sharing one's faith in Christ with others
  5. A person cannot earn his/her way into Heaven
  6. Religious faith is very important in the person's life
  7. God is the omnipotent and omniscient creator and ruler of the universe

The concept of biblical inerrancy of the self-styled Fundamentalists is unclear. They don't make clear where the line is drawn between the literal and figurative. Nevertheless, they insist they are literalists even though Jesus was not. Jesus taught in both the figurative and the literal. That's fundamental.

We are spirit. The Satanic spirit is manifest in human beings, just as the spirit of God is manifest.

God is wherever goodness is. God is not where goodness is not. That is absolute. Satan is the creator and ruler of the evil world. Satan is the god of the worldly world that is the selfish world. The greedy, the violent, and the depraved worship that Satanic spirit regardless of whether or not they claim to profess God. They don't know God. They confuse Satan with God.

Harmlessness and beneficence are required by the divine law in one's heart.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.