Clarke: Charlie Black Basically Said To Terrorists, 'Yes You Can Manipulate Our Politics, Come And Do It'
By Amanda at 10:49 [June 24, 2008]
Yesterday [Monday, June 23, 2008], Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) distanced himself from chief strategist Charlie Black's comments that a terrorist attack would be a "big advantage" to the McCain campaign. "If he said that, and I do not know the context, I strenuously disagree," McCain told reporters.
There are many things that could be said here; however, let's cut through to the root of the matter. 9/11 was used as a false-flag operation. No one knows the whole story, not those who planned it, not anyone. That's by design. It's a crime where those involved only know on a need-to-know basis.
Many involved don't know they were, and are still, being used. Those at the top have worked it out with the handlers that there is always a degree of plausible deniability.
It's this way. The king says, "Who will rid me of so-and-so?" He doesn't want to know the gory details. He just wants to later here that so-and-so is gone. It goes deeper though. Those who get rid of so-and-so have an understanding that as the orders go out, those in the chain aren't told enough to trace it back to the king or even the top handlers.
Everybody knows where it's coming from or so he or she often just assumes. Everyone is to be on automatic pilot. Those who ask for proof of the authenticity of the secret orders (that the orders are truly coming from the top) are bypassed and/or removed.
In fact, the chain breaks all along itself. The person giving an order doesn't even always know the person to whom the order is being given. Once the order has gone out, all traces of the order might be erased depending upon "sensitivity." It's the exact same way money is laundered by the banks and clearing houses.
Those along this supposedly untraceable chain simply don't want to know the details. They just know that they get their money, etc., via going along no matter how evil the enterprise. If the devil is paying them, so be it, they think.
Many just choose to fool themselves (rationalize) that the system is really run in the end (at the very top) by those with righteous motives. The current worldly system is not run at the very top by those with righteous motives. The motives are wholly selfish. That's why Jesus's kingdom was, and still is not, of this world.
His kingdom will come to be of this world only when the people on the Earth choose to follow his exact prescription for what ails. That is doing away with selfishness as the root emotion. That's when the Great Conflation will take place. That's when the New Heaven and New Earth will be one and the same, just as Jesus is in God and God is in Jesus. They are one and the same, even as Jesus still tells you that he can do nothing alone without God. It is that one we are to join (have God in us and we in God: Unselfishness).
Now, it still goes deeper. The king isn't the one who even started the chain. He's just going along with the whole thing, because that's how he got where he did. He's just part of the system. He doesn't really command. If he gives an order that the system doesn't want to follow, it won't. If he gives an order to be less selfish, the system will go along only so much unless the root emotions are changed.
The current worldly system breaks when people develop consciences. Of course, the cynics say that anyone who develops a conscience can simply be replaced because there is an endless stream of selfish souls. However, that's not the truth.
The truth is that conscience can catch on so much so that the whole system of selfishness can break down and be displaced. That's what frightens the evil overlords most (those who work to be served rather than work to serve all). They are the antichrists.
As for the shallow politics of what Charlie Black said specifically, whom do you fear most to have as your enemy, Richard M. Nixon or John F. Kennedy? Nixon was forced to resign in disgrace. Kennedy had his brains blown out. Nixon prolonged and escalated the Vietnam War. Kennedy threw the steering wheel out the window in the game of chicken with the Russians over nuclear missiles in Cuba. Neither Obama nor McCain is Kennedy or Nixon exactly, but the system can follow either to a degree and bring either down at any time.
Each of them was blowing the cover. Nixon was simply telling people that the government says one thing and does another. He was amazed that people of conscience existed in the U.S. who didn't like that at all. Others were angry with Nixon for revealing the obvious to the hypnotized masses. Kennedy was threatening to tell the whole sorted story pretty much revealing what I'm revealing here now.
Who really calls the shots? Money versus righteousness is the real issue. The spirit of money is the spirit of the untraceable chain (secrets and barriers for evil). The spirit of righteousness is the demise (really knows the secrets and can see through and walk through the barriers) of that system of money and will win out in the end — already has won since the climax of history was the resurrection of Jesus Christ. We're in the dÃ©nouement now.
Perhaps you're still thinking that if we can't get the evidence against them, how are we ever going to stop them. If you're thinking that way, they still have you bamboozled. Look, Jesus said that you know a tree by its fruit. You know the root by the fruit. You know the spirit by its results. What is the current system bringing forth? Look at all the bad news. What is the current system? It's money. The system of money brings forth that which is bad. What evidence are we lacking? None, we have all the evidence we need to change the system from money to its opposite — moneyless. That would be where no money is needed for anything, ever. That's Heaven — the New Heaven.
You may think we can't ever have that. They still have you bamboozled. You aren't projecting out into the future. Look just how recently it was that only a handful of people ever spoke publicly about false-flag operations. Now the term is becoming household. It's becoming common knowledge. It's becoming commonly understood that governments have been doing this wicked trickery for centuries. They've been framing others to fracture souls so they, the evil ones, can seemingly come to the rescue and rule.
Don't fall for it. It's that simple. Carry everything out to its logical conclusion. Don't stop short.
You may think this can't work. The system will stop the knowledge from spreading and catching on. That's what they thought about Jesus. They thought that if they killed him, it would end. They were wrong. They didn't understand what was happening simply by the fact that Jesus opened his mouth. They don't understand what is happening now simply by my writing this with various people from all over the world visiting and reading and with all the various computers sucking it down some of them putting it on storage devices that will last and last. Even the ones working for the evil ones can't escape or kill the transmissible message. They are being tempted by goodness now. It works both ways, but it ends with goodness prevailing.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)