Did you know that Benjamin Disraeli, creator of Britain's modern Conservative party, made speeches and wrote books proclaiming the innate superiority of the Jewish race? Winston Churchill and his father, Randolph, both followed in Disraeli's racist attitudes.

Winston was particularly repulsive with his racist views, statements, and writings. He sounded just like a Nazi only towards Arabs and others. We have many of his racist views documented on this site. Do a search on him, and you'll find some of the completely disgusting things he advocated (eugenics for example). Yet, he is held up in such high regard by so many. They are severely misguided if they look up to these racists. Thank God these Jews are not indicative of all Jews. Thank God for the Jews who stand up to the likes of these racist Jews to tell them they are completely wrong.

Right now, certain neocons working in the U.S. State Department under Condi Rice and in the major, mainstream, media corporations are busying themselves trying to conflate anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism, which of course is a logical fallacy. What is being passed off as Zionism today is not the same thing as Semitism and never will be. Also, to be anti such so-called Zionism (false-Zionism since real Zionism is pacifistic: "Peace") has nothing to do with even remotely suggesting that being a descendant of Jacob (Israel) means one has an inherent character flaw above or beyond the general fall of the whole of humanity. Jesus was a Jew afterall. In addition, those who hold against that false-Zionism bear no responsibility for anti-Semites who likewise hold forth against that Zionism.

To say otherwise is to say that all people who are anti-Nazi are anti-German, as if both are the same and that being anti-Nazi somehow promotes being anti-German or is a form of hate speech that should be punished, etc.

Such a position is as dumb as dumb can be. It is because we have such unenlightened thinkers in high places that the world is in such dire straits.

Condi Rice and all the neocons must go permanently.

To those who think they can deflate what I'm saying by suggesting that I'm equating Zionists with Nazis, first read what Winston said. I say what he advocated was in line with Nazism in many respects only to be directed toward other than Jews. Also be sure you know the history of well-poisonings and false-flag operations and other measures taken by the so-called Zionist founding fathers of Israel. Be sure you know the statements of many of them that make clear their racist positions.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.