The following block-quoted material came from a blog site entitled "Antisemitism." I will intersperse commentary.

"Carter Accuses Israel of Starving Gaza," April 18, 2008. According to the "Antisemitism" site, the post's content originated at

It is noteworthy that comments on the post are closed. One may assume that the site administrator(s)/owner(s) doesn't want to hear from people telling the site where it is wrong on the subject. Of course, the site might truly be subjected to evil spam from real anti-Semites rather than non-anti-Semites, such as Jimmy Carter who are attacked for speaking out against Israeli atrocities just the way people were initially attacked for speaking out against Apartheid South Africa. If people such as Jimmy Carter never spoke out against the Nazis, where would the rest of the Jews be now?

Former US President Jimmy Carter says Palestinians living in Gaza are being "starved to death" by Israel.

Carter leveled the accusation while speaking to students at the American University in Cairo on Thursday, saying that Gaza Arabs are receiving fewer calories per day than people in the poorest regions of Africa. "It's an atrocity, what is being perpetrated as punishment on the people in Gaza," said Carter. "It is a crime. I think it is an abomination that this continues to go on."

His accusation is particularly despicable since he has not even stepped foot in Gaza for one thing. Secondly, he failed to mention the tons of humanitarian aid which Israel authorizes and to that end, that the crossings are open DAILY to take food for truckloads of food, medical supplies and other necessities into Gaza. Thirdly, he neglected to mention that the region's crossings with the rest of Israel have been closed since the Islamist Hamas terrorist organization seized total control of the area and began launching constant attacks on Israeli civilians.

As for neglecting to mention things (more like deliberately trying to avoid the truth), look who's calling the kettle black?

First of all, Carter wanted to go into Gaza but was refused by the Israeli authorities.

Secondly, when was the last time the writer(s) of the post was in Gaza, since one apparently has to have been there recently to know whether or not people are being deprived of basic necessities.

Thirdly, the volume of material and supplies crossing into Gaza is for some 1.5 million people. Just because materials and supplies get in doesn't mean it's enough. Israel has also regularly undermined Gaza's water and energy supply.

Fourthly, Hamas is the duly elected government of Gaza. The people of Gaza voted for Hamas in free, fair, heavily monitored, certified, open elections. That's better than what we have in the U.S. As for Hamas being "Islamist," what is that? Islam is Islam. A Muslim is a Muslim. They are Muslims. The Jews are Jews. There are people calling themselves Jews (plenty of them in Israel) who want Torah law just as many calling themselves Muslims want sharia. However, Hamas doesn't want sharia. They had some connection with the Brotherhood in Egypt, but that has a great deal to do with the "enemy of my enemy is my friend" sort of thinking. In addition, the Brotherhood has moderated.

If the Likudniks lose power forever because the Israelites wake up, then the Muslims won't be so radicalized to sharia. Of course, the Likudniks want the Muslims radicalized so the U.S. will attack so the Likudniks can take more land to hold.

Hamas is not part of some monolithic block any more than there was ever a Communist Block or anymore than all Jews think alike.

Think about that. Is there an ethnic group that is comprised of people with a greater range of differing views than Jews? Jews are just like many other tribes. There is a wide range of views on many subjects. Jewishness is not monolithic. It isn't homogeneous really. Look at the different class-strata with the European Jews affording themselves the top positions in Jewish society and many often looking down their noses at Asian Jews and African Jews, etc.

Also, the rockets falling on Israel are designed as retaliation. They are also designed to remind the Israelis that the Israelis stole the land and to wear them down. You who posted this ("Carter Accuses Israel of Starving Gaza") would fire rockets at people stealing your land. Don't be a hypocrite. Rocket fire is evil, but stealing land first is the greater sin. The false-Zionists (real Zion is pure peace for all humans) were the instigators. Instigators who know better always have the primary responsibility. The false-Zionists clearly conspired going into Palestine and in carrying out the evils they euphemize as "ethnic cleansing" and "transfer," etc. It's well documented. It can't be covered up. It's coming out more and more.

Not once did he blame Hamas for the condition of the people over whom it is ruling.

Who's blockading whom? Who stole whose land?

Jimmy Carter has stated openly that the violence on both sides is wrong. However, Hamas didn't drive out the Jews. The Jews horned in and "transferred" the Palestinians off their land and out of their homes and businesses. They cut down their orchards, bulldozed their homes, poisoned their wells, and even went door-to-door cutting throats. They even blew up their own people in false-flag operations. Of course, not all Jews did these things. Nevertheless, it was upon such terrorist acts that especially revisionist-type Zionists such as Ze'ev Jabotinsky built the current state of Israel. Be real. Be honest.

It has all been excused by many Jews as a "natural" reaction to what was done to Jews through the ages and culminating with the Nazis. Well, what the Nazis did was insane and the reaction is to be driven insane by it. That doesn't make it right. One is to overcome the insanity. That's what Carter is saying to the Jews.

Case in point: At the very same time yesterday that Carter was denigrating Israeli treatment of Gaza residents, Hamas terrorists infiltrated through the Keren Shalom Crossing and attacked an IDF post while trucks were passing through the crossing with provisions for Gaza residents.

Look, this is a standard ploy by one-sided Jews. They speak as it evil only starts with each incident. There is no chain — no cause and effect. It's stupid. Don't fall for it if you've been warned, or you're stupid. The Gazans who infiltrated through the Keren Shalom Crossing and attacked an IDF post will say that it was in retaliation for earlier Israeli abuses and especially the theft of the land in the first place. Also, Jimmy Carter is talking about collective punishment against every Gazan. That's something that this Jew or these particular Jews are conveniently ignoring. Furthermore, who's a terrorist? Hamas is labeled a terrorist by some, while Hamas thinks the Likudniks are terrorists.

Frankly, Israel was built upon terrorism. It was built upon the evil spirit of covetousness. The Jews were wanderers, saw the "Land of Milk and Honey," and coveted it. They were willing to commit mass murder to steal it from its current occupants. That goes way back to before Moses. It goes back to Abraham.

The mitigating factor is always the degree of evil on the part of those from whom the Jewish line from Abraham stole the land. Mitigating factors don't though make theft and murder right. Furthermore, leading up to 1948, the Palestinians weren't doing the things condemned in the Torah that supposedly justified the Jews ethnically cleansing Canaan.

What right did any Jews have to do to the Palestinians what has been done to them? If they think God authorized it, their crazy. They haven't acted in a Godly manner toward the Palestinians — not even close.

In defiance of the American government, Carter is meeting today in Damascus with Hamas politburo chief Khaled Mashaal, who is the apparent power behind Gilad Shalit's kidnappers.

This shows a complete lack of understanding of the position and standing a former U.S. president. Current governments in the U.S. don't tell former presidents with whom they may talk. It isn't done. I've seen the neocons headlines that even have the audacity to say that Carter has "defied" Israel. Wake up. In the U.S. the neocons only have a say by the skin on their teeth. They don't have and never did have a mandate. They acted as if they did, which was dumb on the mundane political level. George W. Bush's rating is in at the bottom of the barrel when compared with other presidents. He's been sitting way down and will stay there for the rest of his term barring some further, treasonous, false-flag chicanery. After that, his rating will go even lower. Defy the American government? It's an illegal government. Wake up! It has engaged in all sorts of illegal, impeachable activities in numerous spheres. They've cheated in numerous elections. It's documented. It's irrefutable. They've illegally spied on Americans and others. They've violated numerous treaties concerning torture, weapons, prisoners, human rights, wars. They bribed an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. They gave Antonin Scalia's son a job while Scalia sent a memo to his Republican allies on the Court calling for them to move as a block to stop the free, fair, open re-counting of ballots in Florida, which Al Gore obviously won hands down. The list goes and on and on. A person can't even be alive and not be defying this illegal government.

As for Gilad Shalit, what about the many thousands of Palestinians who are rounded up and imprisoned without trial? Aren't they kidnapped? Yes, they are kidnapped. You whine about Gilad Shalit, who was working to protect land thieves, yet you have nothing to say about the plight of the victims of those land thieves. Thank God, literally, that your position is fast becoming the minority amongst Jews worldwide.

One of our subscribers wrote in yesterday to say that he is "embarrassed and ashamed" at Carter's behavior and suggested that his defiance against the government and country he once served as president should earn him exile. "If I was there, when his plane landed bringing him back to Georgia, I'd refuse him entry into the United States!" this subscriber wrote.

Whoever is calling for the exile of Jimmy Carter has no idea how much support Carter has. He has so much more support for what he is doing than any of you seem to realize. Calling for his exile is only going to backfire in your faces. People are getting sicker and sicker of what the Israelis are doing. Support of Israel is going to have the bottom fall out. Jews in the U.S. are a minority. All the greedy Jewish billionaires won't be able to stop a large majority from changing things dramatically.

Look, the longer things drag on and the more things come out, the weaker Israel's position is becoming. Don't you see that? The Likudniks are losing out to the truth, as they ought to. You are never going to convince the majority of Americans that being Nazi-like is the right way to go. The trend has been away from that since the beginning. The fascists always take one step forward but then two back. Open your eyes. Satan looses, thank God, literally. You better turn, repent, and atone.

Dozens of other American subscribers wrote in and asked me to please convey to the people of Israel that thousands and thousands of Americans are furious and appalled at Carter's "coddling" of terrorists and denigration of Israel.

You're living in make-believe land. More people are quietly saying "Yes" about what Carter is doing. That is quickly turning from quietly and privately to publicly and loudly. He's changing the whole debate. You know it too, and it has you quaking in your boots. He's resetting the agenda. There's a new president coming, and Jimmy Carter is making the discussion turn to human rights, where it ought to be. He's exposing the horrendously selfish and evil actions of the Likudniks who must go or Israel will go.

If the Jews in Israel don't turn away from their covetousness and start being humanitarians toward all human beings, God will once again not protect the state of Israel. The idea of certain Jews that Jews are innately superior is a falsehood. The idea that human beings are not a family is what separates off those certain Jews as spiritually akin to the Nazis. The human race is one family that needs to be one spiritual family under the true God whose nature has not been properly interpreted and understood by orthodox Judaism. Again, wake up!

Logic is defeating you. You can't win. Give up the wrong side. Change. Convert.

Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., told FOX News that "at best, President Carter is being naive" in trying to negotiate with avowed terrorists. "There is a long list of people who thought they could reason with dictators and killers, going back to Neville Chamberlain and Hitler in the 1930s, but it has been shown to be absolutely wrong."

Joseph Lieberman is self-serving. Anyone following him is lost.

Who were the IRA? It was the Irish Republican Army. The Brits called them terrorists. Now they are the government. Who was, and is, Shin Bet? They were heavily armed resistors some of whom did acts of terrorism. They though were terrorized first. The British terrorized. Then after talks (which you apparently would have been against since talking with "terrorists" is inherently wrong), they renounced violence and joined the government. Who was Ze'ev Jabotinsky? Was he a false-Jew, false-Zionist terrorist? Yes, of course he was. Did the Nazis deem the French Resistance a bunch of terrorists? Yes, of course they did.

One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. Look at the Nicaraguan Contras. They terrorized the hell out of people. Reagan secretly funded them, knowing all about it, and then lied about that and pleaded that he should be forgiven for having a split personality about it. He said he couldn't believe he authorized illegal arms deals, but that the facts speak otherwise. Forgive that? That wasn't repentance. One can forgive him only on the level Jesus forgave the mob from the cross for being plain stupid. It wasn't after they repented. That's a different level of forgiveness.

As for Neville Chamberlain, I suggest Joseph Lieberman and you read a little deeper into history. Chamberlain was buying time while the weak British military was being built up. If he had gotten into Hitler's face right from the start, Britain would not have been able to back it up. Hitler was in a position to beat the hell out of Britain, and the U.S. was in no position at the time to come to the rescue. Also, Hitler was an imperialist. He wanted the other powers to agree to his expansion for farming land. Well, being competitive (capitalists), the British didn't want Germany as an equal or superior rival. They didn't give their okay, and Poland fought back killing Germans, which just helped to kindle Hitler's wrath. Of course, Hitler had all sorts of ideas about Jewish bankers and who undercut Germany in the First World War.

Now, you can say that those Jews had a right to make a buck in the cut-throat world of high finance of military-industrial complexes such as was Germany before and during both wars, or you can say that the whole system stinks, which is what I say. Those particular Jewish financiers were evil, and Hitler was evil. There were plenty of Gentile demons to go around too. It has never been proper to make it a question of which side in the argument between the Nazis and Jewish financiers was right. It certainly has been a total falsehood that Jewish bankers had nothing to do with Germany's defeat. Of course, I wouldn't want to redo history so that the Prussians prevailed in WWI or WWII. What I'm looking for is an end to war. It won't end until the money for it isn't handed over to the war-mongers regardless of their ethnicity.

You see, it is totally evil that the U.S. and other corporations sell weapons to both sides. As my Earthly father used to say, "Let them fight it out with rocks and sticks." They shouldn't be fighting at all, but why supply all these nations with even second-tier technology? Of course, it's for a profit and the U.S. always holds the huge edge (for a while). It's going to have to use it before the next superpower develops too much or the U.S. will lose its evil position. One of the problems with the system though is that the weapons are becoming more and more destructive and toxic and uncontrollable, meaning if the wrong leader gets in, that leader could instantly create all-out Hell on Earth.

Just imagine if the insane Hermann Khan had had his finger on the nuclear button. He would have pushed it preemptively or preventively — take your choice. The results would have been nuclear fallout severely irradiating the entire surface of the Earth. How many people and other creatures would have died from radiation sickness and burns who weren't initially incinerated? If anyone could have survived, what kind of life (if one could call it that) would they have been able to live?

Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., told FOX News that she advocates revoking Carter's passport and supports a measure to withdraw all federal funding from his Georgia-based institution, the Carter Center.

This Sue Myrick is advocating that Condi Rice pull President Carter's Passport while Rice is on the edge of being forced from office for her roll in authorizing torture? Is that brilliant? Condi Rice should fall to her knees begging God for forgiveness for her diabolical scheming. As for pulling federal funding for the Carter Center, the Carter Center is a center for the advancement of peace worldwide. Sue Myrick has no business being in a leadership position. The people of North Carolina need to follow someone else. Sue Myrick is antichrist.

Where is the righteousness in any of what this post, "Carter Accuses Israel of Starving Gaza," is about? There is none. It is devoid of righteousness. It doesn't call for righteousness. It actually calls for an increase in evil means and ends, which always go together.

You (post author(s)) also cite only FOX News. Pull your head out of the sand. You're being an ostrich. FOX News is losing credibility with the masses by the second. It isn't good journalism. Don't you know that? If you don't care after being made aware of it, you're headed for deeper Hell than before.

FOX News is a product of Rupert Murdock. He's a monopolist. He is trying to consolidate and monopolize what the people with and won't hear for the sake of his personal, private, special privilege and advantage.

John McCain says he admires Teddy Roosevelt. Roosevelt would bust up News Corp and the other media giants as the interlocking trusts that they are. I'm not saying that coercion is right mind you. I'm just telling you that the U.S. was supposedly founded on anti-monarchical principles and trusts are more in line with monarchies than not. Personally, whether a monarchy is right or wrong depends solely upon the character of the given monarch. Murdock isn't fit to reign.

"We have a policy in this country about Hamas and he is deliberately undermining that policy," Myrick said. "Why should we support his center when he will not support his government?"

Who is "we"? George W. Bush is not the duly elected president of the U.S. He cheated to get elected. If the Republicans had not cheated Al Gore would still be the president, and we would have moved on Global Warming. That's not some blanket endorsement of all things Al Gore by the way, far from it. He's just erring less than George W. Bush by quite a bit on many extremely important fronts. There's plenty of negative criticism of Al Gore on this site. A simple site-search will turn it up for anyone who doubts it or wants to see and to learn more.

Good for her!

No, bad for her, Sue Myrick. What she and you ("Antisemitism" blog site author(s)) are advocating is bad. It's wrong. It's evil. You support evil acts by Israel that started the problem by horning into Palestine and undertaking stealing the land, etc. Again, if you think God is supporting that, you're crazy. God is not for people stealing land or coveting it under any rationalizing, self-deluding scheme, no matter how old or in what book it is recorded. Jesus came from God with the New Testament that says don't be a hypocrite. Hypocrisy is Israel's problem. Fix it or else is what God says.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • Muslims Against Sharia Urge Support for Sue Myrick's "Wake Up America" Initiative

      Wake Up America

      1. Investigate all military chaplains endorsed by Abdurahman Alamoudi, who was imprisoned for funding a terrorist organization.

      2. Investigate all prison chaplains endorsed by Alamoudi.

      3. Investigate the selection process of Arabic translators working for the Pentagon and the FBI.

      4. Examine the non-profit status of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

      5. Make it an act of sedition or solicitation of treason to preach or publish materials that call for the deaths of Americans.

      6. Audit sovereign wealth funds in the United States.

      7. Cancel scholarship student visa program with Saudi Arabia until they reform their text books, which she claims preach hatred and violence against non-Muslims.

      8. Restrict religious visas for imams who come from countries that don't allow reciprocal visits by non-Muslim clergy.

      9. Cancel contracts to train Saudi police and security in U.S. counterterrorism tactics.

      10. Block the sale of sensitive military munitions to Saudi Arabia.

      Muslims Against Sharia urge every American to send a letter of support to Congresswoman Myrick. Sample letter is provided below.


      The Honorable Sue Myrick

      230 Cannon House Office Building

      Washington, D.C. 20515

      Phone:(202) 225-1976

      Fax:(202) 225-3389

      Dear Congresswoman Myrick,

      As an American who is concerned with issue of terrorism, I applaud your efforts to prevent radical Islam from infiltrating American society. I wholeheartedly support your "Wake Up America" plan, as well as other initiatives of The Anti-Terrorism Caucus. You bring honor to the title of the United States Representative.




      Contact info (optional)


      Please print out, sign, and mail or fax this letter to Congresswoman Myrick at the address / fax above. Feel free to modify the letter as you see fit. [Muslims Against Sharia.]

    • Hello to you who call yourselves "Muslims Against Sharia,"

      People will see what's going on with U.S. undercover psyops agents. They are using shells and front organizations posing as Muslims. They put people up to this sort of stuff. It's why they lose in the end. It's the prophecy unfolding before your very eyes, and I'm not hiding. I'm telling you openly. That's no theory by the way, but it sure is a conspiracy.

      They definitely plan to do what they do. Sometimes (quite often), they announce it. They did announce that they would be pulling out the stops to try to reach Muslims to convert them to so-called moderate Islam. They have speakers giving lectures to Iraqis they are holding prisoner (whether guilty or innocent — just rounded up). They bring in self-styled Islamic revisionists to work on the prisoners in psychological warfare. It's the wrong path. It's false-hearted.

      Getting them to convert to real Christianity is the right way, but the neocons would hate that since the neocons are based upon the current "state" of Israel, which is based by the false-Zionists (anti-peace) upon a false brand of Judaism.

      Real Christianity is the real Judaism revealed by God through Jesus.

      Judah, the son of Jacob (Israel), loves Jesus.

      Oh, Jesus said, How long shall I suffer you? Mark 9:19. I doubt very many sites that disagree with you would allow your comment. Did you even read the post before submitting? Did you read anything else on this site (which demolishes your false-hearted position)? Even if you read it, you didn't think.

      The post to which you link in the comment further links to what is claimed to be your home site: Reform Islam.

      Your comment and sites are so farfetched that one can't help but wonder if it is just a complete facade for Likudnik false propaganda.

      It has been written by the U.S. so-called intelligence community that they are going to work at convincing Muslims to start believing that there is something called moderate Islam. Your comment and sites fall right in line with that.

      Who are you? What are your names? Where do you live? Why do you hide? Step out into the light where everyone can see you, or do you fear being further exposed. "P.O. Box 241732, Omaha, NE 68124" could be anyone including the CIA or some other part of the alphabet soup called "intelligence."

      Jimmy Carter has been doing the God blessed work of a peacemaker. However, you actually come onto this site and try to promote someone who hates that peacemaking. At the same time, you are dull-minded enough to be extremely and plainly hypocritical in calling for the moderation of Mohammed's teachings. Your comment and sites are an insult to righteousness and real intelligence.

      Jimmy Carter's peacemaking effort is tremendous. The real Heaven is for what he's doing. They want him to become one hundred percent consistent before he leaves this plane of existence.

      Many billions of people would have been right there with him in the flesh except they can't afford it, it would be burning too much global warming fuel, and don't have the standing in society such that the evil-doers wouldn't dare lay a hand on them. They are with him though in spirit, and he knows it. They are praying for him.

      Well, I'm speaking out clearly and plainly.

      You come along claiming to be moderate while supporting Sue Myrick's evil, Draconian measures against innocent people who have had nothing to do with what misguided self-styled, self-authorized leaders have done on all sides. Her measures are all one-sided and hypocritical, which is the standard neocon position that leads straight to Hell. She's a war-monger, a torture-monger, a spy-monger, a lie-monger, and against the letter and more importantly the spirit of the Bill of Rights (which includes habeas corpus) and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and more so the New Commandment. A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. John 13:34

      She is an enemy of the New Commandment, and so far, so are you. In short, her positions and yours are demonic.

      Your idea of moderating (morphing via psyops) Islam into something that doesn't follow its foundational principles, as wrong as those are, is ludicrous. It reminds me of the people who call themselves Christians who claim war is justified. They aren't real Christians, and no one who believes the falsehood you are preaching can be a Muslim.

      Your way is the path of the devil. Muslims aren't to "moderate." They're to convert to Jesus. Orthodox Jews aren't to "moderate." They too are to convert to Jesus. That goes for the Hindu nationalists and the atheists and all secularists too.

      You really think that just getting your twisted propaganda out there will do it just because it has worked in the past. You don't understand. What I'm saying here is having so much more force in the world than what you are saying. Your way is losing reverberation. You're losing. You will lose completely. Your side loses. Why do you keep fighting for the losers: The unrighteous and selfish?

      Your site says, "The majority of the terrorist acts of the last three decades, including the 9/11 attacks, were perpetrated by Islamic fundamentalists in the name of Islam." That's unsupportable and denies that 9/11 has been the subject of a massive cover-up. The so-called terrorists were far from Islamic fundamentalists. Real Islamic fundamentalists don't go to nightclubs to drink hard liquor and watch the nearly naked women parade around.

      Oh, I'm aware of the claims that there are followers called Takfiri who supposedly vow a war by whatever means necessary for Islam to prevail, including blending into other cultures, even adopting sexual depravity as a cover for their plans of espionage, sabotage, death, and destruction. That isn't real fundamentalist Islam though. Mohammed didn't teach that. Look, I don't care what you say to the contrary, Islam is what Mohammed taught, just as Christianity is what Jesus taught. That's how it is. If you change from what Mohammed taught, you're talking about a different religion and not changing Islam. The same applies concerning Jesus and Christianity. Islam and Christianity aren't religions based upon usage. They are fixed by definition of what their founders said and did. If you want something different, call it something other than Islam or Christianity. I want what Jesus talked about and showed. It's the best.

      Why did the so-called leader of the cell (Atta) get a $100,000 wire transfer right before 9/11 from General Mahmud Ahmad, the chief of Pakistani intelligence (ISI)? More importantly, why has nothing been done to follow up on that in public? ISI is in bed with the CIA on many levels.

      You need to dig into the real truth. You need to see the patterns and connect the dots, as they say. Follow the money. Who has become much richer? Trace it back to the sources and you'll end up face-to-face with the real "masterminds" who pulled it off and then use their other techniques to move on: To move the public mind on — To attempt to get the public to believe that resistance to the psyops is futile. It isn't though.

      It also doesn't define terrorist acts. The U.S. Military's "Shock and Awe" was an act of terror. It was designed to send fear through the Iraqis to get them to submit and surrender. They were supposed to conclude that resistance is futile. It didn't work because it's based upon evil selfishness.

      In 1984, one US Army lieutenant colonel Michael Aquino, a psychological operations specialist, was being investigated by the military concerning allegations of pedophilia surrounding a daycare center at The Presidio of San Francisco when it was still a US Army post. No charges were brought against Aquino. He was protected by his fellows. Aquino was a member of the Church of Satan but split off as a founder of the Temple of Set (Set referring to the Egyptian god of whom Aquino holds Satan is a derivative). This concept is the opposite of unity and oneness and wholeness as expressed by Jesus.

      The Set followers are solipsistic, meaning they hold that the self is the only knowable reality (not self in God and God's self in one but rather the self as willpower apart from God). This stream is heading in the opposite direction of Jesus Christ. It is antichrist. It is the individual human will above all. It leads to the Leopold and Loeb mentality. It is in line with Nietzsche, Machiavelli, Ayn Rand, humanism (the apostate brand), libertarianism (also the apostate brand), militarism, capitalism, etc., which cascades into sociopathy where others are seen as there to do with as the strong please since to evil minds, survival of the fittest is the law and the fittest are those most capable of ruthlessness for selfish aims. Lust can easily be unbridled. Appetites, distorted by abuse, can be hedonistically indulged without compassion. The downward spiral is all rationalized away. These currents never lead to Christlikeness. They never lead to giving and sharing all freely. They always lead to taking for self at the expense of others. They license deception to achieve their aims, which they often claim are ennobling no matter how depraved. It is the hypocritical direction.


      Along with retired major general Paul E. Vallely, who has been a senior military analyst for FOX News, Aquino co-authored a paper entitled, From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory. That paper advocated in 1980 much of the mindset that is being projected now by the US military. The basic tenets of the paper include being absolutely convincing that you will outlast any enemy (never quitting) and completely dominating mass media both foreign and domestic including not allowing the home front to hear or see any information coming from the other side. By extension, this leads to terrorizing (if the first stages in the MindWar fail) an enemy into believing in the futility of resistance.

      Fascinated by Nazi paganism, Aquino conducted satanic rituals at Nazi SS (Schutzstaffel; defense echelon) chief Heinrich Himmler's Wewelsburg Castle in Bavaria. Aquino wrote about the ritual he conducted at Himmler's castle as follows:

      ... the Wewelsburg was conceived by Heinrich Himmler to be the "Mittelpunkt der Welt" (Middle of the World), and as the focus of the Hall of the Dead was to be the Gate of that Center, to summon the Powers of Darkness at their most powerful locus.

      Are you connecting the dots yet? Perhaps as a propagandist, you knew all of this. Well, others will be reading it for the first time. They'll go out searching using Google, etc. They may run into "The Finders" and the "Franklin Pedophile" case and how it connects directly to the White House and how people "mysteriously" died surrounding the issues and how the FBI and U.S. military combined to cover it all up. Remember the asinine magic-bullet official theory of the U.S. government invented by that master of tightrope walking between so-called left and right, now U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member, Arlen Specter (R-Pa.). Think 9/11 cover-up.

      People will remember where they really learned the truth (the whole truth). They'll come back to help bring forth the Christian Commons, which you now hate because its the most unselfish thing anyone out there has even proposed. It's the answer to the food shortages and all the rest of the evil.

      Look, if you don't want people following Mohammed, say so from a position of honesty. Argue from a position of righteousness that is consistency. Don't do this stupid CIA, KGB, Mossad excrement. It's the bottomless pit. You're doing the work of minions and dupes for the worldly imperialist plutocrats. You're selling your souls following them. "Wake up America?"; try waking up yourselves. Try reading Jesus.

      Honestly, if this is the best Satan can do now, he's really lost his touch. Go tell your bosses, "We've been made. The cover is blown."

      Judas infiltrated, but he did God's work while Satan thought he was doing Satan's alone. Read it, and think. Jesus wasn't tricked. Real Christians (the elect) aren't going to fall to this garbage of yours. They will tell each other. They'll be warned. They'll heed.

      You don't know what's going on even if you think you do.

      Where is the 3.2 trillion dollars that is missing and reported as such immediately before 9/11 by Donald Rumsfeld? All the coverage went on to 9/11.

      What's the memory hole?

      Who addicted the poor, U.S. inner-city Blacks to crack cocaine? The CIA did under Oliver North under Ronald Reagan. They used the money to fund the terrorist groups and death squads in Central America and elsewhere. Hear that? I said terrorist groups!

      Who trained SAVAK in torture and terrorist techniques? The CIA did. SAVAK was the secret police of the dictator of Iran, the Shah. If U.S. idiots hadn't overthrown Mohammed Mosaddeq but had rather helped him, Iran wouldn't be ruled now by semi-sharia. Many other things that happened wouldn't have too.

      What you do now creates the future humanity inherits. Are you setting up Hell or Heaven? I'm for being Heaven bound. You're headed for Hell and trying to take as many others with you whom you can fool. You are promoting the devouring spirit, the fracturing spirit, the opposite of the healing, wholesome spirit. You're for coercion and not people freely coming to God. You're advocating evil. You're not working for God. You haven't come in the name of God.

      Your site says things about Mohammed's teaching that are correct. You are pushing half-truths. He did teach wrong things; however, you are being hypocritical because you don't want what is truly best. What Jesus Christ preached is truly best. No one in the history of humanity has ever surpassed his teachings and life example for rightness (or righteousness if you will).

      Why not stop being a hypocrite? Why don't you turn to the truth, repent of all your selfish feelings, thoughts, words, and deeds, and then truly atone to the best of your ability? Why don't you just become a real Christian? Give up all the greed, violence, and sexual depravity. Don't point to the beam in Mohammed's eye while you still have beams in your own. Preach and do consistency with your all, then warn others away from error. Also, don't be coercive, since you wouldn't truly turn via such means either. You have to choose without being forced, or you really won't have it in your heart.

      God bless everyone with the real truth.

      Tom Usher

    • true, i guess

    • @Bryan 3 -

      Why are you unsure?