Written for Tehelka Magazine, New Delhi.

The two of us were posing as American
sex tourists in the middle of the Cambodian jungle, in a brothel called
"Hollywood". Sitting next to us—eyeing the prostitutes and sipping
beer provided by the pimps—were Chinese, Japanese and European
businessmen, mostly middle aged, in slacks and crisp-collared
short-sleeve shirts. But there were also teenage guys: Aussie, Israeli
and Scandinavian student-backpackers. What were they doing in
this fuliginous sideshow? Was "Hollywood" just an add-on novelty to
their daytime excursions to the nearby ruins of Angkor Wat? Surely, at
their age and with their young good looks, hooking up with young women
was  monetarily free and joyfully spontaneous.

The males patronizing "Hollywood" were not looking for joy or spontaneity.

Nor were they looking for women.

These guys, young and old, were shopping for girls—very young girls...

Across the darkened room, the prey was arranged in a glassed-in box. They were perched on three-tiered benches. No bunching together. They had been coached to keep themselves distributed to their best visual advantage. Occasionally, one would slide across the bench, or dart two rows up for no apparent reason. They donned identical uniforms: hot pink, short-sleeved, easily removable mini-dresses. The backdrop of their cage was draped, from ceiling to floor, in turquoise swags of satin. A fan rustled the material. The billowing and blue-green sheen created a nautical effect—a not-quite-healthy aquarium. Some of the girls, particularly the youngest—stared back at us through the glass partition. Others ignored us altogether, crossing their legs, wiggling their bare feet impatiently. Plastic broaches were pinned to their bodices—numbers easily read from our side of the room.  A client decided on his "date". He finished off his beer and uttered a number that, in turn, was barked out by the pimp. The corresponding girl jumped up, pink-streaked to the side, stopped at the congregation of flip-flops blocking the exit, toed into two, emerged on this side of the fish tank with the easy flash of a child's smile, took the hand of her date and led him down a dim corridor.

"Thirty dollars for yum-yum," the pimp told me. (Oral sex). "Forty dollars for boom-boom." (Vaginal or anal intercourse).  And for an extra ten bucks, I could have unprotected sex. No one inquired if I was HIV positive and, in any case, the girl would have been excluded from negotiations. Slaves don't negotiate. In the age of AIDS, pimping children is not only a crime against humanity, but a death sentence as well.

There are child sex slaves very near where you live. It goes on in every nation on this planet. Every night, little girls (and little boys) lead anonymous men down darkened hallways. The situation is now pandemic. There are estimated to be 30,000,000 slaves worldwide—more slaves today than at any other time in human history. Forced prostitution makes up between 50 and 60% of that group, many of them as young as seven and eight years old. As a money-making enterprise, the slavery business has never been more lucrative. It is a multi-billion dollar industry. In fact, it is the number two illegal enterprise in the world, nestled between drugs (number one) and arms (number three). According to US Ex-Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, within ten years, trafficking and human slavery will be the biggest illegal business in the world, overtaking drugs.

Where do all these young slaves come from? Many are abducted and trafficked to other countries. Nepali girls being kidnapped then trafficked to Indian brothels and the Middle East has been well documented for decades. Some young girls are sold to agents by their own relatives. Still others are lured by false promises of marriages or legitimate jobs in urban areas. Efforts to educate young girls about the various ruses before they fall victim, has met with some success, but the lures are ever changing, particularly with the arrival of the Internet. Today, girls are entrapped, and then sold via online communities where, by posting a picture and profile of themselves, they can get free email. Even E-Bay has been surreptitiously used to sell child prostitutes. In an Internet café in Cambodia I visited, a pop-up window automatically appeared on my screen as I attempted to sign on. The message purported to originate from the US Foreign Immigration Services. It read:


I looked around the Internet café to see who else would be viewing this on their monitors. Except for me, there wasn't a person older than sixteen—all typing away in search of a better life. Computers: The preferred 21st century site for predatory ambush, especially for victimizing the desperate youth of third world countries.

My buddy, Aaron Cohen, knows the predatory world of sex slaves just about as well as anyone. That was why I was with him in Cambodia: to report about his work. He is a contracted agent for the US State Department, has helped to free slaves in over forty countries, had a fatwa put out on him by Osama Bin Laden's military commander (Ayman-al-Zawahiri) for his undercover work in Sudan—Aaron even took a bullet to the chest last August in a Haitian brothel while trying to free a young girl. He is six-and-a-half feet of fearlessness with broad shoulders, glittery eyes and a Medusa-mop of curly black hair—not easy to forget, once seen. (The girls giggle and whisper to each other when he enters the brothels.)

After three nights of visiting many massage parlors, Aaron and I were becoming a familiar sight to the local underground. It became apparent that some of the brothels were Cambodian owned but that Vietnamese gangs controlled many others. Whatever the exact ratio, ample evidence had been accumulated to warrant calling in Special Ops to raid various brothels that specialized in the very, very young. One particularly egregious establishment called "Massage 333", right on the main tourist street of Siem Reap, showcased girls whose breasts were still unformed.  "How old are you?" I asked one little girl who called herself Kimi. "Eighteen," she answered. (My guess was that Kimi was eight, although it was impossible to prove. The first thing that happens when a girl is sold into slavery is that her identification papers are taken away from her.)

The Special Ops raid was conducted later that night. Twenty-eight underage girls, including Kimi, from three brothels were whisked away in vans that took them to safe houses—locations to remain unidentified. Aaron led the raids laden with ordinance. I wasn't cleared for the operation. We agreed to meet at our hotel dining room the next day at 7:00 am.

The following morning, before I could take the first sip of coffee, Aaron asked me how long it would take me to "grab my stuff". I lowered my cup. I had been out for a dawn photography shoot and all of my heavy equipment was still in the boot of my driver's car. The rest of my gear was in the hotel room. "Two minutes, max," I answered. "And I have a driver already waiting. Why? What went down?"

Aaron had just received a call saying that Vietnamese thugs were trawling the Siem Reap airport looking for "the two American guys". It seems that at least one of the brothels had been Vietnamese-owned—perhaps even controlled by the present Vietnamese regime. Each girl represented an annual earning potential of $100,000. Aaron and I had basically taken away a three million dollar business from the gang. They were not happy. No doubt there were an ample supply of young armed punks eager to earn their stripes within the hierarchy of the Vietnamese mafia by taking out a couple of double-crossing Yankees. 

I checked out at the front desk, met Aaron at the side of the hotel, and told my driver that there had been a change of plans. He sped off with his American cargo slumped down in the back seat. His order was to head for the capital of Phnom Penh. He didn't ask questions. The wad of money I had placed in his palm cured curiosity.

Twelve evasive hours later, including several switches of drivers, we checked into a Phnom Penh hotel that proved secure. "Twenty-eight girls freed!"  We congratulated ourselves. Also, the data accumulated would be integrated into an evidentiary package that would later be incorporated into the annual TIP (Traffic in Persons) Report published by the US State Department. That night over a glass of whisky, we toasted to the girls' escape.

But the truth is that there are thousands upon thousands of unwitting girls waiting to take those twenty-eight girls' places. No town is immune and no plan is in place to stop the growing abomination.

I live in Los Angeles. I could get in my car right now, drive twenty minutes to the real Hollywood, California, and have sex with a girl under the age of twelve. She might hail from Bangkok, Moscow, Bogotá or New Delhi. Her place of origin would be irrelevant. A child sex slave's final destination is what really counts. She has landed in a place called Hell.

Link to source-webpage by Mikel Dunham, obtained via: mikeldunham, January 16, 2007, 6:56pm


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.