The fastest way to stop terrorism is by being good to people, only the evil, greedy, violent, depraved ones don't want Americans and others realizing that. They want to get people to falsely imagine that being good to one's supposed enemies is childish in some sort of naive, gullible, sense. Frankly, it is the greedy, violent, depraved ones who need to grow up.

Jesus said that the proper way to approach God is as a little child. What it means is not as a stiff-necked overlord. That's why Jesus said that we are to move beyond (outgrow) lording it over one another and on to being each other's servants and nothing but.

George W. Bush though said the following last Thursday:

Success in Iraq would deal a devastating blow to Iran's ambitions to dominate the region. Success in Iraq would show the people of the Middle East that democracy and freedom can flourish in their midst. And success in Iraq will send a signal to the world that America does not withdraw, does not retreat, does not back down in the face of terror, and that will make us safer here in the United States of America.

Does that match with the Christian message of Jesus? No, it doesn't match it at all. In fact, it's the exact opposite. Therefore, Bush is preaching the antichrist message. There's no doubt about it.

Let anyone who agrees say so openly in a comment. Stop being silent. Speak up here and now for what's right.

"America does not withdraw, does not retreat, does not back down in the face of terror...." Well, America really needs an investigation into George W. Bush's direct role in 9/11.

He knew about the U.S. so-called intelligence community's and Pentagon's war games planned for that very day in New York City and elsewhere calling for planes to fly into buildings, yet all of his cabinet members and he have always denied that anyone could have even imagined that planes might be used to fly into buildings. They and he are blatant liars caught red handed.

If there is not a new, thorough, investigation that addresses the issues raised by the 9/11 Truth Movement, the U.S. is surely a lawless nation. It is a nation of men and not laws (mundane or divine).

It certainly isn't a democracy, since the vast majority of informed people have wanted a proper investigation all along. It certainly isn't free, since it's being lorded over by those who cheat to get elected. It is enslaved under a plutocracy (those rich in mammon but not Holiness control the government). The rich don't allow the people to hear the facts about 9/11. The rich control the means of mass communication. They control the time of the people too. They also control their educations.

As for withdrawing, retreating, and backing down, those are the things the American people should not do when it comes to seeking and telling the truth. Unfortunately, that's exactly what happens.

The self-styled tough guys itch for a fight and lust after death and destruction but only as dupes and minions of blatant liars. How strong is that? It's weak. It's weak-minded. Why don't they toughen up for truth? When it comes to truth-seeking and truth-telling, they turn chicken.

Who has shown more courage, Jesus when he went to the cross as a total pacifist and for righteousness' sake (truth) or the most gung ho U.S. Marine who ever walked the Earth? The answer is easy. Jesus showed more courage by far. Think about it.

The occupation of Iraq must end, because it was illegal and immoral for the U.S. ever to have invaded. The U.S. invaded, the neocons invaded, to control the oil, to prevent any other would-be empire from getting hold of it. It's all about greed (lust). It's also against environmentalism. It will increase the problem of violent climate change.

Rather than beating up on Iran, try being nice. They are human beings. The only reason why they are at "hardline" now is because of the hardline that has been used against them. After all, it was the U.S. that overthrew their duly elected president and set up the Shah as dictator and the SAVAK secret police as CIA-trained torture experts.

It was ugly of the U.S. It was greedy of the U.S. It was about getting at the Iranian oil for the sake of those who owned the largest shares of, and ran, the U.S. oil corporations that moved in to takeover much of what the British had once dominated.

Rather than being evil, the U.S. needs to focus on alternative, clean, and free energy that won't reduce natural food and that it will share with the world. The whole Middle East and world would dramatically change for the better.

The only people who are against this are selfish-hearted. They don't get into Heaven.

As for the political (false-hearted) Zionists and so-called Christian-Zionists using the Old Testament rationale for taking over and expanding Israel into an Empire, it must be remembered that the God of the Old Testament said expressly through Moses that the only reason the land was being given to the Jews (the Jews were being allowed to take over by completely exterminating many nations) was because of the wickedness of those nations and not because of the righteousness of the Hebrews. God pointed out that the Hebrews had not been righteous but rather stiff-necked. Moses also prophesied the destruction of the state of Israel and the scattering of the people throughout the nations, which happened.

Those nations, according to Moses, were burning their own children in sacrifices to their evil gods. They were practicing adultery, fornication, transvestitism, sodomy, bestiality, all manner of incest, and other confused, misguided, loathsome, and harmful acts. Whether or not one believes that those people were doing those things on a society-wide scale as suggested, the point still stands that by Old Testament biblical standards, the Jews would not have been sanctioned to take the land from nations not engaged in those acts.

Are the Zionists claiming that Iran is on a par with the nations the Jews reportedly exterminated under Moses and Joshua? We've heard no such reports. In fact, it is our understanding that Israel is much more decadent than Tehran. Granted, Iran allows Islamic polygamy, but it appears to stand foursquare against adultery, fornication, transvestitism, sodomy, bestiality, and all manner of incest. Israel cannot say the same thing, far from it.

This is not a call for coercion, but for speaking truth.

Furthermore, Moses said God would support a return to the land only if the Jews practiced righteousness at least up to the level of the Torah. They aren't doing that at all. In fact, the Zionists founder, Theodor Herzl, was an atheist. He was not interested in the theocracy of Moses but in a secular state.

I'm not calling for the theocracy envisioned by Moses. I'm calling for what Jesus revealed, which is far better than what Moses showed.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.