By TOBY MUSE, Associated Press Writer
BOGOTA, Colombia - Venezuela and Ecuador sought Monday to make Colombia pay a high diplomatic and economic price for killing a leftist rebel leader in the Ecuadorean [sic] jungle expelling its diplomats, ordering troops to the border and largely halting trade at key points along the frontier.
But Colombia quickly struck back, revealing what it said were incriminating documents seized from the rebel camp that suggest its neighbors have been secretly supporting the rebels' deadly insurgency.
And in a tit-for-tat move, Venezuela later displayed the laptop of a slain drug trafficker, which it said contained information implicating Colombia's national police chief in the cocaine trade.
Colombia's national police chief said the documents show Venezuela recently paid $300 million to the rebels, among other financial and political ties that date back years, and that high-level meetings have been held between rebels and Ecuadorean [sic] officials.
And this shocker: Colombia says some documents suggest the rebels have bought and sold uranium.
"When they mention negotiations for 50 kilos of uranium this means that the FARC are taking big steps in the world of terrorism to become a global aggressor. We're not talking of domestic guerrilla but transnational terrorism," Gen. Oscar Naranjo said at an explosive news conference.
Naranjo didn't give any details on when, where or from whom the uranium was allegedly [right] bought. He provided no proof of the payment and wouldn't release copies of the documents, which he said are "tremendously revelatory" and are being examined with the help of U.S. experts.
[RLCC: It has a familiar ring to it: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." Maybe Sibel Edmonds could shed some light on the subject if she weren't gagged by the neocons. Let's see, the U.S. has been embarked upon a Worldwide Attack Matrix now for how long? They been rolling out the deception, the covert operations, for years. Who thought up this latest move? You know, the U.S. government pays people to sit around dreaming up ways to create and manage perceptions around the world. You also should know that the major mainstream media, the U.S. corporations, are in it for the money and that anyone and everyone who is in it for the sake of the people and God is an enemy who has to be made to look dangerous, not that there aren't people who are ignorantly moved by the agitators into actually becoming a danger. It's all planned even though there is always a degree of uncertainty. The general direction though is toward whatever will afford the plutocrats greater wealth in mammon and material and more and more evil power and evil control, which as anyone who has been paying attention has come to realize always loses in the end.]
Both Venezuela and Ecuador dismissed his allegations as lies. They expelled Colombia's top diplomats and recalled their own. Ecuador's President Rafael Correa planned to visit five Latin American countries starting Tuesday to defend his decision to break off diplomatic relations, accusing Colombia of being an enemy of peace and lying about the nature of the raid.
Colombia said military commandos, tracking Reyes through an informant [U.S. spy satellites?], were fired upon from Ecuadorean [sic] territory. But Correa said Colombia deliberately carried out the strike beyond its borders, and that the rebels were "bombed and massacred as they slept, using precision technology."
Both countries also began reinforcing their borders, mobilizing troops and tanks as Chavez warned that another Colombian attack could spark a wider South American war [exactly what the U.S. wants so it can pour billions into the fascist regime in Columbia to control the cocaine and to get back control of the oil and gas in the entire hemisphere].
Venezuelan National Guard troops and customs authorities suspended new imports and exports at the busiest border crossings. One Colombian police commander, Col. Ivan Florez, told the AP that all vehicles with Colombian license plates were being turned away from a key border crossing.
Maintaining trade with Colombia, essential to Venezuela's economy ["essential"?], is one of many factors weighing against outright war. But the bellicose rhetoric has worried Latin American leaders. The presidents of Chile, Mexico and Brazil offered to mediate, and an emergency session of the Organization of American States was scheduled for Tuesday in Washington.
U.S. State Department spokesman Tom Casey said the United States supports Colombia's right to defend itself against the leftist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC, and called for dialogue. [Does it work two ways? Do the poor have the same right to defend themselves against ultra-rich, militant, imperialists? We aren't for anyone resorting to violence. That's why we are against the methods of both the U.S. government (which doesn't represent us) and the FARC.]
Colombian officials have long complained that rebels take refuge in Ecuador and Venezuela. But Defense Minister Juan Manuel Santos said Monday that his government isn't moving any troops and "we have the situation under control."
The rebels, who have been fighting for more than four decades for a more equitable distribution of wealth [a sin in the eyes of the rabid capitalists] in Colombia, fund themselves largely through the cocaine trade [The CIA has been behind huge drug trafficking into the U.S. That's proven. Where's the proof that the FARC "fund themselves largely through the cocaine trade"? This is just a statement thrown out there as if it has been proven. It's typical disinformation (false propaganda) spread by the paid sycophant minions of the plutocrats.], while holding hundreds of kidnapped hostages for ransom and political ends. [Now that's true, and it's evil, just as are all the CIA and DIA torture dungeons holding innocent people.] The drug trafficking and kidnappings haven't helped their reputation, which is why both Correa and Chavez have denied supporting them.
The documents [allegedly; you will notice that "allegedly" is missing. That's intentional.] seized by U.S.-backed Colombian commandos suggest both leaders have been openly lying to the world, Naranjo said.
Killed in the bombing were Reyes, the FARC's top spokesman, and 20 other guerrillas. Ecuador recovered 19 bodies and three wounded female rebels, including a Mexican philosophy student. By then, Colombian soldiers had already carried out the cadavers of Reyes and another rebel, [allegedly] along with three laptops [allegedly] containing the sensitive documents.
Indignant, Chavez said "they wanted to show off the trophy" and called it "cowardly murder, all of it coldly calculated."
"This could be the start of a war in South America," Chavez said.
But Naranjo said laptops show Venezuela's growing responsibility for the conflict.
The [alleged] $300 million payment was mentioned in a Feb. 14 message in Reyes laptop, along with documents suggesting rebels discussed a possible arms transfer from Venezuela, and revealing close ties between Manuel "Sureshot" Marulanda, the top FARC leader, and Venezuela's government.
He quoted one message from Marulanda to Chavez saying "We will always be ready, in the case of gringo aggression, to provide our modest knowledge in defense of the Bolivarian revolution in Venezuela."
"This implies more than cozying up, but an armed alliance between the FARC and the Venezuelan government," Naranjo said.
Naranjo [alleged that]
saidother documents show deepening ties between the rebels and Correa. Ecuador acknowledged that its internal security minister, Gustavo Larrea, met with a FARC emissary but said the intent was strictly humanitarian to seek the release of hostages held by the rebel group.
Still another [alleged] document in Reyes' [alleged] laptop suggests the rebels sent Chavez money when he was jailed in 1992 for leading a coup attempt, Naranjo said. At the time, he was plotting the comeback that eventually led to his election as president in 1998.
"A note recovered from Raul Reyes speaks of how grateful Chavez was for the 100 million pesos (about $150,000 at the time) ... delivered to Chavez when he was in prison," Naranjo said, without giving any more details.
Venezuelan late Monday countered by displaying its own [allegedly] seized laptop in Caracas, saying it holds incriminating information about Naranjo.
Venezuelan Justice Minister Ramon Rodriguez Chacin said this laptop, [allegedly] belonging to Colombian drug lord Wilber Varela, who was found slain in Venezuela in January, held "important information and notes from the drug traffickers which involve General Oscar Naranjo in drug trafficking."
Rodriguez, who is Chavez's top law enforcement official, [alleged that]
saidboth Naranjo and his brother, who is imprisoned in Germany on drug charges [emphasis added], have links to traffickers. He also alleged [right] that the documents reveal bribes were paid to Colombia's defense minister to occupy posts, and that the Colombians had Varela killed.
Rodriguez also has been a key go-between in contacts with the FARC. He noted that Colombia's attack on the rebels came just after the FARC released four hostages to him, and said the "intent of the fascist Colombian government is to hamper the handover [sic] of hostages, because that is the path of peace." [That's obvious.]
Associated Press writers Frank Bajak and Vivian Sequera in Bogota; Gabriela Molina and Jeanneth Valdivieso in Quito, Ecuador; Diego Norona in Angostura, Ecuador; and Fabiola Sanchez, Jorge Rueda and Ian James in Caracas contributed to this report.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)