Wall Street Journal/NBC poll showed Obama pulling into a lead of 47%-41% over McCain. How? Colin Powell, Peggy Noonan, Julie Nixon Eisenhower, Susan Eisenhower, Chuck Hagel, Bruce Bartlett, David Friedman, Jeffrey Hart, and Brink Lindsey have either endorsed Obama or made statements suggesting they are leaning in his direction.

If they are for Obama over McCain, then so are many more Republicans. It's a Bush backlash. People with any heart, brains, and soul hate what Bush has done.

Barack Obama is certainly straddling the fence. How long can he keep it up? Will the mass-media give him a pass by avoiding pinning him down? The plutocracy has decided what they'll do. Obama was invited to the Bilderberg Group meeting in Virginia. He did attend, in secret, earlier this month. He no doubt gave very strong assurances, just as he did at the AIPAC meeting.

Read the following article:

From The Sunday Times
June 15, 2008
Dismayed Republicans emerge as Barack Obama supporters
Sarah Baxter


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe

  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 – present, website developer and writer. 2015 – present, insurance broker.

    Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration.

    Volunteerism: 2007 – present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
    • paul trewin

      After investigating what is happening with the bilderberg group about establishing

      one world government is remarkably close to what the bible says will happen in the last days on earth before jesus returns. All christians should be aware that time is running out before God's judgement will come. Don't be fooled God loves you but he will judge you for not accepting his son.

      • Hi Paul,

        The bankers already control. They are the power behind the front. Obama knows the limitations of his power. The limits are set by those who control the money. Obama doesn't control the money. Congress doesn't control the money. The Supreme Court doesn't contol it. The government doesn't control it. The private bankers control it. What's more, there is a law in place that states that the government cannot interfer with the Federal Reserve private-banking cartel. The government cannot audit them. The government cannot tell them what to do.

        The One-World Government, the New World Order, is just a refinement of the front. It's just a seamless continuation of what has been the trend for thousands of years.

        Things are going to become horrendously more wicked while the front that is the so-called government will make out as if it is moral and doing right while it allows for more and more hedonism.

        Standards have been severely twisted going way beyond correcting previous oversights.

        I'm seeing a great deal more nonresponsiveness across the spectrum. That trend will continue worsening. Sickness is compounding. Morality is all but nonexistant.

        We live in a level of Hell. This is a prison for the criminally insane. The inmates are in charge.

        People ignore the truth that's given to them.

        God saves though.

        Truth and Nothing But,


    • Paul Ray

      I'm strickened with imense sadness when I see how few people really care what's happening to our world. I was driving in my car the other day and had the radio on and Green Day's Know Your Enemy had just been aired. I realized after listening to the lyrics, as you should do, that they are trying to wake people up. I went online to read the lyrics, and saw people's thoughless comments "oh, this is so not a good song, not like their others", things of that nature. If people would just open their ears, eyes, and pay attention.... they would see that there ARE people fighting to WAKE the majority. Listen to the song and think for yourself....

      • Paul Ray,

        If that song is to be taken as not satirical, then it is an awful message. Is it satirical? I don't take it that way. It is a call to violence. Even by posting a comment here in support of any such call, you are violating the comment rules here that clearly state that incitement to violence is not allowed. So, is it satirical? If it is, the lyrics have done a very poor job of making that clear. "Rally up the demons of your soul" is part of the overly repetitive, monotonous lyrics. That's sheer evil.

        No, Green Day is leading people astray into the dark with such words. If they don't turn and repent, they'll end up falling where they will hate being even more than they hate the current circumstances of this world. If you follow them, you too will be further lost.

        It's an awful song, and the music is way too loud and mechanical. I don't consider it a demonstration of worthy talent.

        Find peace,