Title: "Archbishop of Canterbury at Georgetown University #2."
The Times and The Daily Telegraph are reporting that in letters to psychiatrist Deborah Pitt, an evangelical Christian, Rowan Williams, now Archbishop of Canterbury when he was still Archbishop of Wales in 2000 and 2001, said that biblical prohibitions against homosexuality concerned "heterosexuals looking for sexual variety in their experience" rather than homosexuals who keep to one partner. He reportedly wrote, "I concluded that an active sexual relationship between two people of the same sex might therefore reflect the love of God in a way comparable to marriage, if and only if it had about it the same character of absolute covenanted faithfulness." The papers also reportedly say that Williams wrote, the church "has shifted its stance on several matters — notably the rightness of lending money at interest and the moral admissibility of contraception so I am bound to ask if this is another such issue."
Now, first of all, if these reports are correct, Williams is not reading scripture correctly. He's reading things in that aren't justified by the text. Nowhere is there any indication that the prohibition is aimed at heterosexuals rather than at the act of homosexuality, period. He's simply made that up in his head. His premise is without merit; therefore, his conclusion is also not justified. Frankly, the act itself is sin. God's love is absolutely not reflected in that behavior. Lastly, the church was wrong to change its positions concerning usury and contraception. Lending at interest is evil and antichrist. Jesus specifically states that a Christian never lends with an eye to even necessarily getting back the principal, let alone a gain in interest. Also, contraception is a mask for lust that is bad conditioning for when it comes time to fast in general. Remember, Jesus was for fasting. It is vastly better to overcome the urge than it is to engage in contraception used to feed the lustful appetite. This goes to the heart of greed (covetousness and excess) and blood lust (violence).