In 1946, the King David hotel was bombed by Menachem Begin's Irgun group. 92 were killed, among them civilians and nurses. Last July, former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu attended the 60th anniversary celebrating the terrorist attack, prompting the British Ambassador in Tel Aviv to complain, "We do not think that it is right for an act of terrorism, which led to the loss of many lives, to be commemorated." Netanyahu explained this was not terrorism because Begin telephoned a 15-minute warning – what moral ambiguity? [That's putting it mildly. Netanyahu is obviously monstrous.]

Albert Einstein, with 23 Jewish intellectuals, wrote the New York Times on December 4th, 1948 stating,

Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence ... of the 'Freedom Party' (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties - formed out of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine. The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated - It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughout the world, if correctly informed - could add their names and support to the movement he represents - from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future - the Arab village of Deir Yassin - had taken no part in the war - terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village - killed most of its inhabitants - and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem - the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre - Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear - the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism - and misrepresentation are means, and a 'Leader State' is the goal - it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known ...

Despite Begin's history of terrorism, his attacks on the King David Hotel, and the Dar Yassin massacre, he took office as Prime Minister, 1977.

In 1944, the terrorist group Lehi led by Yitzhak Shamir assassinated Lord Moyne, British Minister Representative. Shamir was sought after for capital punishment, but escaped capture. 1948, Shamir ordered assassination of Count Folke Bernadotte of Sweden (who secured release of 21,000 Jews from German camps in World War II) while he sought to bring peace to the Middle East as the regional UN representative. State terrorism was again established as an Israeli cornerstone when Shamir took office as Prime Minister in 1983.

1953, Ariel Sharon as the leader of Special Forces Unit 101 ordered the Qibya operation, in which 69 civilians were killed. Sharon's act was condemned by many countries, including the U.S.

As Defense Minister in 1982, Sharon was held entirely responsible for the Sabra and Shatila massacre in which 3,500 civilians were murdered. The Kahan Commission, established by the Israeli government for 'Inquiry into the Events at the Refugee Camps in Beirut' personally charged Sharon for the massacre and recommended his discharge, stating, "We have found, as has been detailed in this report, that the Minister of Defense [Ariel Sharon] bears personal responsibility. In our opinion, it is fitting that the Minister of Defense draw the appropriate personal conclusions arising out of the defects revealed with regard to the manner in which he discharged the duties of his office and that the Prime Minister consider whether he should exercise his authority under Basic Law according to which 'the Prime Minister may, after informing the Cabinet of his intention to do so, remove a minister from office.'"

Nevertheless, Sharon went on to become the 11th Israeli Prime Minister. Interestingly, the same American President who found Ariel Sharon "a man of peace" found an association between Islam with fascism. One can only speculate which Israeli officials acting in the war against Lebanon and described by U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights (Louise Arbour) as "in a position of command and control" bearing "personal criminal responsibility" will emerge as a Prime Minister and "a man of peace" in the near future – terrorists yesterday, Prime Ministers today.

Moshe Dayan, responsible for the occupied territories as IDF fourth Chief of Staff (1953-1958), described to his Cabinet the plan for Palestinians under occupation, "We have no solution, you shall continue to live like dogs, and whoever wishes may leave, and we will see where this process leads."

Source: "Terrorists yesterday, Prime Ministers today," by Aly Mohamed. Arabisto. March 13, 2007.

I've written all of this myself before. It's all documented on this website. In the face of this evidence that political Zionism is a farce, the U.S. goes ahead supporting what has always been an illegitimate operation.

Of course the Jewish people are not to be coerced. Of course people calling themselves Christians were wrong to do to Jews what Jews had done to Christians from the beginning of Jesus's Church (persecute).

The whole world must turn and repent of evil or die.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • You might be interested on the "Sins of the fathers" in the Bush family. Prescott Bush and his father-in-law George Herbert Walker were running the slave coal mines that needed Jewish and other camp laborers in Poland. Bush continued his business transactions with Fritz "I Paid Hitler -author" Thyssen even after US had been in war with the Nazi Germany already for a year.

      I think GW Bush was repenting over the sins of his fathers during his era. But "Thou Shall Not Take the Name of the Lord in Vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless whosoever uses His name in vain", said the decalog, Ten Commandments to the hypocrite fake believers. Not to your own ends. I pray for the Republican quasi-royal families, I wish them all good. An analogous process of blood money laundring was going on in the richest family of the "impartial" Sweden, the Wallenberg's. They invested in the Nazi's during the hyperinflation at the 1920's, when money from abroad determined who's gonna get the power. SA was a private and PAID army with its 350,000 x2 arms. They were no boy scouts but demanded money. Four times larger private army than the Wehrmacht field army of Germany!

      A longer version in English with Scientific backround of Western race hygiene in general (first a scanned text from a classic volume of professor Daniel Gasman, then my own 50 page research with 100 references):

      Recovering from hemorrhage in the left hemisphere of the brain,, evolutionary critic

      Helsinki, Finland

      Biochemist, drop-out (MSci-Master of Sciing)

    • Hello Pauli Ojala,

      I've written about Thyssen and the Bush family:



      I don't have the time right now to read all your linked material, but I will leave your comment and links for others to visit. When I have enough time, I'll try to remember to take a look.

      God bless,

      Tom Usher

    • Thanks. I'll digest your articles. I'm at the sick leave now, thankful that I am recovering from brain hemorrhage. (I'm at the age of 33 and 7 months and they call this the best age of man, in which both Alexander the Great and Jesus the Greatest died...)

      I should emphasize, despite my critique of the Bush family, that as a bioscientist I confess (and genuinely think) that G(eorge) H(erbert)'s veto in bioethics not to use federal money for embryonic stem cells but to adult and placenta stem cells is the number one singularity in the modern bioethics. It is the only brave act in the field of bioethics, really.

      The White House Paper was signed just 2 days before September 11th in 2001 and can be compared to the United Kingdom which made a law accepting human fertilization for mere research purposes, English embryonic tissue bank, creation of human-nonhuman embryo chimerahybrid to yield stem cells. Such opportunism. It has come up in 2007 also as a realistic alternative scientifically and medically when it turned out that by transfecting patients own skin cells with 3-4 growth factors (transcription factors), those can be turned even to totipotent stem cells after short cultivation on plate. Also, bone marrow blood transfusion has been in the clinic now for 40 years but the liberal press has not discussed that as a stem cell technique although that is the case.

      I am scared that in the blogosphere at least the American Jews are being made as a scape goat in the spirit of 1920's Germany. If those vulgar tones will spread, it will be terrible. Already now in China, the media is absurd in its cursing the Jews for US policies. Here's my remedy for it as tables, charts and statistics:



    • Hello Pauli Ojala,

      I'm sorry to hear that you had a brain hemorrhage, but it's good that you say you are recovering.

      You termed Jesus "the Greatest," and you said he died. If you think Jesus is the greatest, it would put you at odds with the Talmudists. Do you believe what Jesus said about himself? If you believe it, then you know he's alive now.

      My faith is not in science as people have come to use the term. I really believe in what Jesus said about faith. Testing shuts things down that otherwise would happen. It closes doors.

      I'm not favorably impressed by either G. H. W. Bush or G. W. Bush. Every move they make is for the selfish gain of their clan or individually. They aren't very bright.

      As for the pro-abortionists, they don't want alternatives to embryos because they want the value of embryos diminished in the public mind. They want the public to be not only tolerant but condoning of various selfish behaviors. Pitting embryos against research into curing diseases works to put people into a false position of thinking they have to choose between the two. Frankly, the right path is neither. The world only finds itself in its current mess because of evil (selfishness). Jesus showed the way out of it, but people cling to falsehoods.

      As for American Jews being scapegoated, the Zionists Project should never have happened. It was a secular-humanist error. It will fail. The Jewish people are being confronted by a real moral crisis that the Zionists thought they could fake their way through. It didn't work.

      It cannot be denied that the vast majority of neocons are Jews and that the neocons drove the George W. Bush administrations policies and practices. His administration is an abomination; hence those neocon Jews (and non-Jew neocons) are hugely responsible and will be held to account.

      The most important thing for you to realize is that all Jews are not being lumped together. Those days are over. Jews who are standing up to the neocons and Likudniks are being lauded. I'm not saying that I agree with every position of every Jew who stands up to them, but I do say that standing up to them (peacefully) is right.

      When I get more time, I'll look into your material. I have been working on housekeeping on this website. I also have to make a disgusting income under capitalism.

      May I ask did you suffer a stroke?

      God saves. God heals.


    • Hi there,

      I did not suffer a stroke (ischemia-reperfusion), but got a 'bang' in the head and my brain membrane (dura) was broken/ruptured. Luckily, it was not SAV loss of both membranes which would kill half of its victims.

      It would be nice, indeed, if you could find some factual errors in those links, comrad!

      Regarding the person of Jesus, this is the main tract that I have composed and I am delivering to post boxes with my autistic son:

      It is mainly in Finnish, but the last lines are in English and are rather explicit in where me and my household stand.

      Apple of the eye. People are provoking G*d, really.



    • Hello Pauli Ojala,

      Actually, an ischemic stroke is a blockage (cutting off oxygen). It's not the same thing as a hemorrhagic stroke {rupture(s)}.

      You linked to a Word doc, which (Word docs) I've blocked for security reasons. Do you have another format or have it available online?

      As for your earlier comments, I haven't forgotten. I'm already multitasking, so to speak. I'll get there yet. However, I can't say I'll be able to fact-check you. I'll be able to speak to the theological aspects from a Christian standpoint though.

      God bless,


    • Hello Again Pauli Ojala,

      Well, I read your linked materials. It agrees with much of what I've written on this site. Thank you for emphasizing Ernst Haeckel and his influence on Nazism. Of course, you are correct that the Bush family has deep roots in eugenics. George H. W. Bush even openly advocated it while he was in the U.S. House of Representatives.

      I too have written about the Nazis, although not from the "scientific" approach.


      As for your concern that people could slid backwards into thinking that there is something genetically wrong with Jews such that they are incapable of higher morals, the strongest defense against that is for the Jews to hold to the highest moral standard. Unfortunately, there are plenty of twisted neocons giving Jews a bad name and reputation. Fortunately, there are plenty of Jews who are developing the backbone to stand up to them and to denounce the evil.

      I absolutely do not believe that Jesus was an Aryan. His father was not a Roman soldier. Jesus was a Jew. That doesn't work well for the anti-Semites. Jesus was a Semite and a great human being: The greatest.

      As for the holocaust industry, I do believe that there are unethical Jews who milk sympathy to fleece others.

      As for the Nazis, what they did was both a crime against humanity and a crime against the Jewish people.

      You quote Stephen Jay Gould a great deal. Of course, you must be aware that he was no Christian. He was a materialist all the way. I'm not a fan.

      As for science, per se, it's a misnomer to apply the term "science," which means knowledge, to the method of experimentation that goes by the expression "the scientific method." I don't hold with Karl Popper. In his world view, everything is reducible to probability. However, in my knowledge, God knows there are no odds.

      I agree with Hegel more than Marx concerning mind, matter, and metaphysics. I repeatedly state on this website that spirit is over matter. We did not come out from nothing. God is before (I don't mean that in mundane chronological terms) matter.

      Concerning Darwinism, I don't doubt DNA and mutations and genetics. However, there is much, much more to everything than the arrogant scientists claim to have discovered. They haven't even scratched the surface, as another two thousand years of existing on this plane will end up attesting.

      I don't hold at all with Nietzsche's brand of humanism either. He just couldn't grasp and hold onto the thought of God. To him, God let him down when his pastor father died when he was a boy. That's shortsighted on Nietzsche's part.

      I like what you wrote as follows:

      ...the Judaeo-Christian ideal of agapee that I desire. The latter sees free giving, altruism, benevolence and self-sacrificing love as the beginning, motivation, and sustainer of reality.

      However, contrary to what many people forward, I don't hold that agape is unconditional all the time. I believe that there are different loves for different levels even while there is an ultimate and absolute love. Jesus spoke in both absolute and relative terms. Understanding that is required for understanding real Christianity. Also, I don't believe in selflessness but rather unselfishness. I say that because I know "the self" is God and I have great concern for God.

      So, tell me. Do you hold with some level of "scientific creationism"?

      I definitely believe in a theistic evolution on my own terms. I won't be lumped in with everyone else who claims the same thing though. Labels don't do enough justice because people limit others too much that way. Afterall, most people who call themselves Christian don't have the faintest idea of what they're talking about.

      Have you read, "ABOUT OUR NAME: REAL LIBERAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH"? It explains the Church.

      Also, are you a direct descendant of Jacob? If so, are you a member of Jews for Jesus? Please share more of your vision of Christianity.

      Since I asked you your ethnic background, let me say that I'm an Anglo-Saxon for the most part. I have a little Scottish in me by way of Northern Ireland from my maternal grandmother: Watt.

      God bless all,

      Tom Usher

    • Hello Pauli Ojala,

      No comment?