ARE POLITICAL ZIONISM AND CHRISTIAN-ZIONISM BETTER THAN ISLAM?

05/16/08, 9:39 AM
The Language of Hizbullah
by Elias Bejjani
Hizbullah's Iranian mission has never been secret.

The recent bloody terrorist riots that Hizbullah inflicted on Lebanon and its peaceful people starting last Wednesday tragically show that Lebanon today is confronting challenges of a magnitude unseen since the end of its civil war in 1990.

That opinion piece prattles on without once mentioning that the Zionists stole the land they're on via terrorist tactics and force of arms.

You know, if militancy and taking other people's land is okay then why should anyone choose the Judaism of the so-called political Zionists or the so called Christian-Zionists of John Hagee over the Islam of Ayatollah Khomeini? Actually, the Islam of the Ayatollah has some things going for it that neither the said "political Zionists" or "Christian-Zionists" have going for them. The Sharia prohibition on Jewish-style usury is actually better.

Also, if you're going to go ahead and be selfish as a male, you may as well agree with having several wives who must keep only unto you or be killed.

Of course, I don't hold with that notion of marriage or with militarism or coercion or usury or even commerce as practiced under Sharia. None of that is good enough.

Still, if I were offered to live only in either Tel Aviv (with its obvious sins on display) or living in Tehran, barring an attack on either by anyone, I should choose Tehran.

Many self-styled Christians might find that shocking and quickly remind me of the religious persecution in Tehran. I would remind them that Christian proselytizing in Tel Aviv will land one in prison.

Frankly, the Iranians allow the Jews in Iran to practice Judaism, because Jews aren't much on proselytizing except for promoting that said political Zionism via neocons about the globe.

Of course, I'd land in prison or dead or both in either case, because I won't not proselytize for the message and exemplary life of Jesus Christ.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • Connie

      "ARE POLITICAL ZIONISM AND CHRISTIAN-ZIONISM BETTER THAN ISLAM?"

      In a word. Yes.

    • Hello Connie,

      Where's the foundation for your belief?

      Do you object to violence?

      Do you support the Zionist project that used terrorism and murder to steal land and homes and split up communities and destroy hundreds of previously peaceful villages?

      Do you not believe in the commandment not to be covetous?

      You don't have the love of truth and the law of God written in your heart yet.

      The Zionist project will fail because it was started by atheists and haters of Jesus.

      May God bless you with the light that comes forth from the words and deeds of Jesus Christ.

      Tom Usher