The problem is that the people running things are dumb. It is stupid to be immoral and amoral. They've come to power via brute force. They are in control of the system of coercion whereby they say that if you don't go along with them, they will use violence against you. Now, you can tell them they are being stupid; however, you can't get very far with that, because they are being what they consider pragmatists. It works they think. They force others, they rise to power (force their way to it), and they like it. They are for number one, and that number one is not the One of God or Jesus and God or being one with God and Jesus. No, the number one of the coercive rulers is not that One.

So, what's to be done? Well, there are many people who are very much brighter than those in power who could do a much better job of ordering things, but those who are duped by the rulers and afraid of them and their penchant for misusing power, don't rise. They don't see the light. They don't ask, seek, or knock.

The only thing to do is speak the truth of this and then let it be.

We don't all end up in the same place together after this plane of existence. Our souls will not all be together.

George W. Bush and his neocon and false-Christian friends will not be with the blessed peacemakers and pacifists for instance. The blessed peacemakers will have been delivered from the evil of the war-mongers. Hallelujah!

Those who are for giving and sharing to feed the lambs and sheep of God and who work toward that end with all their heart, mind, soul, and strength, will have been delivered from the evil greedy materialists. Hallelujah!

Those who are for harmlessness in all sexual matters and who work toward that will have been delivered from evil, selfish, harmful sexual predators. Hallelujah!

Those who believe in the spirit over the flesh will live the real life free of pain and suffering and death and destruction. Hallelujah!

As you will notice, those who man the barricades in violent revolutions will not be with the peacemakers. They may have the lesser evil than those who oppress the masses, but they still are vastly less enlightened then are the pacifists. If I thought otherwise, I'd be following someone other than Jesus the total pacifist.

Manning the barricades means that violence is a proper method of conflict resolution, which it is not. It's just another form of selfishness that will cause harm to others for self (apart from God).

Look at the spectrum on which violence falls. The right and left of that spectrum are two ends of the same confusion. What good is being anti-war and then fighting with violence? Where is the line drawn? Let's have total peace instead. What good is being against the death penalty, but call for the neocons to be shot or to be for abortion (not just against coercive, punishing, mundane laws against it) but actually for abortion? What good is it to be against coercive laws against homosexuals but then be for coercive laws against those who say homosexuality is harmful? "Homosexuals: What they ignore."

You see the inconsistency of that whole spectrum. Jesus isn't on it. Rise above it. Overcome it. Focus on the solution, which is unselfishness and consistently so. Help with the Christian Commons Project™.


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.