Alan Greenspan is aware of the history of the Federal Reserve. He's fully aware of what transpired at Jekyll Island.

President Wilson

Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it....

I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world, no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.[93]

Greenspan knows that J.P. Morgan; the Rothschilds; Paul Warburg; Kuhn, Loeb and Company; Jacob Schiff; and others were behind the creation of the Federal Reserve. He knows they were behind it not out of the goodness in their hearts but out of their huge selfishness (greed).

Greenspan knows that Nelson W. Aldrich was in their hip pocket. Aldrich was the U.S. Senator (David Rockefeller's father-in-law) who managed (finagled) the wholly evil, despicable Federal Reserve Act through Congress. Reportedly, his co-conspirators and he secretly met at Jekyll Island to put the finishing touches on their selfish, greedy, elitist scheme to come to totally monopolize the people's currency. They weren't called robber barons for nothing you know.

That meeting at Jekyll Island reportedly was so secret that the attendees had agreed in advance not to use their last names during the entire stay. In fact, they used code words concerning their destination rather than referring to it as Jekyll Island. Their train was sealed. They also had the club at Jekyll Island give all the regular staff a vacation off the island and brought in different servants from the mainland who would not recognize the attendees. This was top secret and definitely not for national security unless the nation is considered the nation of the spirit of the devil. Secrecy was paramount to shield the criminal conspiracy to steal the power of America, the rising empire that would inherit the British Empire. It was also no coincidence that J. P. Morgan owned the island.

Greenspan knows how the Federal Reserve came into being (dishonestly and sneakily, etc.). He knows that Andrew Jackson and others were dead set against private central banking and why. Jackson killed the bank once. Unfortunately, the Hydra has more than one head.

Greenspan understands fully how fractional-reserve banking works and how the private central bankers are usurers who rushed laws through Congress so that they could be set up to receive interest on their private bank notes printed at their sole command and that only their private bank notes would be legal. In other words, Alan Greenspan knows that there is a private monopoly on earning interest on bank notes printed out of thin air with no government auditing of the system. He also knows that such has not always been the case and that when it wasn't often things were much better. He knows that the problems in the system between times when there were such private central banks didn't have to be addressed by reinstituting private central banking and private currency monopolization. There were better alternatives.

He knows the difference between laissez-faire capitalism and populism. He hates populism. He tries his best to twist the concept of populism in the minds of the people. Populism is the ideology in favor of rights and power of the people against the self-authorizing privileged elite. Greenspan is for the privileged elite rather than the people. Therefore, he lies about populism by trying to get the very people populism favors wrongly to believe that populism is dictatorship when in fact, the privileged elite are the obvious evil- selfish-hearted dictators (Plutocrats).

Alan Greenspan knows the difference between the teachings of Jesus Christ and the teachings of laissez-faire capitalism.

This is the central issue for the entire world.

Not only do Greenspan and his ilk and the band that owns him twist the meaning of populism, they also twist the teachings and exemplary life of Jesus. They do it for the same reason. The teaching and life of Jesus was and remains about the people over the self-authorizing privileged elite. If you're wondering why I say self-authorizing when Jesus said they received their authority from above, it's because evil spirits are at war with God for the minds and souls of human kind. Human beings take on the wrong spirits from above. They take on the rebel spirit, the spirit against righteousness. It is that rebel spirit that gives them authority. It won't stand though, because the rebellion doesn't win out in the end. God's true nature prevails in the heart, minds, and souls of the people who come to dominate by being level (all serving all unselfishly; all rising endlessly). It's beautiful. Greenspan hates it though in his knowing ignorance (a seeming paradox).

He knows there is a class structure in place. Alan gets his bread buttered by the plutocrats president Wilson was speaking about above. The enemies of Andrew Jackson pay Alan Greenspan to do and say what he has done and said and continues doing and saying. Alan is a mouthpiece to deceive the people so they will continue following and falling for the distortions and obfuscations of the ultra-rich, all of whom know full well that they stand directly in opposition to Jesus Christ and all real Christian teachings and sentiments.

He knows the gap between the rich and the rest has been steadily rising, but he barely mummers about it. He'll say something here or there just enough to throw the people a curve so they'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

The wealth gap is obscene. It is immoral. It is unhealthy. Nothing good comes from it. All the promises made by those who gave more to the rich (huge tax-breaks for the rich) have not come to pass. Trickle-down economics is a total fraud. The rich bring forth liability only. Their entire system is a drain. They deplete. Their so-called externalities result in a negative position after everything has been measured. They devour and give back crap that isn't fit to manure the fields to bring forth organic abundance via God's harmonizing creation. Their spirit causes negative vibrations to ripple through the universe. It comes back in the form of all the disturbances we see in everything. They aren't tuned in enough to sense it though. They're blinded by their selfishness.

Alan Greenspan knows that the movement to deregulation caused both the dot-com bubble and the subprime-mortgage bubble. Not all regulation is good mind you. Only that which voluntarily self-restrains through a properly working, moral conscience (tuned into Godliness) properly regulates.

Satan regulates too but wrongly. He punishes the wicked but also the innocent. He coerces. He hardens hearts. God though softens hearts. People must come to understand as Jesus saw things so they may know which spirit is which. Jesus knew. That's why the other spirit crucified him. It exposed itself by so doing however, which Jesus knew was the point. Jesus was smarter. The trickster was outed by the highest honesty.

Greenspan knows Milton Friedman's 1980's libertarian capitalist series "Free to Choose" that was aired on the Public Broadcasting System advocated against environmental regulation and green-energy initiatives. He's aware of the shift back from power to the people to power to the elites that occurred during the "me" generation that came up on the heels of the more-so "we" generation. He knows what happened when Yuppiedom took over the hearts and minds and souls of the vast majority of people who had been harmed by other forms of confusion and unbridled lust and who in the process lost their understanding of peace and love and the search for meaningful philosophies of life. He knows materialism replaced the spirit of compassion in large measure. He knows that had the spirit of good stewardship that is environmentalism had not suffered a backslide (recidivism), the world would not be facing the huge human-caused (selfishness-caused; greed-caused) climate disturbances it is facing. The selfish and greedy are still arguing that the spirit of selfishness has nothing to do with it. They are ignorant at best.

Alan Greenspan knew what the dot-com bubble was before it burst, and he let that information slip out. Did he let it out for the sake of plausible deniability? Are people capable of knowingly lying or distorting so much that they begin to believe their own lies and distortions?

Greenspan knows that the private central bank is what it is. He won't say in public though that it's evil. He won't say that the non-coercive giving-and-sharing economy is the righteous choice over laissez-faire capitalism even though in his heart he knows it is. He gets paid not to tell the truth but to tell falsehoods.

Is this judging and sentencing Alan Greenspan? No, it's truth-telling for a warning. Alan can yet turn. I'm not for punishing him. I'm for blessing him with the truth. It's up to Alan which spirit he'll follow though. It's up to the spirits which spirit will get to him — reach him (a seeming paradox).

Read the post: "Chapter 51 Den of Thieves: Money Changers: Supplement: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSERVATIVE-REPUBLICAN CHRISTIAN: Jesus is a small-c communist."


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.