George W. Bush recently said the following:
So our position, my government's position, is to support the Siniora government, is to beef up his army, so that he can have a chance to respond to the people who are acting outside the confines of government. And, you know, Hezbollah would be nothing without Iranian support, and Iranians are the crux of many of the problems in the Middle East, whether it be funding of Hezbollah, funding of Hamas, or obviously actions within the young democracy of Iraq. So a lot of my trip is going to be to get people to focus not only on Lebanon, remember Lebanon, but also remember that Iran causes a lot of the problems.
Who "causes a lot of the problems"? First of all, problems with what, with being anti-Bush, anti-neocon, anti-worldly Empire, anti-neoliberal-economics, anti-foreign invasion and occupation, anti-oil theft, and anti-land theft?
George W. Bush is just sucking up to false-Zionists for the sake of Republican financial dealings. Of course, he burns the candle at both ends by being a great friend of the Saudis who back Wahhabism and fund the Sunni fighters in Iraq against the Shiites. You don't ever hear him going after the Saudis even when the Saudis do huge illegal arms deals with the British, among other crimes. That's because they have billions and do private deals with Bush's family and inner circle of friends.
George W. Bush also said the following:
They know that the Iraqi government, along with the US government, wants them to stop sending their weapons from Iran into Iraq, all aiming to kill innocent people. That's what they're doing. They're being very—you know, they're not being constructive at all. But they absolutely know our position, and when we catch them doing it, they'll be brought to justice, and we are catching them doing it right now.
"... and we are catching them doing it right now." You mean you are busily coming up with some fabricated evidence. How can anyone ever believe this pathological liar?
Frankly, it doesn't even matter if Iran is funding Hezbollah or Hamas or Shiite resistance fighters in Iraq in terms of what Bush thinks ought to be done about any of it. That's because Bush had no business invading Iraq and the U.S. and other powers had no business giving other people's land away to European Jews, as much as one rightfully feels for the plight of the Jews especially surrounding the events of WWII.
As the old saying goes, though, "Two wrongs don't make a right." Taking away the homes and lands of people in Palestine without even full economic compensation and help and assistance with proper resettling didn't make anything right. It was a wrong on top of a wrong. If those people didn't want to move under any circumstances, no one had the right to force them out. The powers don't have imminent domain over the Earth. They are just self-authorized (arrogant), and will fall. They aren't powers established by God but rather by the enemies of God.
As for Iran and Hezbollah and Hamas and the Shiite resistance fighters in Iraq, they all have legitimate grievances with the U.S. and other powers and with Israel. Those legitimate grievances ought properly to be redressed. Unless and until they are, which means negotiating peace in earnest with an eye to making all parties whole, the region and the whole world will continue becoming more and more unsettled. There may be ups and downs in areas, but the general direction will continue unabatedly down.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)