Who is being so dumb as to think that U.S. foreign policy doesn't precipitate people seeing Americans as ugly and calling "Yankee Go Home!"? The Ugly American and "Yankee Go Home" are long standing views that hundreds of millions and even billions of people have had at one time or another directly on account of US foreign policy.

What is all of this stupidity of being offended that Jeremiah Wright has simply stated the obvious?

The neocons want their cake and to eat it too. On one hand, they say Osama bin Laden did the 9/11 attacks. When one asks bin Laden why he attacks US interests, he has a clearly expressed list of grievances against US foreign policy and practices. On the other hand, the neocons want to say that the attacks were not on account of those grievances.

Well look, what do these neocons want people to believe, that the US was simply minding its own business? Sure it was minding its business. Its business is military Empire encircling the globe with some 700 bases in some 130 countries ramming Americanization (plutocratic-capitalism) down everyone's throat.

Look, al Qaeda didn't think up 9/11 on its own at best. Agent provocateurs are used to infiltrate and then to encourage wrong-doing. It happens all the time.

All sorts of interests were glad it happened within the US and Israel. They were glad, because it was the "new Pearl Harbor" pretext. There were scenes shown on TV of people in Arab areas dancing, but what about the Israelis who were laughing, clapping, and dancing right in the US in view of the dust and smoke rising from ground zero? They were highly trained Israeli spies who were let go by the Bush Administration. Those spies had been following the "terrorist attackers" around for months. What about the people in the White House and Pentagon and Israel who were furious with Admiral Fallon when (it has been reported) he ordered that no shots be fired at Iran's speed boats? Fallon was "retired."

Machiavellians are running America. That's a fact.

They are lying about what they do or don't know about Iran. They are saying things as if they know them that they absolutely don't know. They are saying those things simply to drum up support. It is the Big Lie. They lied concerning 9/11. They lied concerning Afghanistan. They lied on a massive scale concerning Iraq even in the face of huge opposition. They did a major cover-up of their duplicity in 9/11. They were never focused on Afghanistan. All the things they said, and are still saying, about Iraq were, and remain, lies. Everybody knows it. Yet, they are still in office thanks to spineless, deal-making, people in the US federal legislature with dirt to keep hidden and much to gain by letting Bush continue doing the Empire's dirty work. They haven't been impeached and removed. Now they are lying about very nearly the exact same list of nations they had when they defrauded their way into office.

They don't have the troops to put on the ground after bombings, so all they can do if they attack is bomb on a much larger and more intensive and destructive scale than they used against Baghdad. They'll just move to man-less warfare they've been working up to for decades. They want to fight their wars via video game controllers thousands of miles away and then turn it over to the computers and robots. They want to roll out their newer generation of weapons. Watch. It's coming.

I'll tell you where all this is going to lead if they attack Iran: Another Cold War and Arms Race but with the US in a substantially weakened position with an extremely weakened dollar no longer the world's reserve currency.

The neocons have been planting the seeds of the destruction of the American Empire.

I said it before, and I'll say it again here right now. If the US attacks Iran based upon the same type of garbage (lies, lies, lies) that they used to attack Iraq, the US will go to Hell. How could it escape? It knows better. The leaders have been told.

The same people (type; kind; spirit) who sat around the table authorizing torture are trying to drum up yet another war without any cause but their own greed, blood lust, and no doubt sexual depravity.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.