The pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, flag desecration, American flag lapel pins, and placing and holding one's hand over one's heart during that pledge and the national anthem, where does a real Christian stand on these things that some work so hard to make such huge issues (phony issues, misdirection)?

Many people who put a lot of stock in these things claim also to be Christian. They say that the "Pledge" and supposedly honoring the flag and flag lapel-pins and whether or not one holds his or her hand over his heart during that pledge and during the national anthem are all matters of showing one's national patriotism.

All of this raises many issues such as the following:

  • Divided allegiances
  • Idolatry
  • Shallowness of spirit
  • Doing things to be seen
  • Show and no substance
  • Inconsistency
  • Misunderstanding freedom
  • What is truly sacred
  • Obfuscation
  • Intimidation
  • Resetting agendas to what is shallow
  • Spiritual hypocrisy
  • False solidarity
  • Identification with one's enemies
  • Greed
  • Violence
  • Depravity
  • Lust
  • Worldly imperialism
  • Theft
  • Inequality
  • Consolidation of evil
  • Monopolies
  • Mammon worship
  • Violations of all that is truly sacred
  • False propaganda
  • Psychological operations
  • False exceptionalism, and
  • Supporting war

That list is by no means exhaustive in the particulars, but it represents the summation of the problem. Where is the New Commandment with those who hold with the pledge, the national flag, lapel pins, where and when one holds his or her hand over his or her heart, and national anthems?

The New Commandment is the highest calling of the Christian. It calls for consistency. It calls for the single vision Jesus preached about in his Sermon on the Mount.

The light of the body is the eye: therefore when thine eye is single, thy whole body also is full of light; but when thine eye is evil, thy body also is full of darkness. Luke 11:34.

Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. Matthew 6:21.

A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. Matthew 12:35.

For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes. Luke 6:44.

Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. Matthew 7:17.

Now, to understand Jesus and his teachings and deeds is to understand consistency (the absence of hypocrisy). Do those who put great stock in what they consider the supposed patriotic symbols mentioned above bring forth light or darkness, good things or evil, good figs and grapes or thorns and bramble bushes? Are they corrupt or good?

Well, we hear the same ones who illegally spied on people, who illegally authorized torture, who advocated the theft of another nations oil, who illegally invaded other lands murdering even tens of thousands of innocent children, who stole elections, who bore and bear false witness against others, who fight against good stewardship of the house (the whole planet and society, which have been inextricable), who kill and murder and assassinate and maim, and who move the people to accept sexual harm and war, all clamoring about all this so-called patriotic symbolism. They are the biggest hypocrites on the planet.

Jesus preached against exactly what these hypocrites and liars stand for and do. The same kind of liars and hypocrites murdered Jesus for saying what he did and doing what he did.

Not one of them is a real Christian. Not one of them is really even trying to be. They are phonies. All real Christians and those who are really trying to be Christian will not stand with these blatantly corrupt people.

Real Christians and those who want to be will do everything they can to be consistent, and that means being consistent with everything Jesus said and did. He did nothing and said nothing that has been recorded concerning his ministry that closed the door on consistency all the way from here to perfection. No one else did that before he did — not the one they call the Buddha, not the one they call Krishna, not Abraham or Moses or Elijah, or anyone else. Mohammed didn't do it afterwards either. Mohammed wasn't a Christian. He wasn't a follower of Jesus Christ. Anyone who doubts that isn't thinking clearly.

Karl Rove is not a Christian. Sean Hannity is not a Christian. Rupert Murdoch is not a Christian. There is no such thing as a so-called conservative, Republican Christian. Anyone who wants to be a Christian must not follow any of them or take his or her cues from them or anyone who is in agreement with them in their antichrist positions.

Christians are those who do what Jesus said to the best of their abilities. Anyone who doesn't isn't a Christian. Rove, Hannity, Murdoch, and others could easily change from their self-centered, deceptive practices if they were trying to be Christian.

That's the way it is. It's the truth, the whole truth.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.