Sometimes you have to wonder what country we're living in. Reading Christy's post on tent cities and food rationing, contemplating a trillion dollar war and $4 a gallon gas, you just want to shake your head and wonder how the hell things could slide down so far so fast.
On the political side we see that the usual checks and balances on a power-mad executive have been damaged: Congress, what's left of the judiciary, the Mask Media, and intimidated whistleblowers.
And on the economic side, you can imagine where this is going, the same prosperity-loving administration — and by prosperity-loving, I mean for the insiders, not the little people out there — has removed most of the checks and balances from the financial world as well.
Calculated Risk heaps scorn on the regulatory incompetence:
Shocked? Homebuyers were speculating with no money down. Mortgage brokers didn't care because they would sell the loans immediately and collect their fees. Wall Street didn't care because they could package the loans and sell them to investors.
Investors would have cared, except they trusted the rating agencies.
[snip] ...the rating agencies weren't evaluating the underlying loans - they were performing statistical analysis using models based on lenders that cared if the borrower would repay the loan.
At the same time, regulators - despite numerous warnings - mostly ignored the problem, apparently for ideological reasons ("let the free market work"). What a mess. [bold added]
Ian Welsh has given us an overview of the mortgage crisis and proposals for how to unwind this tangled mess. Kevin Phillips joined us last week for Book Salon to discuss how the government systematically removed all the guardrails from the financial markets.
Blame where blame is due: the repeal of Glass-Steagall ripped down the firewall between banks and non-regulated financial firms during the Clinton administration. Then the Bush-Cheney administration finally found something where they were competent: tearing down all the remaining regulations keeping investment firms from going bonkers with the nation's savings.
So, whee! Anybody can start an investment firm, buy a bank, and have the bank invest in their
gambling habit stock manipulation great ideas. I mean, what could go wrong?
Do you have a bank account, a pension plan, a mortgage? You could be in trouble without knowing it. Your bank account is probably not FDIC insured, ever check the fine print about that "new kind of account" that they switched you over to, to get more interest? Your mortgage, if taken out recently, might have a clause that allows the monthly payments to double or triple.
If you try to sell your house, you are caught in a market where housing prices are falling [of course, this is good news for people trying to buy houses, silver lining]. People who were counting on selling their homes to get retirement funds are about to get some sad news: home prices are likely to plummet in the next year, and will not recover for several more years.
Millions of people are already "underwater" where the value of the house is less than the money still owed on the mortgage and home equity loans. Millions more will be there soon.
If you have an IRA, company pension plan, or life insurance, or live in a city or state with pension investments, you will be affected by a different kind of crisis in the mortgage market. There have been so many weird kinds of investment vehicles based on
fairy tales unfounded assumptions about how much various kinds of mortgages are worth, that no one really knows the value of them.
The tricky part is that financial firms have traded so many of these complicated financial products back and forth with each other that this is where we are now:
Everybody owes everybody else like a giant web of spidersilk. And what holds it together? Housing prices, which are collapsing.
We are beginning to see banks and investment firms write off billions of dollars in losses every quarter, and this will continue for many months.are in for a world of hurt.
The great unwinding will be painful as shaky investments are settled for pennies on the dollar. The good news is, we'll become poorer only gradually if this process happens slowly. But what if the whole thing starts falling apart all at once?
It's a house of cards. And the wind is blowing.
RLCC Comment: I have had many laissez-faire capitalists come to this site to defend capitalism. It's tapered off though. One doesn't have to wonder why. The fruits of their system that is based upon selfishness is coming full circle to bite them.
It wasn't that long ago that one was pleading with me that there are no soup lines in America. A few days later, the news had a featured story about how the soup lines in America don't have enough soup. They run out regularly before hungry people trampled down by cutthroat competition get anything to eat.
I wrote long ago that Hoovervilles were going to start showing up, and so they have and not just in New Orleans. It's just the tip of the iceberg.
We must create the Christian Commons all over the place. It's the only way.
I had another one comment about how capitalism is the spirit of unselfishness. These people are exactly the ones Isaiah was talking about when he said they put bitter for sweet.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)