Most Chinese Say They Approve of Government Internet Control [and here]

3/26/2008 | Report | Deborah Fallows

Many Americans assume that China's internet users are unhappy about their government's control of the internet, but a new survey finds most Chinese say they approve of internet regulation, especially by the government.

Putting ideas in people's heads that then tempt them to fall into doing that which is harmful to others and to themselves (the two always go together due to the ripple effect) is the proverbial fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

The terms "knowledge," "good," and "evil" are semantically understood here. They are contextually understood. That's a huge subject in itself. In fact, the subject touches upon everything when exhausted.

The Chinese people in the PRC (People's Republic of China) by and large are convinced that it is wise to be insulated by a vanguard who it is hoped won't abuse their position.

This issue of ceding control is alive in the U.S., because many in the U.S. have been raised on stories of historical events laying out that the more consolidated power becomes in the hands of a few or one, the more harm has resulted, not because every group and every individual is equally corrupt, but because sooner or later (usually sooner), the corrupted and corruptible weasel there way into authority and severely abuse it.

This doesn't just concern what is considered political office but also those who bring forth via commerce. This is also why America was founded on the experiment of checks and balances and why people in public office were set up to further set the limits of commerce. Unfortunately, checks and balances still function on mutual agreement.

We've seen quite clearly that George W. Bush and his kind (and they are a kind apart) agree in public; however, in private, they deride the suckers (those who trust them or the system). The U.S. Constitution is "just a God damn piece of paper," George W. Bush is reported to have said before several credible witnesses.

Well, it is a God damn piece of paper relative to the New Commandment; however, that's not the point. The point is that George W. Bush and his kind literally do sucker people with it. Real Christians won't do that. Also, real Christians know that the U.S. Constitution is a document of partial-truths the true sentiments of which ought not to be discarded but rather fulfilled, as Jesus fulfilled the Mosaic law by taking its spirit in the righteous direction to the ultimate logical conclusion (divine).

George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld (who very much still has the ear of Bush and Cheney), et al., on the other hand, take the parts that are false in spirit and build upon those in the false direction to the wholly illogical end that is death in terms of which Jesus spoke.

What of the Chinese? The censorship by the Communist Party (CCP) (never truly communist in the way Jesus was truly communist) keeps the people from learning Jesus's way. Unfortunately for all of them, that means they don't live in any of the truth (real truth).

The reason the CCP and the Neocons and others ignore and censor with all their might the real message of Jesus (giving and sharing all, pacifism, sexual purity, serving as the last — making the server first) is because that message overturns everything for which the CCP and Neocons stand to varying degrees in their mixed bag (greed, selfishness, violence, coercion, elitism, being served rather than serving as the least, sexual license, lying, etc.).

Is it wrong to censor? No, of course it isn't. It is required of one that he or she self censor. Clean house, but then don't ever let the evil spirit back in. If it gets in, clean it out again and again and again, forever.

It is important to understand the power of temptation (that which ought not to be manifested) especially upon the young. This is not to cover evil. Evil must still be rooted out to be prevented.

At the same time, it is important that the people not have heathens as their shepherds, as Jesus viewed heathenism. Heathens are incapable of knowing. They will invariably lead into temptation and further falling.

So, whom do you then trust? You trust those who preach and do giving and sharing, pacifism, and sexual purity both publicly and privately with all their mind, body, soul, and strength. You trust those who do their utmost to live up to the New Commandment in all that is implied by Jesus's words and deeds together. You trust the community of true believers in all of this who strive mightily to do it. They are not heathens.

How do you ensure this system? You do it by doing exactly what Jesus said to do:

16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.

17 And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.

18 Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. — Jesus Christ; Matthew 18:16-18 (KJV)

If you don't believe in temptation, in the power of evil put in people's faces over and over, just make a concerted effort to be aware. Watch what exposure does, especially concerning the behavior of children. Look for the cause and effect. Watch for the consequences. When behavior turns unruly (selfish, violent, depraved), including your own, retrace steps to the sources of the unruliness. It may take digging into hidden behaviors, but you can be absolutely certain it is there. If you can't pinpoint it, it definitely doesn't ever mean it isn't there. It's just eluding you.

In the vernacular, this process is called "connecting the dots." The saying "follow the money" is part of this process of discernment. Follow the lust might be more helpful. Follow the selfishness will definitely work.

What are we to do when we find the source? Well, do what Jesus said to do. Point out hypocrisy and selfishness and call for the removal of hypocritical behavior. Call for unselfish behavior (the absence of hypocrisy). Call only for what is always beneficent and therefore never harmful.

It is this set of principles that is not being taught or being put to the fore. Evil seeks to quash these principles. It is up to you acting individually and in concert with us to bind evil and loose righteousness on Earth.

If you read this and turn your back rather than help now, how will you escape damnation?


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.