...pole-dancing kits sold in the toy section to "Hooters Girl (in training)" T-shirts for toddlers to padded bras for 6-year-olds.
By Katharine Mieszkowski
May. 20, 2008
The linked article is hugely off the mark. You have to be sick to make and/or market such stuff. Little kids need to be allowed to be just that, little kids. The last thing they need are sexual advances or abuse. They aren't sexual thinkers until someone older introduces it prematurely. Kids can get it from other kids, but it always comes in from older people who are often up to no good. If it weren't for the predators and other adults feeling the need to "warn" or "prepare" kids to watch out, kids could grow up without all the sexual garbage.
The article is opposed to censorship, but that's referring to the state. Any household and any business can cleans itself of all of the garbage. No house or company is under any obligation to have garbage within it. No one is obligated to purchase from companies that facilitate such garbage either.
The settings for totally unfiltered Google search results are wideopen for any kid to change. I checked it. With the filter off, it's shocking what comes through. Even with the setting as strict as possible (there are only three levels), some very explicit results get through.
Why is Google making money that way? Why do they have that stuff on the shelf for sale and for free? Think about it!
All the premature sex revs up lusting of all kinds long before a person is emotional mature enough to choose to ward it off. Being older doesn't make it alright either.
Where's the wholesomeness that used to be so sought after? Where's the consistency? Where's the giving and sharing economy, the real peace (that doesn't have war on the table), and sexual wholesomeness all rolled into one?