FOR MINE ANGEL SHALL GO BEFORE THEE, ... AND I WILL CUT THEM OFF: MILITARY ABOMINABLE

     


Title: "Mars, Jamahiriya Museum, Tripoli, Libya. From Lepcis Magna."

 
"For mine Angel shall go before thee, and bring thee in unto the Amorites, and the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Canaanites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites: and I will cut them off." Exodus 23:23

Why? There are two reasons and three ways of looking at this. One way is that the Canaanites and others were irredeemably wicked, doing abominable acts for which they had been warned but went ahead and did them anyway, such as live child sacrifice and even cannibalism by their priests and sexual depravity beyond description. The second way is that it is a cover for covetousness. If you kill them all, there will be none left to retaliate. More so, if you kill them all, there will be none to tell the other side of the story. The third way of looking at it is that it is combination of the first two.

In reading the Marxists about religion and their focus upon Judaism and Christianity, one sees an emphasis upon myth, in particular what the Marxists term the myth put forth by the Creationists that states that evolution is a trick by Satan and that the literal six twenty-four-hour days of creation is literal fact rather than more figurative as they define "literal."

Now, there is no doubt that the wheat and the tares come forth as life and are found capable of being categorized into that which is fit for human consumption and that fit for being removed and discarded. This is Jesus's analogy concerning human behavior and what God's sees as being fit for survival or life as Jesus defines life eternal. This is evolution, even if it isn't stated in the exact same way those who currently are term biologists explain or characterize the process and result. Jesus is making a value judgment based upon his consistent view of reality. Most biologists treat nature as being apart from morality. They hold that nature just is. It is brutal but not moral or immoral.

We don't have any words by Jesus that indicate that he is a literalists as those who currently call themselves Creationists use the term "literal" or that he, Jesus, holds with the view of Creation held out by those said Creationists. We have Jesus referring to Abel, the son of Adam.
That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye slew between the temple and the altar. Matthew 23:35.
However, that's as far back in the genealogy Jesus speaks through the Gospels. We can not assign to Jesus the position of the Fundamentalist Creationists. We do know Jesus holds with figurative language since his parables are exactly that even while they express absolute truths.

What is Jesus's position about humans calling for the movement of the spirit to wrath to be reflected in what the scientist call the natural phenomenon and also in the behavior of human beings toward one another? He doesn't resort to wrath. He kills no one. He didn't come to take lives but to save souls. He clearly acknowledges the fact of wrath – its place (as conceived or viewed as anger) in the harvesting and sorting process, wheat from tares, lambs from sheep, so to speak. He speaks though of those of the spirit of error that takes and sorts carelessly. Such is the U.S. military. Such is all human military. No human knows enough to sort.

There is a cutting off without human hand.

Take no prisoners. Don't spare any of the women or children. Wipe out the entire line, the entire DNA line. Treat them as all tares unworthy of continued existence on this plane. Render that nation, that family, extinct. Take God into your own hands. Take the divine law into your own hands. Be the hand of the vengeance of God, as you define God (wrathful). Be the might of God on Earth. The strongest militarily are the fittest to survive. None of that is the teaching of Jesus Christ. It is the exact opposite. It is the teaching of Mars, the god of war, who comes out from unrighteous, selfish hearts. It is falsehood imagining things about the nature of God versus evil.

Evil is error. God makes no mistakes. Humans make mistakes. Jesus says be as God is. He says be perfect as God is. He says don't be wrathful doing violent harm for you will err. You will take the wheat with the tares. Leave the sorting to God the truth. God will make no errors when sorting. God knows everything in every heart. God knows exactly what is good versus evil.

Jesus did not come to say that the law of Moses was wholly right or sufficient. He came to show and does show the hypocrisy and short comings in that law. He shows the hypocrisy and short comings in the actions and inactions of those who limit themselves to that law.

Today's militarists in the U.S. who call themselves Christians are in error, sin, evil. Look at their legacy. Look at the revelations coming out from Korea concerning the evil spirit of wiping out the innocent with the guilty.
AP IMPACT: Seoul probes civilian `massacres' by US
By CHARLES J. HANLEY and JAE-SOON CHANG, Associated Press Writers
Sun Aug 3, 2008

Look at all the atrocities of every war. They excuse themselves of these. They are excusing themselves now concerning Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, and elsewhere were they are engaged in overt and covert indiscriminate killing all of which is premeditated murder in the first degree.

U.S. commanding generals ordered the killing of thousands of innocent civilian Koreans by bombing and strafing villages and fleeing refugees and those hold up in caves and elsewhere which groups of war refugees might have contained enemy combatants. All those in white approaching U.S. troops as refugees were to be viewed as potential enemy combatants, not to be trusted, and justified in being killed as a consequence. This was official U.S. policy and practice and still is in large measure in varying forms. It was done in Vietnam as well in forms. This is taking innocent flesh lives to be sure of getting at what is perceived as cancerous life. Unfortunately, those taking the innocent are thereby themselves marked as cancerous or as harmful bacteria — unclean. This is pure selfishness.

It is better to die at their hands and live than it is to join them and die. For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it. Matthew 16:25.

Donate


The following should appear at the end of every post:

According to the IRS, "Know the law: Avoid political campaign intervention":

Tax-exempt section 501(c)(3) organizations like churches, universities, and hospitals must follow the law regarding political campaigns. Unfortunately, some don't know the law.

Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are prohibited from participating in any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. The prohibition applies to campaigns at the federal, state and local level.

Violation of this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes. Section 501(c)(3) private foundations are subject to additional restrictions.

Political Campaign Intervention

Political campaign intervention includes any activities that favor or oppose one or more candidates for public office. The prohibition extends beyond candidate endorsements.

Contributions to political campaign funds, public statements of support or opposition (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of an organization, and the distribution of materials prepared by others that support or oppose any candidate for public office all violate the prohibition on political campaign intervention.

Factors in determining whether a communication results in political campaign intervention include the following:

  • Whether the statement identifies one or more candidates for a given public office
  • Whether the statement expresses approval or disapproval of one or more candidates' positions and/or actions
  • Whether the statement is delivered close in time to the election
  • Whether the statement makes reference to voting or an election
  • Whether the issue addressed distinguishes candidates for a given office

Many religious organizations believe, as we do, that the above constitutes a violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That said, we make the following absolutely clear here:

  • The Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project not only do not endorse any candidate for any secular office, we say that Christianity forbids voting in such elections.
  • Furthermore, when we discuss any public-office holder's position, policy, action or inaction, we definitely are not encouraging anyone to vote for that office holder's position.
  • We are not trying to influence secular elections but rather want people to come out from that entire fallen system.
  • When we analyze or discuss what is termed "public policy," we do it entirely from a theological standpoint with an eye to educating professing Christians and those to whom we are openly always proselytizing to convert to authentic Christianity.
  • It is impossible for us to fully evangelize and proselytize without directly discussing the pros and cons of public policy and the positions of secular-office holders, hence the unconstitutionality of the IRS code on the matter.
  • We are not rich and wouldn't be looking for a fight regardless. What we cannot do is compromise our faith (which seeks to harm nobody, quite the contrary).
  • We render unto Caesar what is Caesar's. We render unto God what is God's.
  • When Caesar says to us that unless we shut up about the unrighteousness of Caesar's policies and practices, we will lose the ability of people who donate to us to declare their donations as deductions on their federal and state income-tax returns, we say to Caesar that we cannot shut up while exercising our religion in a very reasonable way.
  • We consider the IRS code on this matter as deliberate economic duress (a form of coercion) and a direct attempt by the federal government to censor dissenting, free political and religious speech.
  • It's not freedom of religion if they tax it.

And when they were come to Capernaum, they that received tribute money came to Peter, and said, Doth not your master pay tribute? He saith, Yes. And when he was come into the house, Jesus prevented him, saying, What thinkest thou, Simon? of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers? Peter saith unto him, Of strangers. Jesus saith unto him, Then are the children free. (Matthew 17:24-26)

  • Subscribe


  • Tom Usher

    About Tom Usher

    Employment: 2008 - present, website developer and writer. 2015 - present, insurance broker. Education: Arizona State University, Bachelor of Science in Political Science. City University of Seattle, graduate studies in Public Administration. Volunteerism: 2007 - present, president of the Real Liberal Christian Church and Christian Commons Project.
    This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.