We all know that the torture experts use loud noises to drive others insane. They use rock music and hip-hop and other sounds to bombard others in a sadistic frenzy. We know that people race their engines and play their subwoofers for the same reason, to abuse others. It makes those who do it and those to whom they do sick and sicker.
In Burien Washington where I'm located, we already have the noise of the international airport right next door. We have a freeway running right through town too. However, we have street racers in cars, trucks, and on motorcycles and we have the subwoofer set that often also have loud engines.
Burien has a law against such things:
(1)General Prohibition. It is unlawful for any person to cause, or for any person in possession of property to allow to originate from the property, sound that is a public disturbance noise.
(2)Illustrative Enumeration. The following sounds are public disturbance noises in violation of this article:
(b)The creation of frequent, repetitive or continuous sounds in connection with the starting, operation, repair, rebuilding or testing of any motor vehicle, motorcycle, off-highway vehicle or internal combustion engine within a residential district, so as to unreasonably disturb or interfere with the peace and comfort of owners or possessors of real property.
(e)Sound from motor vehicle audio sound systems, such as tape players, radios and compact disc players, operated at a volume so as to be audible greater than 50 feet from the vehicle itself.
(4)Penalty. Any person who violates the provisions of this article shall be subject to a civil fine not to exceed $250.00 for a first offense. For second and subsequent offenses, the person shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. [Ord. 365 Â§ 1, 2002; Ord. 63 Â§ 81, 1993]
Burien doesn't enforce this law though, at least not very well. It's too bad that they aren't educating themselves and the general public and the young people in the schools about the evils of noise pollution and the evils of selfishness that is getting back at others whether or not those others are responsible for the perpetrator's problems. Warnings would be in order. We have especially one particular motorcycle rider who goes down the streets and freeway clutching and then screaming his very loud engine. There is no reason for him to be doing that except to abuse total strangers. He's obviously in need of help and knowledge. He's ignorant. There's no doubt about it. Would he heed? That's up to God, Satan, and him.
It is always better to educate without violent coercion than it is to punish, which is harmful as so many refuse to learn righteously and just rather spread punishment, abuse, torture, intentional noise pollution, etc.
Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison. Matthew 5:25.
Of course, this is what is called antisocial behavior, and it is anti society at-large. It is indiscriminate abuse.
What's going on with it beyond what I've mentioned? Well, expectations are extremely low. People aren't taught manners, politenesses, and common courtesy. People are abused and don't have it stop with them but pass it on.
Many police officers come out of the ranks of the military where they are taught the roughest ways of dealing with things. They are given some countervailing training in the civilian police, but the militarization of society and the police is causing huge problems in general.
The following should appear at the end of every post:
According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":
Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.
Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.
Political Campaign Intervention
Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.
Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.
Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:
- Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
- Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
- Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
- Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
- Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office
Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:
- The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
- Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
- We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
- When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
- It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
- We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
- We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
- When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
- We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
- It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.
And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)