JERUSALEM (AFP) - Loathed or loved by many Israelis, Peace Now this week marks 30 years as a movement which has deeply influenced public opinion but not achieved its vision of peace with the Palestinians.
The group plans to celebrate three decades of activism and anti-settlement battles on Tuesday at a Tel Aviv square named after prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, who was assassinated after addressing a peace rally there in 1995.
...Peace Now, which calls itself Israel's oldest peace movement, has drawn hundreds of thousands of Israelis to its rallies, and some of its activists have gone on to win parliamentary seats.
It has also taken its campaign against Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank to Israel's highest court. The international community considers the settlements illegal and a key hurdle to Middle East peace.
"Peace Now was established to fight the settler movement," says Sammy Smooha, a sociology professor at Haifa University.
"It has provided information on settlements and demonstrated that they are counterproductive for Israeli security and the peace process."
The peace movement was a counterforce to hardline Jews who settled the West Bank and Gaza Strip after their occupation in the 1967 Middle East war.
RLCC Comment: Peace Now is wrongly accused of making things worse by getting Israelis out of Gaza. Peace Now wants to go much further than that, which makes a huge difference — not enough but still huge. They are for being much more decent to Palestinians. However, the two-state solution doesn't allow for a non-racist state of Israel.
What other nation-state gets to be based upon an ethnic group's permanent dominance? Basing higher legal rights on ethnicity is inherently evil. Such ethnic discrimination is illegal in the U.S., yet, so many Americans favor such discrimination for Israel. It's hypocrisy: A double standard.
If it's right for the Jews in Israel, then it's right for every other ethnic group on the planet. Each ethnic group need only violently assert itself to take over whatever land it covets and force out those who are already there. That's just might makes right. It's just Darwinism. It's just the law of the jungle. Is that enlightened? Hardly.
, obtained via: , April 7, 2008, 12:29pm